Literature DB >> 19486621

COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer.

M Buunen, H J Bonjer, W C J Hop, E Haglind, G Kurlberg, J Rosenberg, A M Lacy, M A Cuesta, A D'Hoore, A Fürst, J F Lange, P Jess, O Bulut, P Poornoroozy, K Juul Jensen, M Mark Christensen, E Lundhus, H Ovesen, D Birch, I Iesalnieks, C Jäger, M Kreis, Y van riet, E van der Harst, M F Gerhards, W A Bemelman, B M E Hansson, P A Neijenhuis, H A Prins, C Balague, E Targarona, J A Luján Mompeán, J D Franco Osorio, F J Garcia Molina, S Skullman, Z Läckberg, U Kressner, P Matthiessen, S H Kim, A Alfredo Poza.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer has been proven efficacious but morbidity and oncological outcome need to be investigated in a randomized clinical trial. TRIAL
DESIGN: Non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: The COLOR II trial is an ongoing international randomized clinical trial. Currently 27 hospitals from Europe, South Korea and Canada are including patients. The primary endpoint is loco-regional recurrence rate three years post-operatively. Secondary endpoints cover quality of life, overall and disease free survival, post-operative morbidity and health economy analysis.
RESULTS: By July 2008, 27 hospitals from the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Sweden, Spain, Denmark, South Korea and Canada had included 739 patients. The intra-operative conversion rate in the laparoscopic group was 17%. Distribution of age, location of the tumor and radiotherapy were equal in both treatment groups. Most tumors are located in the mid-rectum (41%).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer is feasible. The results and safety of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer remain unknown, but are subject of interim analysis within the COLOR II trial. Completion of inclusion is expected by the end of 2009. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT00297791 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19486621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  50 in total

1.  Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1485-0: evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contradiction.

Authors:  Sonia Fernández-Ananín; Eduard M Targarona; Carmen Balagué; Carmen Martínez; Pilar Hernández; Manuel Trías
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Colorectal Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon Walsh; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Quality of life after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sanne A L Bartels; Malaika S Vlug; Dirk T Ubbink; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Mei-Jin Huang; Jing-Lin Liang; Hui Wang; Liang Kang; Yan-Hong Deng; Jian-Ping Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Shady Ashamalla; Andy Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Govind Nandakumar; James W Fleshman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

7.  Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection.

Authors:  Alexander Rickert; Florian Herrle; Fabian Doyon; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Outcomes in 132 patients following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer with greater than 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  John H Marks; Renee Huang; Dominique McKeever; Morgan Greenfield
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Jing Gong; De-Bing Shi; Xin-Xiang Li; San-Jun Cai; Zu-Qing Guan; Ye Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital.

Authors:  A H W Schiphorst; A Doeksen; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; A Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.