| Literature DB >> 34277467 |
Anthony M Buckley1, Ines B Moura1, Norie Arai2, William Spittal1, Emma Clark1, Yoshihiro Nishida2, Hannah C Harris1, Karen Bentley1, Georgina Davis1, Dapeng Wang3, Suparna Mitra1, Takanobu Higashiyama2, Mark H Wilcox1.
Abstract
Within the human intestinal tract, dietary, microbial- and host-derived compounds are used as signals by many pathogenic organisms, including Clostridioides difficile. Trehalose has been reported to enhance virulence of certain C. difficile ribotypes; however, such variants are widespread and not correlated with clinical outcomes for patients suffering from C. difficile infection (CDI). Here, we make preliminary observations on how trehalose supplementation affects the microbiota in an in vitro model and show that trehalose-induced changes can reduce the outgrowth of C. difficile, preventing simulated CDI. Three clinically reflective human gut models simulated the effects of sugar (trehalose or glucose) or saline ingestion on the microbiota. Models were instilled with sugar or saline and further exposed to C. difficile spores. The recovery of the microbiota following antibiotic treatment and CDI induction was monitored in each model. The human microbiota remodelled to utilise the bioavailable trehalose. Clindamycin induction caused simulated CDI in models supplemented with either glucose or saline; however, trehalose supplementation did not result in CDI, although limited spore germination did occur. The absence of CDI in trehalose model was associated with enhanced abundances of Finegoldia, Faecalibacterium and Oscillospira, and reduced abundances of Klebsiella and Clostridium spp., compared with the other models. Functional analysis of the microbiota in the trehalose model revealed differences in the metabolic pathways, such as amino acid metabolism, which could be attributed to prevention of CDI. Our data show that trehalose supplementation remodelled the microbiota, which prevented simulated CDI, potentially due to enhanced recovery of nutritionally competitive microbiota against C. difficile.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium difficile; human microbiota; in vitro gut model; microbial competition; trehalose
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34277467 PMCID: PMC8284250 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.670935
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Schematic timeline of the in vitro triple vessel chemostat gut model and experimental design for each model. C. difficile spores (black lines) were instilled and commencement of sugar regimen [either trehalose (T), glucose (G) or saline (S) (green arrow)] before addition of antibiotics (blue arrow). Microbial populations were monitored post antibiotic for recovery and induction of CDI. Numbers in italicise brackets denotes the day that samples for DNA extraction were taken.
Figure 2Taxonomic analysis of the faecal donors, pooled slurry and the steady state from the three individual models. Principal coordinate analysis of the five donors and the faecal slurry based on 16S rRNA sequencing (A). Bacterial family abundance (%) found within the pooled faecal slurry used to initiate all models (B) and at end of steady state period (experimental day 14) from the three models (G, T and S) (C).
Figure 3Detection of glucose (A) and trehalose (B) in the gut models. Sugar concentrations from model T (blue lines), G (green lines), and S (red lines) were detected by ion chromatography. Results are shown as mean ± S.D of three technical replicates. Sugar duration and clindamycin dosing are indicated by the top green and blue arrows, respectively.
Abundance of trehalose specific Pfam domains in model T.
| Pfam domain | Experimental period | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steady state | Pre-clindamycin | During clindamycin | 1-week post clindamycin | |
| Trehalose phosphatase | 463 | 1673 | 7321 | 1110 |
| Trehalase | 4908 | 6871 | 31494 | 6871 |
Figure 4Microbiota changes throughout the model timeline after supplementation with either trehalose (model T; A), glucose (model G; B) or saline (model S; C). Upper line graphs represent diversity changes, as measured by Shannon Diversity Index, throughout the timeline. Results are shown as mean ± S.D of four technical replicates analysed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Lower stacked bar charts represent the bacterial taxonomical abundance changes in each model over time. Results are shown as mean of four technical replicates analysed by 16S rRNA sequencing.
Figure 5Recovery of C. difficile from model S, (S), model G, (G) and model T (T). Recovery of the total C. difficile populations (red lines) and the spore populations (blue lines) from vessel 3 are shown for each model. Spore germination and outgrowth was determined by a divergence between the red and blue lines. The detection of toxin is represented by orange arrows; there is no orange arrow for model T as no toxin was detected. Results expressed as mean ± SD from three technical replicates. CD spores denotes when the C. difficile spores were inoculated into the model. Blue arrow denotes when clindamycin was instilled into the models.
Differential abundance analysis of model T, compared to models G and S, at day 38.
| Population name | Log2 fold change | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| s_ | -15.24 | -15.14 |
| s_ | -15.07 | -14.97 |
| s_ | -14.92 | -14.82 |
| s_ | -14.81 | -14.71 |
| s_ | -14.57 | -14.47 |
| s_ | -12.35 | -12.25 |
| s_ | -2.61 | -19.61 |
| s_ | 18.22 | 16.8 |
| s_ | 17.12 | 18.08 |
| s_ | 17.05 | 16.72 |
| s_ | 15.51 | 16.06 |
| s_ | 15.30 | 16.43 |
| s_ | 3.4 | 3.59 |
| s_ | 3.18 | 2.27 |
| s_ | 3.05 | 2.57 |
| g_ | -14.91 | -14.81 |
| g_ | -14.83 | -14.73 |
| g_ | -14.55 | -14.45 |
| g_ | -14.45 | -14.36 |
| g_ | -14.38 | -14.28 |
| g_ | -14.34 | -14.24 |
| g_ | -12.52 | -12.42 |
| g_ | 20.06 | 19.12 |
| g_ | 15.98 | 16.47 |
| f_Peptoniphilaceae | -12.44 | -12.34 |
Taxonomic level of microbial populations from whole genome sequencing data. s_ species, g_ genus or f_ family.
Log2 fold change compared with model T, i.e. a positive number (red) indicates microbial population was significantly (FDR p ≤ 0.01) less abundant in model T compared with models G and S, whilst a negative number (green) indicates microbial population was significantly (FDR p ≤ 0.01) more abundant in model T.
Figure 6Differential abundance analysis (fold-change) of metabolic pathways in model T compared to models G (solid bars) and S (hatched bars) at day 38, based on metagenomics analysis. Abundance bars highlight the KEGG metabolic pathways (A) or KEGG cell surface components (B) that are significantly (p=<0.05) more abundant (>-1.5 fold-change) or less abundant (>1.5 fold-change) in model T. Pathways or components were only included where 80% of the genetic elements in that pathway/component showed an increased or decreased abundance from technical replicates of model T compared to both models G and S ( ).