| Literature DB >> 34276732 |
Ricardo M F da Costa1,2, Ana Winters3, Barbara Hauck3, Daniel Martín2, Maurice Bosch3, Rachael Simister4, Leonardo D Gomez4, Luís A E Batista de Carvalho2, Jorge M Canhoto1.
Abstract
Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana and Phragmites australis are high-biomass-producing perennial Poalean species that grow abundantly and spontaneously in warm temperate regions, such as in Mediterranean-type climates, like those of Southern Europe, Western United States coastal areas, or in regions of South America, South Africa and Australia. Given their vigorous and spontaneous growth, biomass from the studied grasses often accumulates excessively in unmanaged agro-forestry areas. Nonetheless, this also creates the demand and opportunity for the valorisation of these biomass sources, particularly their cell wall polymers, for biorefining applications. By contrast, a related crop, Miscanthus × giganteus, is a perennial grass that has been extensively studied for lignocellulosic biomass production, as it can grow on low-input agricultural systems in colder climates. In this study Fourier transform mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC) and lignin content determinations were used for a comparative compositional characterisation of A. donax, C. selloana and P. australis harvested from the wild, in relation to a trial field-grown M. × giganteus high-yielding genotype. A high-throughput saccharification assay showed relatively high sugar release values from the wild-grown grasses, even with a 0.1M NaOH mild alkali pretreatment. In addition to this alkaline pretreatment, biomass was treated with white-rot fungi (WRF), which preferentially degrade lignin more readily than holocellulose. Three fungal species were used: Ganoderma lucidum, Pleurotus ostreatus and Trametes versicolor. Our results showed that neutral sugar contents are not significantly altered, while some lignin is lost during the pretreatments. Furthermore, sugar release upon enzymatic saccharification was enhanced, and this was dependent on the plant biomass and fungal species used in the treatment. To maximise the potential for lignocellulose valorisation, the liquid fractions from the pretreatments were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography - photodiode array detection - electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-PDA-ESI-MS n ). This study is one of the first to report on the composition of WRF-treated grass biomass, while assessing the potential relevance of breakdown products released during the treatments, beyond more traditional sugar-for-energy applications. Ultimately, we expect that our data will help promote the valorisation of unused biomass resources, create economic value, while contributing to the implementation of sustainable biorefining systems.Entities:
Keywords: Arundo donax; Cortaderia selloana; Miscanthus × giganteus; Phragmites australis; biomass; cell wall; marginal lands; white-rot fungi
Year: 2021 PMID: 34276732 PMCID: PMC8283202 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.679966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of the employed experimental study design.
FIGURE 2Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform mid-infrared (FTIR-ATR) spectra of alcohol insoluble residue (AIR) of leaf and stem biomass from Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana, Phragmites australis and Miscanthus × giganteus. Grey shading highlights the most significantly different regions of the spectra, based on ANOVA (p ≤ 0.00001), while the heatmaps highlight the relative absorption intensities according to the grass species. Spectral bands of interest are marked from a – l, see text and Table 1 for more information.
Assignment of relevant FTIR-ATR absorption bands characteristic of cell wall biomass from poalean species.
| 1736 – 1730 | 1735 ( | C = O vibrations | Xylan | |
| 1625 – 1635 | 1630 ( | COO– vibrations | ||
| 1515 – 1505 | 1515 ( | Aromatic ring vibration | Lignin and other phenols | |
| 1322 – 1310 | 1315 ( | Syringyl monomer vibration | Lignin | |
| 1275 – 1256 | 1270 ( | Guaiacyl monomer vibration | Lignin | |
| 1240 – 1235 | 1240 ( | C-O vibrations of acetyl | Xylan | |
| 1170 – 1160 | 1160 ( | Polysaccharides | ||
| 1060 – 1055 | 1055 ( | C-O, C-C and O-C-H vibration | Cellulose | |
| 1035 – 1030 | 1035 ( | C-O, C-C and C-C-O stretching | Cellulose | |
| 993 – 985 | 990 ( | C-O stretching | Cellulose | |
| 898 – 890 | 893 ( | C-O-C asymmetric stretching | Cellulose (amorphous) | |
| 840 – 830 | 835 ( | Lignin |
FIGURE 3Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform mid-infrared (FTIR-ATR) spectra of untreated alcohol insoluble residue (AIR) and pretreated with 0.1 M NaOH for 24 h at 21°C (AIK), for leaf and stem biomass from Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana, Phragmites australis and Miscanthus × giganteus. The difference between AIR and AIK biomasses are presented by a red dashed line. Spectral bands of interest are marked as: a (1736 – 1730 cm–1) and f (1240 – 1235 cm–1).
FIGURE 4Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform mid-infrared (FTIR-ATR) spectra of milled but not organic solvent-washed biomass samples from Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana, Phragmites australis and Miscanthus × giganteus, treated with white-rot fungi (WRF; 30 days) and/or in combination with 0.1 M NaOH (24 h at 21°C) alkali pretreatment. Three fungal species were used: Ganoderma lucidum, Pleurotus ostreatus and Trametes versicolor. Control samples consist of biomass incubated only with water, without WRF. Spectral bands of interest are marked as: a (1736 – 1730 cm–1), b (1625 – 1635 cm–1) and f (1240 – 1235 cm–1).
FIGURE 5Saccharification of leaf and stem biomass from four poalean species measured by a high-throughput saccharification assay: Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana, Phragmites australis and Miscanthus × giganteus. Mean nmol of reducing sugar released per mg of biomass material (nmol mg–1) after 8 h incubation in a hydrolytic enzyme mixture. Red bars (A,D) refer to non-pretreated alcohol insoluble residue samples, without (AIR) or with (AIK) a 0.1 M NaOH mild alkali pretreatment. Green bars (B,E) refer to samples treated only with one of the following white rot fungi (WRF): Ganoderma lucidum, GAN; Pleurotus ostreatus, PLE; Trametes versicolor, TRA. Blue bars (C,F) designate treatments where the 0.1 M NaOH treatment was employed subsequently to the WRF pretreatment. Pairwise t-tests were performed between each treatment and non-pretreated control samples (AIR; or NF, no fungi; striped bars) to evaluate the impact of the pretreatments. The treatments which are significantly different from the controls are marked with a “*” (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars represent the standard error of the sample replicates. For the saccharification values see Supplementary Table 1.
FIGURE 6Mean percentage (%) composition of alcohol insoluble residues (AIR) prepared from previously pretreated biomass from Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana, Phragmites australis and Miscanthus × giganteus (no results are shown for M. × giganteus leaves due to sample losses). Pretreatment acronyms: NP, non-pretreated control samples (incubated only with water; striped bars); WRF, samples pretreated only with Pleurotus ostreatus; ALK, samples pretreated only with 0.1 M NaOH for 24 h at 21°C; W + K, samples pretreated with P. ostreatus followed by 0.1 M NaOH for 24 h at 21°C. Ara/Xyl is the ratio of arabinose to xylose determined in the biomasses. Pairwise t-tests were performed between each treatment and control (NP) samples to evaluate the impact of the pretreatments in relation to NP samples for each variable, the treatments which are significantly different from the NP controls are marked with a “*” (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars represent the standard error of the sample replicates.
Mean percentage (%) composition of alcohol insoluble residues (AIR) prepared from previously pretreated biomass from Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana, Phragmites australis and Miscanthus × giganteus.
| 30.0 ± 1.0 | 17.7 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 22.9 ± 0.4 | ||
| 30.3 ± 0.8 | 17.9 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± < 0.1 | 0.16 ± < 0.01 | 22.2 ± 0.5 | ||
| 31.2 ± 1.7 | 18.9 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 0.17 ± < 0.01 | 20.6 ± 0.9 | ||
| 32.5 ± 0.3 | 18.9 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± < 0.1 | 0.16 ± < 0.01 | 20.3 ± 0.1 | ||
| 30.2 ± 0.9 | 21.1 ± 0.8 | 3.7 ± < 0.1 | 0.18 ± < 0.01 | 23.8 ± 0.5 | ||
| 30.1 ± 1.3 | 20.3 ± 0.8 | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 23.4 ± 0.2 | ||
| 33.6 ± 1.5 | 21.8 ± 0.5 | 4.2 ± 0.1 | 0.19 ± < 0.01 | 23.3 ± 0.6 | ||
| 32.5 ± 2.2 | 21.8 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 0.1 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 22.4 ± 0.3 | ||
| 28.8 ± 2.4 | 15.8 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 0.14 ± < 0.01 | 20.5 ± 0.1 | ||
| 28.0 ± 2.2 | 16.2 ± 0.7 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 0.15 ± < 0.01 | 20.1 ± 0.6 | ||
| 31.9 ± 1.3 | 17.5 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 0.14 ± < 0.01 | 19.6 ± 0.6 | ||
| 30.2 ± 1.1 | 17.7 ± 0.7 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 19.1 ± 1.0 | ||
| 33.2 ± 0.6 | 18.8 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± < 0.1 | 0.09 ± < 0.01 | 27.8 ± 2.2 | ||
| 33.2 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± < 0.1 | 0.10 ± < 0.01 | 24.3 ± 0.1 | ||
| 34.7 ± 0.3 | 19.6 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 0.10 ± < 0.01 | 24.3 ± 0.7 | ||
| 37.6 ± 1.0 | 20.6 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 0.10 ± < 0.01 | 24.1 ± < 0.1 | ||
| 31.0 ± 0.5 | 19.1 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 24.9 ± 0.3 | ||
| 30.1 ± 0.2 | 18.6 ± < 0.1 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 25.0 ± 0.3 | ||
| 32.1 ± 0.9 | 19.2 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 23.7 ± 0.7 | ||
| 31.7 ± 1.2 | 19.7 ± 0.8 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 23.3 ± 0.3 | ||
| 39.4 ± 1.4 | 19.2 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 0.10 ± < 0.01 | 23.3 ± 0.4 | ||
| 39.2 ± 2.0 | 19.3 ± 1.0 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 0.10 ± < 0.01 | 24.0 ± 0.7 | ||
| 39.3 ± 1.3 | 19.5 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± < 0.1 | 0.09 ± < 0.01 | 22.9 ± 0.3 | ||
| 41.4 ± 0.4 | 19.8 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± < 0.1 | 0.09 ± < 0.01 | 24.5 ± 0.4 | ||
| 38.3 ± 2.9 | 16.2 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± < 0.1 | 0.13 ± < 0.01 | 27.0 ± < 0.1 | ||
| 37.8 ± 1.0 | 15.7 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± < 0.1 | 0.12 ± < 0.01 | 27.1 ± 0.3 | ||
| 39.1 ± 0.3 | 16.3 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 0.12 ± < 0.01 | 24.8 ± 0.5 | ||
| 39.4 ± 0.3 | 16.7 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± < 0.1 | 0.12 ± < 0.01 | 23.4 ± 0.3 | ||
Abundance of compounds observed in pretreatment liquid fractions obtained from leaf and stem plant material.
| Coumaric acid | ND | ND | + + | + + + + | ND | ND | + + | + + + | |
| Hydroxybenzoic acid | ND | ND | Trace | + + + | ND | ND | + | + + + | |
| Ferulic acid | + | + + | + | + | ND | ND | + | ND | |
| Diferulic acid isomers | + + + | + + + | ND | + + | + + + | ND | ND | ND | |
| Ferulic acid cyclobutane isomers | + + + + | + + + | ND | + + | + + + | Trace | ND | Trace | |
| Apigenin-C-pentoside-C-pentoside | ND | + | ND | + | + | ND | ND | + | |
| Apigenin-C-hexoside-C-pentoside | + | + | + | + + | + +++ | + | + + | + + | |
| Coumaric acid | ND | ND | + + + | + + + + | ND | ND | + + | + + + + | |
| Hydroxybenzoic acid | ND | ND | + + | + + + | ND | ND | + + + | + + + | |
| Ferulic acid | Trace | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Diferulic acid isomers | + + | + + + | + + + | + + | + | + + | + | + + | |
| Ferulic acid cyclobutane isomers | + + | + + + | + + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Apigenin-C-pentoside-C-pentoside | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Apigenin-C-hexoside-C-pentoside | + + | + | + + | ++ | + ++ | ++ + + | + +++ | ++ + + | |
| Compound M | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Coumaric acid | ND | ND | + + + + | + + | ND | Trace | + + + + | + + + + | |
| Hydroxybenzoic acid | ND | ND | + | + | Trace | ND | + + + | + + + | |
| Ferulic acid | + + + | + + + | + | + | Trace | Trace | ND | ND | |
| Diferulic acid isomers | + + + + | + + + | + + | + + | + + | + + | Trace | + | |
| Ferulic acid cyclobutane isomers | + + + + | + + | + + | + + | Trace | + | + | + | |
| Apigenin-C-pentoside-C-pentoside | ND | + + + + | ND | + + + | Trace | + + + | + | + + | |
| Apigenin-C-hexoside-C-pentoside | ND | + + + + | ND | + + + | ND | + + + + | ND | + + + + | |
| Compound M | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Coumaric acid | ND | ND | + + + + | + + + + | |||||
| Hydroxybenzoic acid | ND | ND | + + + + | + + + | |||||
| Ferulic acid | Trace | Trace | ND | ND | |||||
| Diferulic acid isomers | ND | + | Trace | Trace | |||||
| Ferulic acid cyclobutane isomers | ND | + + | + | + | |||||
| Apigenin-C-pentoside-C-pentoside | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Apigenin-C-hexoside-C-pentoside | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Compound M | ND | + + + + | ND | + + + + | |||||