Literature DB >> 34275069

Detection of microsleep states from the EEG: a comparison of feature reduction methods.

Sudhanshu S D P Ayyagari1,2,3, Richard D Jones4,5,6, Stephen J Weddell1,2,3.   

Abstract

Microsleeps are brief lapses in consciousness with complete suspension of performance. They are the cause of fatal accidents in many transport sectors requiring sustained attention, especially driving. A microsleep-warning device, using wireless EEG electrodes, could be used to rouse a user from an imminent microsleep. High-dimensional datasets, especially in EEG-based classification, present challenges as there are often a large number of potentially useful features for detecting the phenomenon of interest. Thus, it is often important to reduce the dimension of the original data prior to training the classifier. In this study, linear dimensionality reduction methods-principal component analysis (PCA) and probabilistic PCA (PPCA)-were compared with eight non-linear dimensionality reduction methods (kernel PCA, classical multi-dimensional scaling, isometric mapping, nearest neighbour estimation, stochastic neighbourhood embedding, autoencoder, stochastic proximity embedding, and Laplacian eigenmaps) on previously collected behavioural and EEG data from eight healthy non-sleep-deprived volunteers performing a 1D-visuomotor tracking task for 1 h. The effectiveness of the feature reduction algorithms was evaluated by visual inspection of class separation on 3D scatterplots, by trustworthiness scores, and by microsleep detection performance on a stacked-generalisation-based linear discriminant analysis (LDA) system estimating the microsleep/responsive state at 1 Hz based on the reduced features. On trustworthiness, PPCA outperformed PCA, but PCA outperformed all of the non-linear techniques. The trustworthiness score for each feature reduction method also correlated strongly with microsleep-state detection performance, providing strong validation of the ability of trustworthiness to estimate the relative effectiveness of feature reduction approaches, in terms of predicting performance, and ability to do so independently of the gold standard. Graphical abstract Proposed microsleep detection system.
© 2021. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Keywords:  Classification; Detection; EEG; Feature reduction; Microsleeps

Year:  2021        PMID: 34275069     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02386-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  11 in total

Review 1.  Consensus statement: fatigue and accidents in transport operations.

Authors:  T Akerstedt
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  The isomap algorithm and topological stability.

Authors:  Mukund Balasubramanian; Eric L Schwartz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Efficient and regular patterns of nighttime sleep are related to increased vulnerability to microsleeps following a single night of sleep restriction.

Authors:  Carrie R H Innes; Govinda R Poudel; Richard D Jones
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Local multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  Jarkko Venna; Samuel Kaski
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2006-06-19

5.  Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks.

Authors:  G E Hinton; R R Salakhutdinov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Frequent lapses of responsiveness during an extended visuomotor tracking task in non-sleep-deprived subjects.

Authors:  Malik T R Peiris; Richard D Jones; Paul R Davidson; Grant J Carroll; Philip J Bones
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.981

7.  EEG-based lapse detection with high temporal resolution.

Authors:  Paul R Davidson; Richard D Jones; Malik T R Peiris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of mental rotation and memory scanning: a multidimensional scaling analysis of brain activation patterns.

Authors:  G A Tagaris; W Richter; S G Kim; G Pellizzer; P Andersen; K Ugurbil; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-05

9.  Sleepiness is not always perceived before falling asleep in healthy, sleep-deprived subjects.

Authors:  Uli S Herrmann; Christian W Hess; Adrian G Guggisberg; Corinne Roth; Matthias Gugger; Johannes Mathis
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Losing the struggle to stay awake: divergent thalamic and cortical activity during microsleeps.

Authors:  Govinda R Poudel; Carrie R H Innes; Philip J Bones; Richard Watts; Richard D Jones
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.