John S P Tulloch1, Massimo Micocci2, Peter Buckle2, Karen Lawrenson3, Patrick Kierkegaard2,4, Anna McLister2, Adam L Gordon5,6, Marta García-Fiñana7, Steve Peddie8, Matthew Ashton3, Iain Buchan7, Paula Parvulescu3. 1. Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool CH64 7TE, UK. 2. NIHR London In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, UK. 3. Public Health Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool L3 1DS, UK. 4. CRUK Convergence Science Centre, Institute for Cancer Research & Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 5. Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. 6. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK. 7. Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 8. Adults Social Care Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool L3 1DS, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Care homes have been severely affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Rapid antigen testing could identify most SARS-CoV-2 infected staff and visitors before they enter homes. We explored implementation of staff and visitor testing protocols using lateral flow devices (LFDs). METHODS: An evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 LFD-based testing protocol in 11 care homes in Liverpool, UK, including staff and visitor testing, plus a qualitative exploratory study in nine of these homes. The proportion of pilot homes with outbreaks, and outbreak size, were compared to non-pilot homes in Liverpool. Adherence to testing protocols was evaluated. Fifteen staff were interviewed, and transcript data were thematically coded using an iterative analysis to identify and categorize factors influencing testing implementation. RESULTS: In total, 1,638 LFD rapid tests were performed on 407 staff. Protocol adherence was poor with 8.6% of staff achieving >75% protocol adherence, and 25.3% achieving $\ge$50%. Six care homes had outbreaks during the study. Compared to non-pilot care homes, there was no evidence of significant difference in the proportion of homes with outbreaks, or the size of outbreaks. Qualitative data showed difficulty implementing testing strategies due to excessive work burden. Factors influencing adherence related to test integration and procedural factors, socio-economic factors, cognitive overload and the emotional value of testing. CONCLUSION: Implementation of staff and visitor care home LFD testing protocols was poorly adhered to and consequently did not reduce the number or scale of COVID-19 outbreaks. More focus is needed on the contextual and behavioural factors that influence protocol adherence.
INTRODUCTION: Care homes have been severely affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Rapid antigen testing could identify most SARS-CoV-2 infected staff and visitors before they enter homes. We explored implementation of staff and visitor testing protocols using lateral flow devices (LFDs). METHODS: An evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 LFD-based testing protocol in 11 care homes in Liverpool, UK, including staff and visitor testing, plus a qualitative exploratory study in nine of these homes. The proportion of pilot homes with outbreaks, and outbreak size, were compared to non-pilot homes in Liverpool. Adherence to testing protocols was evaluated. Fifteen staff were interviewed, and transcript data were thematically coded using an iterative analysis to identify and categorize factors influencing testing implementation. RESULTS: In total, 1,638 LFD rapid tests were performed on 407 staff. Protocol adherence was poor with 8.6% of staff achieving >75% protocol adherence, and 25.3% achieving $\ge$50%. Six care homes had outbreaks during the study. Compared to non-pilot care homes, there was no evidence of significant difference in the proportion of homes with outbreaks, or the size of outbreaks. Qualitative data showed difficulty implementing testing strategies due to excessive work burden. Factors influencing adherence related to test integration and procedural factors, socio-economic factors, cognitive overload and the emotional value of testing. CONCLUSION: Implementation of staff and visitor care home LFD testing protocols was poorly adhered to and consequently did not reduce the number or scale of COVID-19 outbreaks. More focus is needed on the contextual and behavioural factors that influence protocol adherence.
Authors: R Green; J S P Tulloch; C Tunnah; E Coffey; K Lawrenson; A Fox; J Mason; R Barnett; A Constantine; W Shepherd; M Ashton; M B J Beadsworth; R Vivancos; I Hall; N Walker; S Ghebrehewet Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Massimo Micocci; Adam L Gordon; A Joy Allen; Timothy Hicks; Patrick Kierkegaard; Anna McLister; Simon Walne; Gail Hayward; Peter Buckle Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Peter Buckle; Massimo Micocci; John Tulloch; Patrick Kierkegaard; Paula Parvulescu; Carl Thompson; Karen Spilsbury; A Joy Allen; Richard Body; Gail Hayward; Iain Buchan; Adam L Gordon Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Marta García-Fiñana; David M Hughes; Christopher P Cheyne; Girvan Burnside; Mark Stockbridge; Tom A Fowler; Veronica L Fowler; Mark H Wilcox; Malcolm G Semple; Iain Buchan Journal: BMJ Date: 2021-07-06
Authors: Jan M Stratil; Renke L Biallas; Jacob Burns; Laura Arnold; Karin Geffert; Angela M Kunzler; Ina Monsef; Julia Stadelmaier; Katharina Wabnitz; Tim Litwin; Clemens Kreutz; Anna Helen Boger; Saskia Lindner; Ben Verboom; Stephan Voss; Ani Movsisyan Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-15
Authors: Patrick Kierkegaard; Timothy Hicks; A Joy Allen; Yaling Yang; Gail Hayward; Margaret Glogowska; Brian D Nicholson; Peter Buckle Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-12-18
Authors: Jana Lasser; Johannes Zuber; Johannes Sorger; Elma Dervic; Katharina Ledebur; Simon David Lindner; Elisabeth Klager; Maria Kletečka-Pulker; Harald Willschke; Katrin Stangl; Sarah Stadtmann; Christian Haslinger; Peter Klimek; Thomas Wochele-Thoma Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Kieran A Walsh; Natasha Broderick; Susan Ahern; Christopher G Fawsitt; Katie M O'Brien; Marie Carrigan; Patricia Harrington; Michelle O'Neill; Susan M Smith; Susan Spillane; Conor Teljeur; Máirín Ryan Journal: Rev Med Virol Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 11.043
Authors: Lucy Marsden; David M Hughes; Rhiannon Corcoran; Christopher P Cheyne; Matt Ashton; Iain Buchan; Emer Coffey; Marta García-Fiñana Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2022-07-01