Literature DB >> 34272714

Case Study 7: Transporters Case Studies-In Vitro Solutions for Translatable Outcomes.

Sid Bhoopathy1, Chris Bode2, Vatsala Naageshwaran2, Erica Weiskircher-Hildebrandt3, Venkata Mukkavilli2, Ismael J Hidalgo2.   

Abstract

Assessing the interactions of a new drug candidate with transporters, either as a substrate, inhibitor, or inducer, is no simple matter. There are many clinically relevant transporters, as many as nine to be evaluated for an FDA submission and up to 11 for the EMA as of 2020. Additionally, it is likely that if a compound is a substrate or inhibitor of one transporter, it will be so for other transporters as well. There are practically no specific substrates or inhibitors, presumably because the specificities of drug transporters are so broad and overlapping, and even fewer clinically relevant probes that can be used to evaluate transporter function in humans. In the case of some transporters, it is advisable to evaluate an NCE with more than one test system and/or more than one probe substrate in order to convince oneself (and regulatory authorities) that a clinical drug interaction study is not warranted. Finally, each test system has its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages. One has to appreciate the nuances of the available tools (test systems, probe substrates, etc.) to select the most relevant tools for the study and design the optimal in vitro experiment. In this chapter, several examples are used to illustrate the successful interpretation of in vitro data for both efflux and uptake transporters. Some data presented in this chapter are unpublished at the time of the compilation of this book. It has been included in this chapter to provide a sense of the complexities in transporter kinetics to the reader.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCRP; Directional transporter assay; Efflux transporters; OAT; OATP; OCT; P-gp; Uptake transporters

Year:  2021        PMID: 34272714     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1554-6_26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  47 in total

1.  The role of a basolateral transporter in rosuvastatin transport and its interplay with apical breast cancer resistance protein in polarized cell monolayer systems.

Authors:  Jibin Li; Ying Wang; Wei Zhang; Yuehua Huang; Kristin Hein; Ismael J Hidalgo
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 2.  Opioid analgesics and P-glycoprotein efflux transporters: a potential systems-level contribution to analgesic tolerance.

Authors:  Susan L Mercer; Andrew Coop
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Effect of grapefruit juice volume on the reduction of fexofenadine bioavailability: possible role of organic anion transporting polypeptides.

Authors:  George K Dresser; Richard B Kim; David G Bailey
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  The impact of P-glycoprotein on the disposition of drugs targeted for indications of the central nervous system: evaluation using the MDR1A/1B knockout mouse model.

Authors:  Angela Doran; R Scott Obach; Bill J Smith; Natilie A Hosea; Stacey Becker; Ernesto Callegari; Cuiping Chen; Xi Chen; Edna Choo; Julie Cianfrogna; Loretta M Cox; John P Gibbs; Megan A Gibbs; Heather Hatch; Cornelis E C A Hop; Ilana N Kasman; Jennifer Laperle; Jianhua Liu; Xingrong Liu; Michael Logman; Debra Maclin; Frank M Nedza; Frederick Nelson; Emily Olson; Sandhya Rahematpura; David Raunig; Sabrinia Rogers; Kari Schmidt; Douglas K Spracklin; Mark Szewc; Matthew Troutman; Elaine Tseng; Meihua Tu; Jeffrey W Van Deusen; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Gary Walens; Ellen Q Wang; Diane Wong; Adam S Yasgar; Chenghong Zhang
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  In vitro p-glycoprotein inhibition assays for assessment of clinical drug interaction potential of new drug candidates: a recommendation for probe substrates.

Authors:  Jarkko Rautio; Joan E Humphreys; Lindsey O Webster; Anand Balakrishnan; John P Keogh; Jeevan R Kunta; Cosette J Serabjit-Singh; Joseph W Polli
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 3.922

6.  Different effects of three transporting inhibitors, verapamil, cimetidine, and probenecid, on fexofenadine pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Norio Yasui-Furukori; Tsukasa Uno; Kazunobu Sugawara; Tomonori Tateishi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine: evaluation of a microdose and assessment of absolute oral bioavailability.

Authors:  Graham Lappin; Yoko Shishikura; Roeline Jochemsen; Richard John Weaver; Charlotte Gesson; Brian Houston; Berend Oosterhuis; Ole J Bjerrum; Malcolm Rowland; Colin Garner
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Vectorial transport of fexofenadine across Caco-2 cells: involvement of apical uptake and basolateral efflux transporters.

Authors:  Xin Ming; Beverly M Knight; Dhiren R Thakker
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability.

Authors:  G L Amidon; H Lennernäs; V P Shah; J R Crison
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Quantitative investigation of the role of breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp/Abcg2) in limiting brain and testis penetration of xenobiotic compounds.

Authors:  Junichi Enokizono; Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Atsushi Ose; Alfred H Schinkel; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.922

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.