| Literature DB >> 34270926 |
Joel D Pearson1, Katherine Huang2, Marek Pacal2, Sean R McCurdy2, Suying Lu2, Arthur Aubry1, Tao Yu2, Kristine M Wadosky3, Letian Zhang3, Tao Wang4, Alex Gregorieff5, Mohammad Ahmad2, Helen Dimaras6, Ellen Langille7, Susan P C Cole8, Philippe P Monnier9, Benjamin H Lok10, Ming-Sound Tsao11, Nagako Akeno12, Daniel Schramek7, Kathryn A Wikenheiser-Brokamp13, Erik S Knudsen14, Agnieszka K Witkiewicz15, Jeffrey L Wrana7, David W Goodrich3, Rod Bremner16.
Abstract
Cancer heterogeneity impacts therapeutic response, driving efforts to discover over-arching rules that supersede variability. Here, we define pan-cancer binary classes based on distinct expression of YAP and YAP-responsive adhesion regulators. Combining informatics with in vivo and in vitro gain- and loss-of-function studies across multiple murine and human tumor types, we show that opposite pro- or anti-cancer YAP activity functionally defines binary YAPon or YAPoff cancer classes that express or silence YAP, respectively. YAPoff solid cancers are neural/neuroendocrine and frequently RB1-/-, such as retinoblastoma, small cell lung cancer, and neuroendocrine prostate cancer. YAP silencing is intrinsic to the cell of origin, or acquired with lineage switching and drug resistance. The binary cancer groups exhibit distinct YAP-dependent adhesive behavior and pharmaceutical vulnerabilities, underscoring clinical relevance. Mechanistically, distinct YAP/TEAD enhancers in YAPoff or YAPon cancers deploy anti-cancer integrin or pro-cancer proliferative programs, respectively. YAP is thus pivotal across cancer, but in opposite ways, with therapeutic implications.Entities:
Keywords: RB1; TAZ/WWTR1; TEAD; YAP; cancer plasticity; cancer stratification; neuroendocrine cancer; retinoblastoma; retinoma; small cell cancers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34270926 PMCID: PMC8981970 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.06.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell ISSN: 1535-6108 Impact factor: 31.743