Literature DB >> 3426885

Definition of a spine fracture threshold based upon prospective fracture risk.

P D Ross1, R D Wasnich, L K Heilbrun, J M Vogel.   

Abstract

Assessment of fracture threshold (FT) could have important clinical application in determining which individuals should be treated preventively, and what level of therapy to prescribe, if suitable treatment regimens can be developed. We propose that FT be defined as the bone mineral content (BMC) at which the risk of fracture doubles, relative to premenopausal women, as determined by logistic regression analysis of spine fracture incidence in a prospective study of 408 postmenopausal women. The observed values for the FT agree well with those reported by others, based upon more arbitrary definitions. More than 90% of individuals with new nonviolent spine fractures have BMC below the fracture threshold, while fewer than 10% of younger women (age 30-45) are below this value. Although not all women with BMC below the FT have had fractures, they are at increased risk of fracture. Women with BMC equivalent to the FT have at least a 5% chance of fracture over a 10-year period, and the probability of fracture rises rapidly as BMC decreases. BMC appears to be a much stronger predictor of fracture risk than age or body size (height or weight). Thus, use of a BMC fracture threshold to categorize individual risk could provide a more objective basis for clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3426885     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(87)90001-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  18 in total

1.  Physical activity and fractures over the age of fifty years.

Authors:  B A Michel; D A Bloch; J F Fries
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone diminution of osteoporotic females at different skeletal sites.

Authors:  C Mautalen; E Vega; G Ghiringhelli; G Fromm
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Bone status assessed by quantitative ultrasound in healthy postmenopausal Polish women: normative data.

Authors:  W Pluskiewicz
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Precision of dual photon absorptiometry measurements: comparison of three different methods of selection of the region of interest.

Authors:  R Valkema; R van den Berg; J A Camps; J A Blokland; S E Papapoulos; O L Bijvoet; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

Review 6.  What constitutes evidence for drug efficacy in osteoporosis?

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Spine deformity index in osteoporotic women: relations to forearm and vertebral bone mineral measurements and to iliac crest ash density.

Authors:  C H Søgaard; A P Hermann; C Hasling; L Mosekilde; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Predicting fractures in women by using forearm bone densitometry.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Velocity of ultrasound at the patella: influence of age, menopause and estrogen replacement therapy.

Authors:  R Lehmann; M Wapniarz; H M Kvasnicka; K Klein; B Allolio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Fracture risk as determined by prospective and retrospective study designs.

Authors:  M R Stegman; R R Recker; K M Davies; R A Ryan; R P Heaney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.