| Literature DB >> 34268839 |
Chiaraluce Moretti1, Fabio Rezzonico2, Benedetta Orfei1, Chiara Cortese1, Alba Moreno-Pérez3,4, Harrold A van den Burg5, Andrea Onofri1, Giuseppe Firrao6, Cayo Ramos3,4, Theo H M Smits2, Roberto Buonaurio1.
Abstract
The endophytic bacterium Pantoea agglomerans DAPP-PG 734 was previously isolated from olive knots caused by infection with Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi DAPP-PG 722. Whole-genome analysis of this P. agglomerans strain revealed the presence of a Hypersensitive response and pathogenicity (Hrp) type III secretion system (T3SS). To assess the role of the P. agglomerans T3SS in the interaction with P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi, we generated independent knockout mutants in three Hrp genes of the P. agglomerans DAPP-PG 734 T3SS (hrpJ, hrpN, and hrpY). In contrast to the wildtype control, all three mutants failed to cause a hypersensitive response when infiltrated in tobacco leaves, suggesting that P. agglomerans T3SS is functional and injects effector proteins in plant cells. In contrast to P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi DAPP-PG 722, the wildtype strain P. agglomerans DAPP-PG 734 and its Hrp T3SS mutants did not cause olive knot disease in 1-year-old olive plants. Coinoculation of P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi with P. agglomerans wildtype strains did not significantly change the knot size, while the DAPP-PG 734 hrpY mutant induced a significant decrease in knot size, which could be complemented by providing hrpY on a plasmid. By epifluorescence microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy, we found that the localization patterns in knots were nonoverlapping for P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi and P. agglomerans when coinoculated. Our results suggest that suppression of olive plant defences mediated by the Hrp T3SS of P. agglomerans DAPP-PG 734 positively impacts the virulence of P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi DAPP-PG 722.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Pantoea agglomeranszzm321990; Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi; Pseudomonas syringae complex; T3SS; endophyte; hypersensitive reaction; mutant; olive knot community
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34268839 PMCID: PMC8435235 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.13105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Plant Pathol ISSN: 1364-3703 Impact factor: 5.663
FIGURE 1Phylogenomic core genome tree of the Pantoea spp. analysed in this study constructed using FastTree in EDGAR and the presence of Hrp type III secretion systems in individual strains, as indicated by different coloured boxes (Hrp‐1, orange; Hrp‐2, green; Hrp‐3, blue). Grey boxes indicate absence in the respective strain. Species delineation based on ANI values >95% are indicated using coloured boxes for each species
FIGURE 2Hrp clusters in Pantoea spp. All Hrp‐1 and representative species for other Hrp type III secretion systems (T3SSs) are shown. Green arrows represent Hrp‐1 structural and effector genes, red arrows are frameshifted genes. In Hrp‐2 and Hrp‐3 T3SS, light green arrows indicate lower sequence identity to the genes in Hrp‐1. The SPI‐1 and SPI‐2 clusters are given with orange arrows. Additional colours: light blue, plasmid‐related genes; purple, transposon‐related genes; grey, conserved genes; white, unrelated genes. The red asterisks at the line for Pantoea agglomerans DAPP‐PG 734 indicate the presence of Hrp boxes (see Table S1)
FIGURE 3Unrooted neighbour‐joining tree of concatenated HrcC‐HrcN‐HrcU‐HrcV protein sequences of Hrp type III secretion systems (T3SSs). Bootstrap values (1,000 repeats) are indicated at the branches. The Hrp T3SS systems discussed in this paper are indicated in bold
Effectors in the genomes of Pantoea spp. containing the Hrp‐1 T3SS
| Effector | Reference sequence (locus tag) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| GS10_RS0103295 | + | + | + | + | − | + | − |
|
| GS10_RS0103285 | + | + | + | − | − | − | − |
|
| GS10_RS0103270 | + | + | + | − | − | − | − |
|
| GS10_RS0103265 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
|
| A7P61_RS08055 | − | − | − | + | − | + | − |
|
| A7P62_RS10595 | − | − | − | − | + | + | − |
|
| A7P61_RS11580 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| A7P62_RS00640 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| A7P62_RS00650 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| A7P62_RS00655 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| A7P62_RS10630 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| A7P62_RS10725 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| A7P62_RS10575 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| A7P62_RS18080 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| A7P61_RS24765 | − | − | − | − | + | + | − |
FIGURE 4Hypersensitive response on tobacco leaf 24 hr after inoculation with Pantoea agglomerans DAPP‐PG 734 (wild type) or the mutants PagΔhrpJ, PagΔhrpN, PagΔhrpY, and the complemented strain PagΔhrpY[pBBR::hrpY]
FIGURE 5Effect of inoculation of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi DAPP‐PG 722 (Psav) alone or in combination with Pantoea agglomerans (Pag) DAPP‐PG 734 or its derivative mutants on knot formation (a, c) and in planta population dynamics (b). (a) Knot formation, expressed as stem overgrowth observed 60 days postinoculation (dpi), in 1‐year‐old olive (cv. Frantoio) stems inoculated with Psav alone or in combination with Pag or PagΔhrpJ, PagΔhrpN, PagΔhrpY. Each value is the mean ± SE of three replicates. Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05) according to Duncan's multiple range test. (b) Growth of Psav, Pag or PagΔhrpJ, PagΔhrpN, PagΔhrpY alone or in combination in olive (cv. Frantoio) plants. The symbols indicate observed bacterial counts and the lines indicate the linear mixed model fit (blue, Psav; red, Pag and its mutants). For each bacterial species, different letters indicate a significant difference between growth curves. Vertical bars show standard errors. (c) Knot formation, expressed as stem overgrowth observed 60 dpi, in 1‐year‐old olive (cv. Frantoio) stems inoculated with Psav alone or in combination with Pag or PagΔhrpY, or complemented strain PagΔhrpY[pBBR::hrpY]. Each value is the mean ± SE of four replicates. Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.01) according to Duncan's multiple range test
FIGURE 6In planta localization of RFP‐labelled Pantoea agglomerans DAPP‐PG 734 (Pag‐DRE) and GFP‐labelled Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi DAPP‐PG 722 (Psav‐GFP). (a, b) Epifluorescence microscopy of olive knots developed at 28 days postinoculation (dpi) in micropropagated olive plants. Knots induced by (a) independent inoculations of Pag‐DRE and Psav‐GFP or (b) by coinoculation of Pag‐DRE and Psav‐GFP. The diffused red colouration observed in (a) is due to the red autofluorescence of the plant. Images were acquired without filter (bright field), with a GFP filter or with an RFP filter. Merged, fusion of the GFP and RFP images. Bars = 2 mm. (c) Population dynamics of Pag‐DRE in in vitro olive plants inoculated alone (Psav‐GFP alone) or in combination with Psav‐GFP (Pag‐DRE + Psav‐GFP) at zero (white column) and 30 (grey columns) dpi. Psav‐GFP alone, population of Psav‐GFP inoculated alone. Each value is the mean of six replicates ± SE (bars). Statistical significance was calculated using Student's t test (*p = 0.05)
FIGURE 7Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of transversal sections of olive knots induced by coinoculation of RFP‐labelled Pantoea agglomerans DAPP‐PG 734 (Pag‐DRE) and GFP‐labelled Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi DAPP‐PG 722 (Psav‐GFP) at 28 days postinoculation (a). (b) Detail of the squared region marked in (a). (c) Graphic representation of the RFP and GFP fluorescence intensities emitted along the area marked with a white line. The arrows indicate a spot where both fluorescence signals overlap. Bars = 25 µm
Bacterial strains isolated from the olive knots, plasmids, and primers used in this study
| Strains | Relevant characteristics | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| DAPP‐PG 734 (wild type) | Olive knot (Italy) | Hosni et al. ( | |
| DAPP‐PG 768 | This study | ||
| DAPP‐PG 769 | This study | ||
| DAPP‐PG 770 | This study | ||
| DAPP‐PG 770 (pBBRMCS5‐ | This study | ||
| DAPP‐PG 734 (pBBR2‐DsRedExpress) | This study | ||
| DAPP‐PG 722 | Olive knot (Italy) | Hosni et al. ( | |
| DAPP‐PG 722 (pLRM1:GFP) | This study | ||
|
| |||
| DH5α | Hanahan ( | ||
| HB101 | Figurski and Helinski ( | ||
|
| |||
| pKNOCK‐Km | Conjugative suicide vector; KmR | ||
| pKNOCK‐ | Internal | Alexeyev ( | |
| pKNOCK‐ | Internal | This study | |
| pKNOCK‐ | Internal | This study | |
| pBBRMCS5 | Broad‐host‐range cloning vector; GmR | Kovach et al. ( | |
| pBBRMCS5‐ | pBBRMCS5 with 0.642‐kb | This study | |
| pBBR2‐DsRedExpress | pBBRMCS2::miniTn | Passos da Silva et al. ( | |
| pLRM1‐GFP | pBBRMCS5::PA1/04/03‐RBSII‐GFPmut3*‐T0‐T1, GmR | Rodríguez‐Moreno et al. ( | |
| pGEM‐T Easy | Cloning vector; AmpR | Promega | |
| pRK2013 | Mobilization helper plasmid | Figurski and Helinski ( | |
|
| |||
| hrpJ For | 5ʹ‐GGAGAAAGGGGCTGAAGTCT‐3ʹ | This study | |
| hrpJ Rev | 5ʹ‐AACATGTTGCTGGCGGTTAG‐3ʹ | This study | |
| hrpN For | 5ʹ‐GCATGTTTGGCGATCAGGAT‐3ʹ | This study | |
| hrpN Rev | 5ʹ‐CCGAATTTGCGCTCTTCTGA‐3ʹ | This study | |
| hrpY For | 5ʹ‐CGGGTAATGGTGCTCAGGTA‐3ʹ | This study | |
| hrpY Rev | 5ʹ‐TATCTGCTCGGCCAGAACAT‐3ʹ | This study | |
| hrpY compl 1 | 5ʹ‐CTCGAGAGGAGGATGGATAATAATATTCGCCTG‐3ʹ | This study | |
| hrpY compl 2 | 5ʹ‐CCTAGGGATAGCATATTTCACTATGTCAGCATTGG‐3ʹ | This study | |
Nitrof, nitrofurantoin; Km, kanamycin; Gm, gentamycin; Amp, ampicillin; Sm, streptomycin.