Tiziana Rancati1, Laura Lozza2, Lara Bellardita1, Riccardo Ray Colciago3, Sarah Frasca2, Maria Carmen De Santis4, Simona Gay1, Federica Palorini1, Eliana La Rocca2,5, Riccardo Valdagni1,3,2,5. 1. Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 2. Radiation Oncology 1 Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 3. Department of Radiotherapy, Università Degli Studi Di Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy. 4. Radiation Oncology 1 Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. MariaCarmen.DeSantis@istitutotumori.mi.it. 5. Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
AIM: To explore breast cancer patient's perspective on future genetic testing for prediction of toxicity after breast radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved patient enrolled in the Italian branch of the REQUITE project conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Milan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted within one month from the end of radiotherapy treatment by two radiation oncologists and a radiotherapy technician previously trained by a clinical psychologist with experience in the oncology field. Semi-structured interviews are characterized by a set of pre-defined questions and developed ad hoc by researchers in Leicester within the REQUITE project. The interview questions investigated interest in undergoing the genetic test and expectations on its usefulness and disadvantages. RESULTS: Eighteen interviews were conducted and analysed. Forty-five initial codes were combined into nine themes which were then clustered in two main macro-areas (i) Opportunities and (ii) Challenges. Overall, all patients understand the aim of the genetic test and considered its intrinsic opportunity to make the physician more confident with the treatment. Regarding side effects, most of patients felt prepared to RT but not without fear. Many women considered important to have the largest and reliable information, also about negative experiences. Prevailing emotions were anxiety and fear but not connected to genetic test's result. CONCLUSIONS: A genetic test could be an opportunity because generate knowledge and give patients a dynamic role in the decision-making approach. Prediction of single patient radiosensitivity before RT could prompt suggestion to entail a more and more tailored radiation treatment in the era of personalized approach.
AIM: To explore breast cancerpatient's perspective on future genetic testing for prediction of toxicity after breast radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved patient enrolled in the Italian branch of the REQUITE project conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Milan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted within one month from the end of radiotherapy treatment by two radiation oncologists and a radiotherapy technician previously trained by a clinical psychologist with experience in the oncology field. Semi-structured interviews are characterized by a set of pre-defined questions and developed ad hoc by researchers in Leicester within the REQUITE project. The interview questions investigated interest in undergoing the genetic test and expectations on its usefulness and disadvantages. RESULTS: Eighteen interviews were conducted and analysed. Forty-five initial codes were combined into nine themes which were then clustered in two main macro-areas (i) Opportunities and (ii) Challenges. Overall, all patients understand the aim of the genetic test and considered its intrinsic opportunity to make the physician more confident with the treatment. Regarding side effects, most of patients felt prepared to RT but not without fear. Many women considered important to have the largest and reliable information, also about negative experiences. Prevailing emotions were anxiety and fear but not connected to genetic test's result. CONCLUSIONS: A genetic test could be an opportunity because generate knowledge and give patients a dynamic role in the decision-making approach. Prediction of single patient radiosensitivity before RT could prompt suggestion to entail a more and more tailored radiation treatment in the era of personalized approach.
Authors: R Lewis; N Williams; H E Matar; N Din; D Fitzsimmons; C Phillips; M Jones; A Sutton; K Burton; S Nafees; M Hendry; I Rickard; R Chakraverty; C Wilkinson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: L Livi; I Meattini; V Scotti; C Saieva; G Simontacchi; L Marrazzo; C Franzese; S Cassani; F Paiar; V Di Cataldo; J Nori; L Jose Sanchez; S Bianchi; L Cataliotti; G Biti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Petra Seibold; Adam Webb; Miguel E Aguado-Barrera; David Azria; Celine Bourgier; Muriel Brengues; Erik Briers; Renée Bultijnck; Patricia Calvo-Crespo; Ana Carballo; Ananya Choudhury; Alessandro Cicchetti; Johannes Claßen; Elena Delmastro; Alison M Dunning; Rebecca M Elliott; Laura Fachal; Marie-Pierre Farcy-Jacquet; Pietro Gabriele; Elisabetta Garibaldi; Antonio Gómez-Caamaño; Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Daniel S Higginson; Kerstie Johnson; Ramón Lobato-Busto; Meritxell Mollà; Anusha Müller; Debbie Payne; Paula Peleteiro; Giselle Post; Tiziana Rancati; Tim Rattay; Victoria Reyes; Barry S Rosenstein; Dirk De Ruysscher; Maria Carmen De Santis; Jörg Schäfer; Thomas Schnabel; Elena Sperk; R Paul Symonds; Hilary Stobart; Begoña Taboada-Valladares; Christopher J Talbot; Riccardo Valdagni; Ana Vega; Liv Veldeman; Tim Ward; Christian Weißenberger; Catharine M L West; Jenny Chang-Claude Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Christina Sinding; Pamela Hudak; Jennifer Wiernikowski; Jane Aronson; Pat Miller; Judy Gould; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Igino Simonetti; Federico Bruno; Roberta Fusco; Carmen Cutolo; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Renato Patrone; Carlo Masciocchi; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Francesco Arrigoni; Carmine Picone; Andrea Belli; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Antonio Barile; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo; Vincenza Granata Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-07-16