| Literature DB >> 34268289 |
Hua-Lei Yang1, Yuan-Yang Wu1, Xue-Yu Lin1, Lin Xie2, Shuo Zhang1, Si-Qing Zhang1, Shi-Ming Ti1, Xiao-Dong Zheng3.
Abstract
Purpose: The research objectives of this study are to test the scientific propositions of whether Internet use promotes life satisfaction among the elderly, whether there is variability in the effect of Internet use on the well-being of the elderly, and through what channels Internet use affects the elderly's life satisfaction. Method: Using data from the 2017 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), this paper employed linear regression, ordered logit model, and the propensity score matching (PSM) approach to investigate the association of Internet use with life satisfaction among the elderly in China.Entities:
Keywords: China; elderly; internet use; life satisfaction; subjective welfare
Year: 2021 PMID: 34268289 PMCID: PMC8275954 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.677643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Variables.
| Life satisfaction | Very dissatisfied = 1, Dissatisfied = 2, Neutral = 3, Satisfied = 4, Very satisfied = 5 |
| Use of the Internet | Use Internet = 1, not use Internet = 0 |
| Frequency of Internet use | Never = 1, Rarely = 2, Sometimes = 3, Frequent = 4, Very Frequent = 5 |
| Gender | Male = 1, Female = 0 |
| Age | Derived by survey year minus the respondent's birth year |
| Ethnic | Han = 1, non-Han = 0 (including all minor ethnics) |
| Registered residence | Non-agricultural household registration = 1 |
| Political status | Member of the Communist Party of China (CCP) = 1; others = 0 |
| Education | Uneducated = 0, Private school = 3, Elementary school = 6, Junior high school = 9, Senior high school or technical school = 12, College degree = 15, Bachelor's degree or above = 16 |
| Health status | Very unhealthy = 1, unhealthy = 2, moderately healthy = 3, Healthy = 4, Very healthy = 5 |
| Number of family members | Total number of family members |
| Housing situation | Owning at least one house = 1, not owning a house = 0 |
| Annual income | Annual income in 2016, transformed by the logarithm |
| Sense of social fairness | Generally speaking, do you think that today's society is fair or unfair? There are five levels from low to high, and higher numerical values represent that feel the society is fairer. |
| Friends gatherings | In the past year, the frequency of gatherings with friends was never = 1, several times a year or less = 2, several times a month = 3, several times a week = 4, every day = 5 |
Private school is a kind of folk early childhood education institution opened within the family, clan, or village in ancient Chinese society. It was a school run by private individuals in ancient and centered on Confucianism.
Descriptive statistics.
| Registered residence (%) | |||||
| Life satisfaction | 3.83 | 0.83 | Agricultural | 60.49% | |
| Non-agricultural | 39.51% | ||||
| Internet use | CCP (%) | 15.03% | |||
| Internet user (%) | 23.51% | 0.42 | Education (%) | ||
| Frequency (%) | Uneducated | 23.29% | |||
| Never | 76.49% | Elementary school or private school | 32.36% | ||
| Rarely | 4.76% | Junior high school | 24.33% | ||
| Sometimes | 4.61% | Senior high school | 13.02% | ||
| Frequent | 6.92% | College degree | 7% | ||
| Very frequent | 7.22% | Health | 3.00 | 1.05 | |
| Family members | 2.44 | 1.41 | |||
| Age | 69.30 | 7.29 | House owner (%) | 68.60% | |
| Male (%) | 47.62% | Family income (ln) | 10.3 | 2.83 | |
| Ethnic (%) | 93.53% | ||||
| Sense of social fairness | 2.11 | 1.05 | |||
| Friends gatherings | 3.27 | 1.03 | |||
Estimated impact of Internet use on life satisfaction.
| Internet use | −0.189 | −0.520 | ||
| (0.0577) | (0.151) | |||
| Frequency of Internet use | −0.059 | −0.167 | ||
| (0.018) | (0.049) | |||
| Age | 0.0110 | 0.030 | 0.011 | 0.030 |
| (0.003) | (0.008) | (0.003) | (0.008) | |
| Gender | −0.087 | −0.248 | −0.085 | −0.241 |
| (0.047) | (0.121) | (0.047) | (0.121) | |
| Ethnic | −0.150 | −0.533 | −0.150 | −0.536 |
| (0.100) | (0.270) | (0.100) | (0.273) | |
| Registered residence | 0.057 | 0.209 | 0.053 | 0.205 |
| (0.052) | (0.136) | (0.052) | (0.137) | |
| Political status | 0.065 | 0.134 | 0.067 | 0.148 |
| (0.0599) | (0.164) | (0.061) | (0.164) | |
| Education | 0.015 | 0.040 | 0.014 | 0.038 |
| (0.006) | (0.016) | (0.006) | (0.016) | |
| Health | 0.195 | 0.477 | 0.195 | 0.477 |
| (0.024) | (0.065) | (0.024) | (0.064) | |
| Flic | 0.025 | 0.073 | 0.024 | 0.073 |
| (0.016) | (0.043) | (0.017) | (0.044) | |
| Housing | 0.071 | 0.133 | 0.073 | 0.140 |
| (0.053) | (0.133) | (0.053) | (0.133) | |
| Annual income | 0.023 | 0.057 | 0.023 | 0.0563 |
| (0.009) | (0.022) | (0.009) | (0.022) | |
| Cons | 2.235 | 2.301 | ||
| (0.284) | (0.287) | |||
| Cut 1 | −0.246 | −0.438 | ||
| (0.752) | (0.762) | |||
| Cut 2 | 1.557 | 1.365 | ||
| (0.723) | (0.732) | |||
| Cut 3 | 2.595 | 2.402 | ||
| (0.721) | (0.729) | |||
| Cut 4 | 5.897 | 5.703 | ||
| (0.743) | (0.751) | |||
| 1,344 | 1,344 | 1,344 | 1,344 | |
| 0.099 | 0.050 | 0.099 | 0.046 |
Standard errors are reported in the parentheses;
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
The average treatment effect of Internet use on life satisfaction.
| K-nearest neighbor matching | 3.844 | 3.971 | −0.126 | 0.065 | −1.95 |
| Radius matching | 3.844 | 3.996 | −0.152 | 0.058 | −2.61 |
| Kernel matching | 3.844 | 4.005 | −0.161 | 0.059 | −2.72 |
| Locally linear matching | 3.844 | 4.003 | −0.159 | 0.063 | −2.50 |
***, **, and * indicate the variable's significance at the statistical level of 1, 5, and 10%, respectively; the standard error after matching is obtained by the Bootstrap with a sample size of 1,000. Standard errors are reported in column 5.
Heterogeneity analysis of the impact of Internet use on life satisfaction.
| Net | −0.171 | −0.245 | 0.149 | −0.206 | −0.167 |
| (0.0731) | (0.112) | (0.186) | (0.079) | (0.083) | |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 787 | 399 | 158 | 640 | 704 | |
| 0.109 | 0.121 | 0.150 | 0.110 | 0.108 | |
| Net | −0.406 | −0.060 | −0.144 | −0.208 | −0.123 |
| (0.138) | (0.071) | (0.150) | (0.072) | (0.099) | |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 748 | 502 | 94 | 531 | 813 | |
| 0.077 | 0.129 | 0.427 | 0.117 | 0.088 | |
| Net | −0.261 | −0.169 | −0.193 | −0.155 | −0.377 |
| (0.164) | (0.0967) | (0.0752) | (0.058) | (0.243) | |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 444 | 445 | 455 | 892 | 452 | |
| 0.055 | 0.052 | 0.133 | 0.109 | 0.075 | |
Standard errors are reported in the parentheses;
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
Estimation results of mediating effects.
| Variables | Fairness | Satisfy | Friends gatherings | Satisfy |
| Net | −0.262 | −0.129 | 0.351 | −0.187 |
| (0.0785) | (0.0568) | (0.073) | (0.058) | |
| Fairness | 0.229 | |||
| (0.0252) | ||||
| Friends gatherings | −0.005 | |||
| (0.0227) | ||||
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 1,336 | 1,336 | 1,343 | 1,343 | |
| 0.048 | 0.176 | 0.062 | 0.099 | |
| −0.060 | −0.002(0.008) |
Social fairness perception is divided into five levels: The higher the level, the more you feel you are treated fairly; depression is divided into five levels: The higher the level, the higher the level of depression; friends gathering here refers specifically to the frequency of gathering; there are five levels in the questionnaire: The higher the level, the more frequency. Standard errors are reported in the parentheses;
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.