| Literature DB >> 35692319 |
Wei-Chao Chen1, Liu Yang1, Xiao-Yan Wang2.
Abstract
With the rapid expansion of the Internet, it continuously penetrates the life of older adults around the world. This study aims to explore the effect of Internet use on the multi-dimensional health of the elderly with the mediating role of cultural engagement. Using data from the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) in 2015 and 2017, this study adopts logistic regression and a single-step multiple mediation model to investigate how Internet use affects the multi-dimensional health of older adults in China. The results show that Internet use has positive effects on the self-rated health, physical health, and mental health of the elderly. Endogenous tests, robustness analysis, and sensitivity analysis show that the above conclusions remain robust. Additionally, the mediating effect analysis shows that cultural engagement plays a mediating role in the relationship between Internet use and the three health-related responses. Therefore, to improve the elderly's health level, the government should not only cultivate the ability to use the Internet but also encourage greater cultural engagement amongst the aged.Entities:
Keywords: cultural engagement; influence mechanism; internet use; multi-dimensional health; older adults
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35692319 PMCID: PMC9185139 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.887840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Flowchart of sample selection and preprocessing (n represents sample size).
Descriptive statistics of all variables.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variables | Self-rated health | Unhealthy = 0, healthy = 1 | 0.3968 | 0.4892 | |
| Physical health | 0.5471 | 0.4978 | |||
| Mental health | 0.6505 | 0.4768 | |||
| Independent variables | Internet use | No use = 0, Use = 1 | 0.2245 | 0.4173 | |
| Mediating variables | Cultural engagement | A higher score represents a greater cultural engagement. | 6.3244 | 2.4192 | |
| Demographic fctors | Gender | Female = 0, Male = 1 | 0.4840 | 0.4997 | |
| Control variables (Denoted by | Age | Continuous (ranging from 60 to 103) | 69.1932 | 7.2770 | |
| Household | Agricultural household = 0, Non-agricultural household = 1 | 0.5413 | 0.4983 | ||
| Education | Primary school = 1,Junior high school, Senior high school = 2, College and above = 3 | 1.5492 | 0.6378 | ||
| Annual income | Annual income (by logarithm) | 9.4236 | 1.3891 | ||
| Living region | Eastern | Eastern area = 1, Others = 0 | 0.4601 | 0.4984 | |
| Central | Central area = 1, Others = 0 | 0.3199 | 0.4665 | ||
| Social-psychosocial perception | Subjective wellbeing | Five levels from low to high | 3.9606 | 0.8002 | |
| Social trust | Five levels from low to high | 3.6434 | 0.9301 | ||
| Subjective class | Five classes from lower to upper | 2.4437 | 0.8572 | ||
Logistic regression estimation results of Internet use on multi-dimensional health.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Internet use | 0.1552 | 0.3250 | 0.2033 |
| Gender | −0.3478 | −0.3054 | −0.2425 |
| Age | −0.0228 | −0.0323 | −0.0052 (0.004) |
| Household | −0.1293 | 0.1975 | 0.0551 (0.082) |
| Education | −0.0574 (0.053) | −0.0289 | 0.0551 (0.059) |
| Annual income | 0.1560 | 0.2251 | 0.1713 |
| East | 0.1550 | 0.4864 | 0.4816 |
| Central | 0.2008 | 0.2494 | 0.3487 |
| Subjective wellbeing | 0.5072 | 0.4292 | 0.6803 |
| Social trust | 0.0879 | 0.1358 | 0.0918 |
| Subjective class | 0.2032 | 0.1864 | 0.1818 |
|
| 6,066 | 6,066 | 6,066 |
| Chi-square ( | 5.165( | 6.708 ( | 5.504 ( |
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01 (Standard errors are in parentheses).
The treatment of endogeneity: instrumental variable model.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instrumental variable (provincial Internet penetration rates) | 0.0073 | |||
| Internet use | 0.8832 | 0.1462 | 0.2918 | |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sample size | 6,066 | 6,066 | 6,066 | 6,066 |
| 0.2780 | ||||
| F value of the first-stage regression | 213.28 ( | |||
p < 0.1,
,
p < 0.01.
Results of balance test.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| ||||
| Gender | U | 0.448 | 0.494 | −9.3 | −3.03 | 0.002 |
| M | 0.453 | 0.459 | −1.2 | −0.32 | 0.748 | |
| Age | U | 66.889 | 69.860 | −43.6 | −13.47 | 0.000 |
| M | 67.006 | 66.958 | 0.7 | 0.20 | 0.843 | |
| Household | U | 0.872 | 0.446 | 100.5 | 29.71 | 0.000 |
| M | 0.869 | 0.864 | 1.2 | 0.38 | 0.705 | |
| Education | U | 2.071 | 1.398 | 114.0 | 38.19 | 0.000 |
| M | 2.051 | 2.060 | −1.5 | −0.38 | 0.707 | |
| Annual income | U | 10.417 | 9.136 | 110.5 | 32.48 | 0.000 |
| M | 10.393 | 10.371 | 1.9 | 0.61 | 0.542 | |
| Subjective wellbeing | U | 4.021 | 3.943 | 10.2 | 3.18 | 0.001 |
| M | 4.019 | 3.996 | 3.1 | 0.80 | 0.425 | |
| Social trust | U | 3.541 | 3.673 | −13.9 | −4.62 | 0.000 |
| M | 3.542 | 3.513 | 3.1 | 0.77 | 0.443 | |
| Subjective class | U | 2.600 | 2.399 | 23.8 | 7.67 | 0.000 |
| M | 2.586 | 2.588 | −0.2 | −0.06 | 0.949 | |
The results in the table are obtained by using the radius matching method.
The average treatment effect of Internet use on self-rated health.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before the match ATT | 0.470 | 0.375 | 0.095 | 0.015 | 6.34 |
| After the match ATT | |||||
| K-nearest neighbor matching (k = 4) | 0.470 | 0.428 | 0.042 | 0.023 | 1.83 |
| Radius matching method | 0.467 | 0.423 | 0.043 | 0.021 | 2.06 |
| Kernel matching | 0.470 | 0.375 | 0.095 | 0.015 | 2.31 |
| Caliper nearest neighbor matching | 0.468 | 0.427 | 0.041 | 0.022 | 1.80 |
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
Regression results by household.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Internet use | 0.1707 | 0.3620 | 0.2113 | 0.1204 | 0.1994 | 0.1356 |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Chi-square / | 3.435 ( | 9.570 ( | 9.283 ( | 5.033 ( | 7.100 ( | 12.329 ( |
|
| 3,859 | 2,207 | ||||
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
Regression results by household.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Internet use | 0.3501 | 0.3762 | 0.1720 | 0.1408 | 0.2878 | 0.1758 |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Chi-square / | 0.765 ( | 10.685 ( | 2.716 ( | 3.154 ( | 10.965 ( | 19.366 ( |
|
| 2,782 | 3,284 | ||||
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
The mediating effect of cultural engagement.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Self-rated health | Mediating effect | 0.016 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.023 |
| Direct effect | 0.021 | 0.017 | −0.013 | 0.055 | |
| Total effect | 0.037 | 0.017 | 0.004 | 0.071 | |
| Physical health | Mediating effect | 0.020 | 0.003 | 0.014 | 0.027 |
| Direct effect | 0.047 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.082 | |
| Total effect | 0.067 | 0.017 | 0.036 | 0.100 | |
| Mental health | Mediating effect | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Direct effect | 0.028 | 0.015 | −0.002 | 0.060 | |
| Total effect | 0.036 | 0.015 | 0.008 | 0.068 | |