Literature DB >> 34267398

Combined Approach to Multi-Informant Data Using Latent Factors and Latent Classes: Trifactor Mixture Model.

Eunsook Kim1, Nathaniel von der Embse1.   

Abstract

Although collecting data from multiple informants is highly recommended, methods to model the congruence and incongruence between informants are limited. Bauer and colleagues suggested the trifactor model that decomposes the variances into common factor, informant perspective factors, and item-specific factors. This study extends their work to the trifactor mixture model that combines the trifactor model and the mixture model. This combined approach allows researchers to investigate the common and unique perspectives of multiple informants on targets using latent factors and simultaneously take into account potential heterogeneity of targets using latent classes. We demonstrate this model using student self-rated and teacher-rated academic behaviors (N = 24,094). Model specification and testing procedures are explicated in detail. Methodological and practical issues in conducting the trifactor mixture analysis are discussed.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congruence; factor analysis; informants; latent class; mixture; raters

Year:  2020        PMID: 34267398      PMCID: PMC8243203          DOI: 10.1177/0013164420973722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   3.088


  23 in total

1.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Shaobo Zhang; Kristopher J Preacher; Derek D Rucker
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

2.  Testing informant discrepancies as predictors of early adolescent psychopathology: why difference scores cannot tell you what you want to know and how polynomial regression may.

Authors:  Robert D Laird; Andres De Los Reyes
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-01

3.  Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models.

Authors:  Gitta H Lubke; Bengt Muthén
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-03

4.  Cross-Level Group Measurement Invariance When Groups Are at Different Levels of Multilevel Data.

Authors:  Eun Sook Kim; Yan Wang; Sarah M Kiefer
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.

Authors:  Mijke Rhemtulla; Patricia É Brosseau-Liard; Victoria Savalei
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-07-16

6.  Multi-informant universal screening: Evaluation of rater, item, and construct variance using a trifactor model.

Authors:  Nathaniel von der Embse; Eun Sook Kim; Stephen Kilgus; Robert Dedrick; Alexis Sanchez
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2019-11-22

7.  The Clinical Significance of Informant Agreement in Externalizing Behavior from Age 3 to 14.

Authors:  Isabelle Roskam
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2018-08

8.  Introduction to the special section: More than measurement error: Discovering meaning behind informant discrepancies in clinical assessments of children and adolescents.

Authors:  Andres De Los Reyes
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2011

9.  Models and Strategies for Factor Mixture Analysis: An Example Concerning the Structure Underlying Psychological Disorders.

Authors:  Shaunna L Clark; Bengt Muthén; Jaakko Kaprio; Brian M D'Onofrio; Richard Viken; Richard J Rose
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.125

10.  Testing Measurement Invariance Across Unobserved Groups: The Role of Covariates in Factor Mixture Modeling.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Eunsook Kim; John M Ferron; Robert F Dedrick; Tony X Tan; Stephen Stark
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.