Literature DB >> 34265178

Best Practices in Large Database Clinical Epidemiology Research in Hepatology: Barriers and Opportunities.

Nadim Mahmud1,2, David S Goldberg3, Therese Bittermann1,2.   

Abstract

With advances in computing and information technology, large health care research databases are becoming increasingly accessible to investigators across the world. These rich, population-level data sources can serve many purposes, such as to generate "real-world evidence," to enhance disease phenotyping, or to identify unmet clinical needs, among others. This is of particular relevance to the study of patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), a socioeconomically and clinically heterogeneous population that is frequently under-represented in clinical trials. This review describes the recommended "best practices" in the execution, reporting, and interpretation of large database clinical epidemiology research in hepatology. The advantages and limitations of selected data sources are reviewed, as well as important concepts on data linkages. The appropriate classification of exposures and outcomes is addressed, and the strategies needed to overcome limitations of the data and minimize bias are explained as they pertain to patients with ESLD and/or liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Lastly, selected statistical concepts are reviewed, from model building to analytic decision making and hypothesis testing. The purpose of this review is to provide the practical insights and knowledge needed to ensure successful and impactful research using large clinical databases in the modern era and advance the study of ESLD and LT.
Copyright © 2021 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34265178      PMCID: PMC8688188          DOI: 10.1002/lt.26231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  40 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of observational studies.

Authors:  P Jepsen; S P Johnsen; M W Gillman; H T Sørensen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Marginal Structural Models: unbiased estimation for longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Erica E M Moodie; D A Stephens
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 3.  Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores.

Authors:  D B Rubin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Big Data Science: Opportunities and Challenges to Address Minority Health and Health Disparities in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Xinzhi Zhang; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Philip E Bourne; Emmanuel Peprah; O Kenrik Duru; Nancy Breen; David Berrigan; Fred Wood; James S Jackson; David W S Wong; Joshua Denny
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  What is your research question? An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians.

Authors:  John J Riva; Keshena M P Malik; Stephen J Burnie; Andrea R Endicott; Jason W Busse
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-09

6.  Big Data in Transplantation Practice-the Devil Is in the Detail-Fontan-associated Liver Disease.

Authors:  Michelle H Kim; Ailene Nguyen; Mary Lo; Subramanyan Ram Kumar; John Bucuvalas; Earl F Glynn; Mark A Hoffman; Ryan Fischer; Juliet Emamaullee
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims.

Authors:  A B Massie; L M Kucirka; L M Kuricka; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Trends in burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma by underlying liver disease in US veterans, 2001-2013.

Authors:  Lauren A Beste; Steven L Leipertz; Pamela K Green; Jason A Dominitz; David Ross; George N Ioannou
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Identifying Patients With Hepatic Encephalopathy Using Administrative Data in the ICD-10 Era.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Sophia Korovaichuk; Jad Baki; Sydni Williams; Samantha Nikirk; Akbar K Waljee; Neehar D Parikh
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Risk Prediction Models for Post-Operative Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Nadim Mahmud; Zachary Fricker; Rebecca A Hubbard; George N Ioannou; James D Lewis; Tamar H Taddei; Kenneth D Rothstein; Marina Serper; David S Goldberg; David E Kaplan
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 17.425

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.