| Literature DB >> 34262775 |
Hari Kishan Gonuguntla1, Milap Shah2, Nitesh Gupta3, Sumita Agrawal4, Venerino Poletti5, Gustavo Cumbo Nacheli6.
Abstract
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is preferred for evaluating malignant lymph nodes and staging of lung cancer. Nevertheless, larger tissue samples are increasingly needed, particularly for molecular analysis. We describe the feasibility, technical details, and complications of EBUS-guided transbronchial cryo-node biopsy (TBCNB) in four patients with mediastinal adenopathy. The samples obtained by EBUS-TBCNB in all cases were adequate for histopathological examination (HPE) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. In case 1, HPE showed non-caseating epithelioid granuloma with giant cells and fibrosis consistent with sarcoidosis. Case 2 was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma with positivity for ROS1(D4D6). Case 3 showed features of metastatic adenocarcinoma from the breast (positive for Her2, ER, and GATA3). Case 4 was diagnosed with tuberculosis (necrotizing granuloma in histopathology, stain with Ziehl-Neelsen that showed few rod-shaped bacilli). Only one patient had minimal bleeding at the puncture site controlled with cold saline. There were no adverse events such as major bleeding, pneumomediastinum, or pneumothorax.Entities:
Keywords: Cryo‐biopsy; endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration; lymph nodes; mediastinum
Year: 2021 PMID: 34262775 PMCID: PMC8264746 DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respirol Case Rep ISSN: 2051-3380
Characteristics of lymph node, ROSE, and TBNCB in the four patients.
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enlarged lymph node stations | 7, 4L, 4R, 10R, 10L, 11L | 7, 4L, 11L | 4L, 11L | 7, 4R |
| Size (cm) | >1 | >1 | >1 | >1 |
| Shape | Oval | Oval | Oval | Round |
| Margin | Indistinct | Distinct | Distinct | Indistinct |
| Echogenicity | Homogenous | Heterogenous | Homogenous | Heterogenous |
| Central hilar structure | No | Yes | No | No |
| Vascular pattern | Avascular | Avascular | Hilar | Non‐hilar, central |
| Elastography pattern | II | III | III | II |
| Visual appearance of aspirate | Lymphoid | Lymphoid and bloody | Black | Lymphoid |
| Lymph node station from which EBUS‐TBNA was done | 7, 11L | 7, 11L | 4L, 11L | 7 |
| EBUS‐TBNA needle size (G) | 21 | 21 | 19 | 22 |
| ROSE adequacy | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate |
| ROSE diagnosis | Granulomatous inflammation | Adenocarcinoma | Atypical cells | Granulomatous inflammation with caseous necrosis |
| Lymph node station from which TBCNB was done | 7 | 7 | 11L | 7 |
| Number of cryo‐biopsies obtained | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| HPE diagnosis from TBCNB | Sarcoidosis | Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic adenocarcinoma | Tuberculosis |
| Complications | Nil | Nil | Nil | Minimal bleeding |
EBUS‐TBNA, endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration; HPE, histopathological examination; ROSE, rapid onsite evaluation; TBCNB; transbronchial cryo‐node biopsy.
Figure 1(A) Performing endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA)—EBUS image showing a 19‐G needle in station 11L node; steps of inserting 1.1 mm cryo‐probe through the puncture site made by TBNA needle, (B) tip of cryo‐probe at the puncture site, (C) pushing the probe, and (D) a tip of cryo‐probe completely inside the node. (E) EBUS image showing the tip of 1.1 mm cryo‐probe within the lymph node. (F) Olympus EBUS scope (BF‐UC 180F) with 1.1 mm cryo‐probe in the working channel. The tip of the probe has the lymph node tissue obtained by cryo‐nodal biopsy. (G) Bronchoscopic view of the puncture site after taking cryo‐nodal biopsy.
Figure 2Case 1: (A) Non‐contrast computed tomography (CT) thorax demonstrating sub‐carinal and hilar nodes, (B) non‐caseating epithelioid granuloma with giant cells and fibrosis (haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), 40×). CD4 cells (C) are more evident than CD8 cells (D) while few B lymphocytes are highlighted with CD20 (E). Case 2: (F) Contrast CT thorax showing left hilar mass with paratracheal lymph nodes, (G) adenocarcinoma cells (H&E, 10×), (H) with positivity for ROS1(D4D6) (10×). Case 3: (I) Contrast CT showing left interlobar node, (J) metastatic carcinoma from the breast (H&E, 10×), tumour cells are positive for Her2 (K), ER (L), and GATA3 (M). Case 4: (N) Non‐contrast CT of the right para‐hilar lesion with sub‐carinal lymph node, (O) necrotizing granuloma (H&E, 40×), (P) Ziehl–Neelsen stain highlights few pink rod‐shaped bacilli (red arrow), CD8 cells (Q) are more evident than CD4 cells (R) while few B lymphocytes are highlighted with CD20 (S).