| Literature DB >> 36046658 |
Rena Oikonomidou1, Dimitris Petridis2, Christoforos Kosmidis1, Konstantinos Sapalidis1, Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt3, Vagelis Christakidis4, Savas Petanidis5, Dimitris Mathaios6, Eleni Isidora Perdikouri7, Sofia Baka8, Christos Tolis9, Anastasios Vagionas10, Bojan Zaric11, Aris Ioannidis12, Marios Anemoulis13, Konstantinos Porpodis14, Vasileios Papadopoulos15, Paul Zarogoulidis16.
Abstract
Introduction: We have been using cryo-biopsy for endobronchial lesions for lung cancer diagnosis and debulking. Cryo-biopsy is also known to be an excellent tool for diagnosis of lung interstitial disease. Recently cryo-biopsy with the 1.1mm probe was used for lymphnode biopsy. Patients andEntities:
Keywords: 19G needle; 21G needle; 22G needle; Linear-EBUS; bronchoscopy; cancer; cryo-biopsy; lung cancer; radial-ebus
Year: 2022 PMID: 36046658 PMCID: PMC9414011 DOI: 10.7150/jca.75589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.478
Figure 1Age distribution and relevant statistics.
Descriptive statistics of the parameters under study and relevant code notification. The variable Method 2 divides Method into two groups, small needle content, S (categories 1 and 5) and large content, L (categories 2-4).
| N slices | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | N | Mean | Std Dev | Min | Max |
| 0 | 130 | 7,8 | 4,68 | 3 | 19 |
| 1 | 181 | 8,9 | 3,99 | 3 | 22 |
| Method | |||||
| 1 | 49 | 4 | 0,78 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | 54 | 10 | 1,51 | 8 | 14 |
| 3 | 56 | 8,4 | 1,49 | 3 | 11 |
| 4 | 89 | 13 | 4,08 | 7 | 22 |
| 5 | 63 | 4,2 | 1,21 | 3 | 7 |
| Size | |||||
| 1 | 103 | 7,8 | 3,24 | 3 | 17 |
| 2 | 132 | 8,4 | 3,62 | 3 | 18 |
| 3 | 76 | 9,3 | 6,22 | 3 | 22 |
| N cell blocks | |||||
| 0 | 75 | 7,5 | 2,67 | 3 | 12 |
| 1 | 163 | 6,5 | 2,94 | 3 | 14 |
| 2 | 52 | 12 | 3,56 | 4 | 18 |
| 3 | 21 | 18 | 1,8 | 15 | 22 |
| Cancer type | |||||
| 0 | 162 | 8,2 | 4,13 | 3 | 22 |
| 1 | 56 | 8,7 | 4,14 | 3 | 18 |
| 2 | 40 | 7,7 | 4,69 | 3 | 18 |
| 3 | 39 | 7,7 | 4,69 | 3 | 18 |
| 4 | 14 | 13 | 4,68 | 9 | 20 |
| Tissue | |||||
| 0 | 92 | 6,9 | 2,72 | 3 | 12 |
| 1 | 219 | 9 | 4,7 | 3 | 22 |
| Method 2 | |||||
| L | 199 | 11 | 3,47 | 3 | 22 |
| S | 112 | 4,1 | 1,04 | 3 | 7 |
Figure 2Statistical information of the multiple regression of N slices on method groups and N cell blocks (exponentially transformed).
Figure 3Regression plot of N slices on exponentially transformed N cell blocks as divided by the method groups accompanied by the relevant cross-tabulation.
Figure 4In specific (new Figure 4) on the left we can see a cryoprobe 1.1mm pulling out from a lesion a small tissue sample, while on the upper right we can see a 19G Needle and lower right the tissue sample released inside a cytolite plastic bottle.
Adverse effects per method and percentage.
| 19G NEEDLE | CRYOPROBE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HEMORAGE | 2PTS | 17PTS | |
| VENTILATION ISSUES | 10PTS | 25PTS | |
| COST | 520EURO | 1040EURO | ONLY FOR BIOPSY NEEDLE AND CRYO PROBE |
| TIME | 20-30MIN | 30-40MIN |
Figure 5Cryo ERBE system with a new cryo probe tip proposal. As presented the inner area of the tip and only on the sideways will have the cryo effect in order not to destroy the barriers of the lymphnode. Also, the tip should be sharp and the cable probe stronger.