Rubén Caballero1, Myriam Barrejón1,2, Jesús Cerdá3, Juan Aragó3, Sairaman Seetharaman4, Pilar de la Cruz1, Enrique Ortí3, Francis D'Souza4, Fernando Langa1. 1. Instituto de Nanociencia, Nanotecnología y Materiales Moleculares (INAMOL), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Campus de la Fábrica de Armas, 45071 Toledo, Spain. 2. Neural Repair and Biomaterials Laboratory, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (SESCAM), Finca la Peraleda s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain. 3. Instituto de Ciencia Molecular, Universidad de Valencia, 46950 Paterna, Spain. 4. Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle 305070, Denton, Texas 76203-5017, United States.
Abstract
Functional materials composed of spontaneously self-assembled electron donor and acceptor entities capable of generating long-lived charge-separated states upon photoillumination are in great demand as they are key in building the next generation of light energy harvesting devices. However, creating such well-defined architectures is challenging due to the intricate molecular design, multistep synthesis, and issues associated in demonstrating long-lived electron transfer. In this study, we have accomplished these tasks and report the synthesis of a new fullerene-bis-Zn-porphyrin e-bisadduct by tether-directed functionalization of C60 via a multistep synthetic protocol. Supramolecular oligomers were subsequently formed involving the two porphyrin-bearing arms embracing a fullerene cage of the vicinal molecule as confirmed by MALDI-TOF spectrometry and variable temperature NMR. In addition, the initially formed worm-like oligomers are shown to evolve to generate donut-like aggregates by AFM monitoring that was also supported by theoretical calculations. The final supramolecular donuts revealed an inner cavity size estimated as 23 nm, close to that observed in photosynthetic antenna systems. Upon systematic spectral, computational, and electrochemical studies, an energy level diagram was established to visualize the thermodynamic feasibility of electron transfer in these donor-acceptor constructs. Subsequently, transient pump-probe spectral studies covering the wide femtosecond-to-millisecond time scale were performed to confirm the formation of long-lived charge-separated states. The lifetime of the final charge-separated state was about 40 μs, thus highlighting the significance of the current approach of building giant self-organized donor-acceptor assemblies for light energy harvesting applications.
Functional materials composed of spontaneously self-assembled electron donor and acceptor entities capable of generating long-lived charge-separated states upon photoillumination are in great demand as they are key in building the next generation of light energy harvesting devices. However, creating such well-defined architectures is challenging due to the intricate molecular design, multistep synthesis, and issues associated in demonstrating long-lived electron transfer. In this study, we have accomplished these tasks and report the synthesis of a new fullerene-bis-Zn-porphyrin e-bisadduct by tether-directed functionalization of C60 via a multistep synthetic protocol. Supramolecular oligomers were subsequently formed involving the two porphyrin-bearing arms embracing a fullerene cage of the vicinal molecule as confirmed by MALDI-TOF spectrometry and variable temperature NMR. In addition, the initially formed worm-like oligomers are shown to evolve to generate donut-like aggregates by AFM monitoring that was also supported by theoretical calculations. The final supramolecular donuts revealed an inner cavity size estimated as 23 nm, close to that observed in photosynthetic antenna systems. Upon systematic spectral, computational, and electrochemical studies, an energy level diagram was established to visualize the thermodynamic feasibility of electron transfer in these donor-acceptor constructs. Subsequently, transient pump-probe spectral studies covering the wide femtosecond-to-millisecond time scale were performed to confirm the formation of long-lived charge-separated states. The lifetime of the final charge-separated state was about 40 μs, thus highlighting the significance of the current approach of building giant self-organized donor-acceptor assemblies for light energy harvesting applications.
Formation of self-assembled
supramolecular systems involves spontaneous
organization of one or more individual molecular components into an
ordered architecture[1−3] and has been Nature’s way of building molecular
machinery to perform complex tasks necessary to sustain life on Earth.[4−7] From a practical standpoint, supramolecular self-assembly offers
an elegant solution to explore the limits placed between the top-down
miniaturization approach and the bottom-up covalent building of large
structures. The use of relatively smaller subunits (building blocks)
in the construction of self-assembled supramolecular aggregates is
the main advantage, as the synthesis of building blocks could be handled
relatively easily and tuned to seek the desired physicochemical properties.[1−3]Apart from the synthetic aspects of designing molecules that
self-assemble
spontaneously into ordered structures, the issue of achieving a functional
response from the supramolecular architectures, either entirely new
ones or a response better than that of the individual constituents,
is of great interest to build the next generation of functional materials
and devices. Consequently, research into the ordered assembly of functional
molecules is very active, with potential applications in photonic
and electronic devices, for example, light energy harvesting, light-emitting
diodes, light modulators, sensors, and field effect transistors, to
name a few.[8−20] To provoke a collective response in self-assembled systems, the
idea of molecular communication has been introduced to quantify electronic
and/or geometric interactions between the molecular subunits. Individual
organic molecules exhibit relatively sharp electronic transitions
due to localized electron density distribution with minimal intermolecular
electronic overlap integrals. Disadvantageously, this results in the
reduction of charge carrier mobility, exciton delocalization, and
electron/hole mobility. To circumvent this issue, intermolecular interactions
can be used to direct how molecules self-assemble and interact to
enhance electronic interactions.[20]The great advantage of self-assembled supramolecular structures
is the possible integration of functionalities using noncovalent interactions.[20] This is particularly important for systems designed
for light energy harvesting, where a combination of donor and acceptor
molecules with at least one of them being photoactive, held in defined
geometry and orientation, is essential.[8−24] Over the years our teams have successfully demonstrated a range
of novel self-assembled donor–acceptor systems and have confirmed
the occurrence of photoinduced energy and electron transfer events
leading to charge-separated states of appreciable lifetimes.[21−24] In the majority of the reported studies, porphyrins, phthalocyanines,
corroles, BF2-chelated dipyrromethene (BODIPY), and its
azaBODIPY analogue formed the primarily photosensitizer/electron donor,
while nanocarbons, viz. fullerenes (C60 and C70), endohedral fullerenes (Sc3N@C60 and Li+@C60), diameter-sorted single-wall carbon nanotubes
(SWCNT(6,5) and SWCNT(7,6)), and exfoliated few-layer graphenes were
used as electron acceptors. These studies improved our fundamental
understanding of the self-assembly processes while enriching the supramolecular
chemistry of carbon nanomaterial–photosensitizer derived donor–acceptor
hybrids. Importantly, the kinetics of photoinduced events as a function
of molecular structure and topology and the nature of the self-assembly
protocol used were derived.[21−24]In this study, we hypothesize that by introducing
electronic communication
among the entities of self-assembled donor–acceptor supramolecular
architectures, (D–A) (D–A
are repeating units), we can improve migration of electron and/or
hole located on the initially formed D•+–A•– radical ion pair upon photoexcitation. This
process would distantly separate the radical cations and radical anions
along the supramolecular structure and subsequently slow the charge
recombination process. As a consequence, the much-desired long-lived
charge-separated states useful for designing a new generation of photocatalysts,
especially for solar fuel production, could be produced efficiently.
With this in mind, we have newly synthesized, by tether-directed functionalization,
a [60]fullerene e-bisadduct (1) carrying
two Zn porphyrins (Chart ) and demonstrate supramolecular organization and photophysical
events. Remarkably, the supramolecular assembly of the present bisporphyrin–C60 forms donut-shaped aggregates, primarily via π–π
type charge transfer interactions, as demonstrated by means of optical
absorption and emission, variable temperature 1H NMR, and
AFM and supported by theoretical calculations. More importantly, upon
photoexcitation, the supramolecular assembly generates long-lived
charge-separated states of ∼1–40 μs lifetime due
to electron/hole delocalization within the supramolecular structure.
As a control system, monoadduct 2 was prepared and studied,
showing significant differences in morphological and photophysical
behavior with respect to 1. In this case, neither donut-shaped
aggregates nor long-lived charge-separated aggregates could be observed.
Both facts demonstrate the need of both porphyrins for the supramolecular
organization. The unprecedented results of this study demonstrate
the success of supramolecular organization of donor–acceptor
pairs in biomimetic light energy harvesting.
Chart 1
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
and Characterization
The synthetic route
to bisadduct 1 is sketched in Scheme . Hydrazone 3 was prepared in
91% yield from p-nitrophenylhydrazine and 3-hydroxymethylbenzaldehide.[25] The reaction of 3 with di-tert-butylsilylbis(trifluoromethanesulfonate)
afforded 4 in 50% yield. Bisadduct 5 was
prepared by the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of a bisnitrilimine, resulting
from 4 and N-bromosuccinimide
(NBS) in the presence of triethylamine and C60 by using
the procedure previously described.[26] Purification
of the crude by column chromatography (silica gel, CS2:toluene
from 1:1 to 0:1) afforded in 35% yield a mixture of isomers of 5 as determined by 1H NMR and HPLC (Figure S1), where two peaks with the ratio 2.2:1
were observed. Preparative HPLC allowed the separation of the two
fractions. The major one (retention time = 9.2 min) corresponds to
a single isomer (named 5a) as inferred from the analysis
of the 1H NMR signals associated with the p-nitrophenyl moieties (Figure S9). In
contrast, the second fraction (retention time = 10.8 min) reveals,
by 1H NMR (Figure S10), to be
a mixture of two isomers (named 5b and 5c) in an approximately 3:1 ratio. The 1H NMR of 5a (Figure S9) showed two inequivalent AA′XX′
systems for the p-nitrophenyl groups appearing between
8.0 and 8.4 ppm as four doublets; the aromatic protons of the spacer
appear between 7.9 and 7.3 ppm, and the benzylic protons appear each
one as a doublet with a geminal J = 13.4 Hz. The
fact that the hydrogens of both p-nitrophenyl groups
show different shifts evidences the lack of symmetry of the molecule.
Scheme 1
Synthetic Route to the Preparation of 1
Reagents and conditions: (a) p-nitrophenylhydrazine, acetic acid, EtOH, reflux, 10 min;
(b) di-tert-butylsilylbis(trifluoromethanesulfonate),
pyridine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 12 h; (c)
(i) NBS, CHCl3, 30 min, (ii) C60, (Et)3N, toluene, 12 h, 40 °C; (d) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2:CH3CN 2:1, rt, 36 h; (e)
EDC, DMAP, ZnP-COOH (7), CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt.
Synthetic Route to the Preparation of 1
Reagents and conditions: (a) p-nitrophenylhydrazine, acetic acid, EtOH, reflux, 10 min;
(b) di-tert-butylsilylbis(trifluoromethanesulfonate),
pyridine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 12 h; (c)
(i) NBS, CHCl3, 30 min, (ii) C60, (Et)3N, toluene, 12 h, 40 °C; (d) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2:CH3CN 2:1, rt, 36 h; (e)
EDC, DMAP, ZnP-COOH (7), CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt.With the aim of obtaining
additional information about the stability
of the different regioisomers of 5, theoretical calculations
were performed by using the density functional density (DFT) B3LYP/6-31G
method. As summarized in Table S1, the
out e-isomer[27] is the
most stable followed by the out–out trans-3
(5.72 kcal mol–1) and out–out trans-4 (6.55 kcal mol–1) isomers (Figure ). Only the out e-isomer shows no molecular symmetry, which is consistent
with the 1H NMR spectrum of the major isomer 5a (vide supra), having two different p-nitrophenyl groups. Thus, 5a is assigned to the out e-isomer structure. Tentatively, the minor isomers 5b and 5c, found in the second fraction, are
associated with the out–out trans-3 and out–out trans-4 (see all
the possible bisadduct isomers in Figure S33).
Figure 1
Calculated structures of the most stable regioisomers of compound 5.
Calculated structures of the most stable regioisomers of compound 5.Rupture of the silyl ester group
in out e-5 with BF3·OEt2 yields after purification
by column chromatography dialcohol out e-6, which was unambiguously characterized (see Figures S13–S17). The 1H NMR signal assignment
of out e-6 clearly indicates the presence
of a single isomer (Figure S14). Interestingly,
when the reaction is done with the mixture of isomers of 5 (vide supra), after purification of the crude by
preparative thin layer chromatography, out e-6 could be isolated as a pure isomer in 20% yield. This procedure
allowed us to work with a higher amount of product.Next, the
pure out e-6 isomer was
reacted with ZnP-COOH (7)[28] by using 1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride
(EDC) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) as activators (step
“e” in Scheme ), affording, after purification by column chromatography
(SiO2, toluene) followed by gel permeation chromatography
(Biobeads SX1, dichloromethane), 1 as a purple solid
in 30% yield. The purity of 1 was checked by HPLC, and
its structure was confirmed by several spectroscopic techniques such
as 1H and 13C NMR, FT-IR, and MALDI-TOF mass
spectrometry (see Figures S18–S22). Interestingly, in the 1H NMR spectrum of 1 (at 298 K) the two α-methylene groups, with respect to the
ester moiety, appear as four doublets at 5.24, 5.15, 4.95, and 4.82
ppm, indicating that the four H atoms of both methylene groups have
different environments (Figure S18). For
the sake of comparison, monoadduct 2 (Chart ) was prepared by a similar
route (see the Supporting Information for
further details). It is noteworthy that the above-mentioned methylene
group in monoadduct 2 appears as a singlet in the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure S28).Soft ionization mass spectrometric methods such as MALDI-TOF allow
the analysis of the molar mass for large aggregates and polymers.[29] Using this technique, we found the molecular
ion peak of 1, in MALDI-TOF MS (matrix: DCTB), at m/z = 3340.2 with well-resolved isotopic
distribution. Interestingly, aggregates of up to 13 units of 1 were observed in the MALDI-TOF experiments (Figure S23), suggesting the formation of supramolecular
oligomers.The intermolecular aggregation of 1 was
further investigated
by 1H NMR (1.5 mM CDCl3, 400 MHz) in the range
from 313 to 223 K (Figure ). In the spectra, significant changes are observed for all
the signals upon decreasing the temperature, pointing out to the existence
of high molecular weight aggregates in solution. The signal at 9.00
ppm at room temperature, attributed to the β-pyrrolic hydrogens
in 12, 13, 17, and 18 positions of the porphyrins (those away from
the linker to the fullerene), suffers a small deshielding (Δδ
= −0.02 ppm) as temperature decreases. In contrast, those at
8.94 and 8.78 ppm, attributed to hydrogens in 2, 3, 7, and 8 positions,
closer to the ester group, are shielded up by 0.22 ppm at 223 K. The
characteristic aromatic signals of the 3,4-di-tert-butylphenyl groups appear at 8.08 and 7.86 ppm, the latter being
assigned to the six H atoms in para positions and
are differently affected by the temperature decrease with upfield
shifts of 0.1–0.2 ppm. The signals associated with the methylene
hydrogens between 4.5 and 5.5 ppm are shifted upfield up to 1.26 ppm,
being the most significant change in the spectra upon cooling. Furthermore,
a noticeable change is observed for the aliphatic signals corresponding
to the tert-butyl hydrogens, which initially appear
as a broad signal at 1.52 ppm, and some of them shield up upon temperature
decrease (Figure S19). This indicates that
the formation of the supramolecular aggregates does not affect equally
to all the tert-butyl groups of 1 as
theoretical calculations suggest (vide infra, see Figure ).
Figure 2
Parts of the 1H NMR spectra recorded for 1 at different temperatures
(1.5 mM CDCl3, 400 MHz) (∗
denotes residual dichloromethane).
Figure 5
(a) GFN-FF-optimized structure of the central
trimer of the linear
(left) and curved (right) decamer aggregate of bisadduct 1. (b) Zoomed-in view of the interaction center (square in (a)) for
linear (left) and curved (right) aggregates. C60 fragment
in green, C60 substituents in red, porphyrin ring in blue,
and porphyrin di-tert-butylphenyl meso substituents
in magenta.
Parts of the 1H NMR spectra recorded for 1 at different temperatures
(1.5 mM CDCl3, 400 MHz) (∗
denotes residual dichloromethane).To gain more insight into these spectral changes, a variable temperature 1H NMR study was also performed for monoadduct 2, which only bears one porphyrin “arm” and where the
formation of the supramolecular complex is not detected. As mentioned
above, compared to 1, the most significant difference
is observed for the methylene H atoms which appear as a singlet (Figure S32), in contrast to the two doublet signals
recorded for 1 (Figure ). Moreover, the temperature-dependent NMR studies
revealed that the singlet of the methylene group in 2 shields up by only 0.18 ppm when the spectra are registered at 223
K. The shift recorded for the rest of the H atoms differ by less than
±0.01 ppm (Figure S32).
AFM Study of
Intermolecular Aggregates
Atomic force
microscopy (AFM) was expected to provide additional information about
the supramolecular organization of the assemblies resulting from the
aggregation of fullerene–bisporphyrin bisadduct 1. AFM can be used to image the molecular structure of the assemblies
in solution even though the drying process can inevitably cause some
changes.[30] To this end, dilute solutions
of 1 in CH3Cl were spin-coated onto mica surfaces,
and AFM studies were accomplished in tapping mode. The studies revealed
the presence of spherical-shaped structures with a hollow core (donut-like
structures) of different sizes (Figure ), suggesting the formation of oligomers with variable
length. The line profiles along the red dotted lines shown in Figures a and 3c revealed the presence of structures with an average height
of 5.4 ± 0.7 nm, based on the statistical analysis of 35 donut-like
structures (see the histogram Figure e). If we suppose that the aggregated structures are
lying flatwise on the mica surfaces, the observed height may correspond
to the distance existing between both porphyrins. However, because
of the aggregation effect that may occur during the deposition process,
the observed height could also be the result of overlapped bisadduct
aggregates. If we consider the MALDI-TOF results that suggest the
formation of aggregates consisting of up to 13 units of 1, the donut-like structures could be attributed to aggregates that
result from the roll-up of initial fiber-like structures formed in
solution. To prove this, a 24 h AFM study was conducted where the
time evolution of the aggregation process was assessed. Thus, a solution
of 1 in CH3Cl was prepared and spin-coated
immediately onto mica surfaces. As observed in Figure f and Figure S34a, the presence of fiber-like aggregates, consisting probably of assemblies
of several bisadduct units, is dominant in freshly prepared solutions.
The same solution was again spin-coated onto mica surfaces after 2
h; at this stage, the fiber-type structures started to show some curvature,
and the donut-like aggregates seemed to be more evident by AFM (Figure S34b). A final study after 24 h revealed
the presence of the above-described donut-like structures (Figure S34c), confirming the evolution of the
first-formed fiber-like structures to the final donut-like aggregates,
probably through head-to-tail interactions.
Figure 3
(a) AFM topographic images
of the donut-shaped structures formed
by 1 along with the representative height profile in
red corresponding to the red dotted line. (b) 3D height image of (a).
(c) Enlarged image of one donut-shaped structure along with its corresponding
height profile in red. (d) 3D height image of (c). (e) Height distribution
histogram resulting from the study of 35 donut-like different structures.
(f) AFM topographic image showing fiber-type structures from a freshly
prepared solution of 1.
(a) AFM topographic images
of the donut-shaped structures formed
by 1 along with the representative height profile in
red corresponding to the red dotted line. (b) 3D height image of (a).
(c) Enlarged image of one donut-shaped structure along with its corresponding
height profile in red. (d) 3D height image of (c). (e) Height distribution
histogram resulting from the study of 35 donut-like different structures.
(f) AFM topographic image showing fiber-type structures from a freshly
prepared solution of 1.In an attempt to confirm the necessity of two porphyrins in the
formation of donut-like aggregates, AFM images were also taken for
monoadduct 2 (Figure S35).
As observed, under identical conditions, the AFM images revealed that
the monoadduct is randomly arranged with heights that vary from 8
to 12 nm. These results confirmed that the aggregation into donuts
is only possible when two porphyrin units are present.
Computational
Study of Intermolecular Aggregates
To
get a deeper insight into the structure of the aggregates formed by
bisadduct 1, the self-assembly of this system was theoretically
investigated at the molecular mechanics (MM) level by using the generic
GFN-FF force field recently developed by Spicher and Grimme.[31] GFN-FF is claimed to outperform other force
fields in terms of generality and accuracy, approaching the performance
of much more elaborate quantum-mechanical methods. Supramolecular
(1) oligomers (n = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18) with linear and curved
structures were modeled at the GFN-FF level as tentative structures
to the fibers and donuts experimentally observed. Figure displays the fully optimized
structures for both types of aggregates of the supramolecular decamer
(n = 10) as a representative example (Figure S36 shows the optimized structures of
shorter and longer oligomers). Curved structures are computed to be
more stable than linear structures by 2.6 kcal mol–1 per monomeric unit. This energy difference remains constant from
the hexamer and indicate that linear (fiber) and curved (donut) structures
may be competitive. In both structures, bisadduct 1 exhibits
a conformation with both porphyrin-bearing arms extended and wrapping
the fullerene cage of a vicinal molecule. In linear aggregates, monomers
are separated by 21.50 Å, which corresponds to the distance between
the center of mass of adjacent fullerenes. In curved aggregates, fullerenes
are separated by a slightly shorter distance of 21.12 Å and form
angles of ∼171°. This angle defines the curvature of the
aggregate and by adding more monomers would form a round donut-type
structure with an estimated diameter of 23 nm. This value is smaller
than that observed from AFM experiments, but it should be stressed
that the theoretical structure is calculated in gas phase for ideal
1D chains without taking into account more complex agglomerated structures
or the interactions with the surface. Calculations performed for the
supramolecular (1)9 oligomer, as an intermediate
oligomer, at the more accurate semiempirical GFN2-xTB level[32] confirm the curved aggregate to be slightly
more stable than the linear aggregate (see the Supporting Information and Figure S37 for more details). The small energy difference between linear and
curved structures supports the evolution from fiber-type aggregates
initially observed by AFM upon deposition from freshly prepared solutions
to the donut-type aggregates evidenced after 24 h deposition from
solution (Figure S34).
Figure 4
GFN-FF-optimized structures
calculated for a linear (a) and curved
(b) decamer aggregate of bisadduct 1.
GFN-FF-optimized structures
calculated for a linear (a) and curved
(b) decamer aggregate of bisadduct 1.To perform a more detailed analysis of the noncovalent interactions
taking place in the (1) aggregates, Figure a shows the central trimers extracted from the fully optimized linear
and curved decamers of Figure . Figure b
displays a magnified view of the interaction center between two vicinal
monomers in the aggregate, in which molecular fragments are drawn
in different colors to make easy the identification of the interactions.
The two benzyl benzoate moieties of the monomer extend in the same
direction interacting between them through stabilizing C–H···π
and C–H···O contacts. These interactions mainly
involve the CH2 groups, which exhibit different chemical
environments as suggested by 1H NMR experiments and facilitate
the wrapping of a vicinal fullerene unit by the two porphyrins. The
porphyrin moieties act as “hands” that catch the fullerene
ball (in green) through π··· π interactions
with the porphyrin fragment (in blue) and also C–H···π
interactions with the tert-butyl pendant groups (in
magenta). For both linear and curved aggregates, the Zn atoms are
centered over C60 5–6 bonds with short Zn–C
distances in the 2.49–2.56 Å range. The nearest distance
between tert-butyl hydrogens and C60 carbons
is 2.55 Å. The distance between the two Zn atoms is on average
9.67 Å for the linear aggregate and slightly shorter (9.44 Å)
for the curved aggregate. The distance between the most external tert-butyl hydrogens is of 24.23 Å for the linear disposition
and increases to 25.76 Å for the curved one. These values are
a half of the height measured by AFM for the structures deposited
on mica, suggesting that more agglomerated structures can be formed.
There is an important difference between the two porphyrin moieties.
For that placed on the top of the fullerene cage in Figure b, the three di-tert-butylphenyl meso substituents are interacting with the ball. In
contrast, the three di-tert-butylphenyl groups of
the bottom porphyrin are interacting both with the π-surface
of C60 and the C60 substituents. In particular,
short C–H···O contacts between tert-butyl hydrogen atoms and nitro groups are visualized. These contacts
are significantly shorter for curved aggregates (2.13–2.28
Å) than for linear aggregates (2.14–2.46 Å) and contribute
to stabilize the former.(a) GFN-FF-optimized structure of the central
trimer of the linear
(left) and curved (right) decamer aggregate of bisadduct 1. (b) Zoomed-in view of the interaction center (square in (a)) for
linear (left) and curved (right) aggregates. C60 fragment
in green, C60 substituents in red, porphyrin ring in blue,
and porphyrin di-tert-butylphenyl meso substituents
in magenta.
Spectral and Electrochemical
Studies
Figure a shows the absorption spectrum
(normalized to the Soret porphyrin band) of compounds 1, 2, and 7, along with that of the doubly
functionalized compound 6 (Scheme ), in benzonitrile. For 1, the
Soret band at 432 nm and the visible Q bands at 562 and 602 nm are
slightly red-shifted by 1–2 nm compared to 7 and
monoadduct 2. Decreasing by half or increasing by a factor
of 2 the concentration of 1 had virtually no spectral
broadening or shift effect. This suggests that the supramolecular
association described above is not perturbing the electronic structure
of ZnP considerably. The fluorescence spectra shown in Figure b reveal two emission peaks
of ZnP at 612 and 662 nm. As expected, substantial quenching is observed
for both compound 1 (68%) and 2 (84%). In
a control experiment, the fluorescence spectrum of compound 6 was also recorded, and a broad emission with a peak maximum
at 704 nm was observed. Excitation of ZnP at either the Soret or visible
bands of compounds 1 and 2 revealed no traces
of emission of 6, indicating that energy transfer from
ZnP to C60 is not a likely mechanism of fluorescence quenching.
It is also to be pointed out that at the Soret excitation of ZnP at
432 nm about 6% of absorbance is due to C60. It is likely
that any weak emission of C60 is buried under the strong
emission peaks of ZnP in the spectral range.
Figure 6
(a) Absorption (normalized
to the Soret band) and (b) fluorescence
spectra of the indicated compounds in benzonitrile. The compounds
were excited at 432 nm corresponding to the Soret band. The inset
in (a) shows the expanded visible spectral region. The fluorescence
of control fullerene 6 is also shown in (b) for comparison
(λex = 330 nm, not drawn to concentration scale).
(a) Absorption (normalized
to the Soret band) and (b) fluorescence
spectra of the indicated compounds in benzonitrile. The compounds
were excited at 432 nm corresponding to the Soret band. The inset
in (a) shows the expanded visible spectral region. The fluorescence
of control fullerene 6 is also shown in (b) for comparison
(λex = 330 nm, not drawn to concentration scale).To probe the effect of the different number of
pyrazolino rings
and nitrophenyl substituents on the reduction potentials of C60, cyclic voltammetry (CV) and Osteryoung square-wave voltammetry
(OSWV) studies were performed, as any change in the reduction potentials
would perturb the energetics of the envisioned photodriven electron-transfer
reactions. Figure a shows representative CVs of compounds 1 and C60 in o-dichlorobenzene:acetonitrile
(4:1 v/v), and the measured redox potentials are summarized in Table S4 along with additional CVs and OSWVs.
Both compounds 1 and 2 exhibit two reduction
and two oxidation processes within the accessible potential window,
displaying slightly better electron affinities (E1red = −1.01 V for 1 and
−1.00 V for 2) than pristine C60 (−1.03
V) as described for other pyrazolinofullerene derivatives.[26] In the anodic side of the voltammograms, the
first oxidation process is associated with the porphyrin moieties
and appears at +0.29 and +0.30 V for 1 and 2, respectively. It may be mentioned here that for fulleropyrrolidine
derivatives synthesized according to Prato’s method reduction
potentials of C60 depend on the degree of functionalization.[33] In general, reduction of C60 becomes
harder by about 100 mV upon addition of one pyrrolidine ring on C60 due to conversion of two sp2 carbons to sp3 carbons. This trend is confirmed when saturating more sp2–sp2 carbon–carbon bonds, and for
example, C60 becomes harder to reduce by about 200 mV upon
addition of two pyrrolidine rings having different regioisomers.[33b] In contrast, the bis- and monopyrazole functionalization
in compounds 1 and 2 have made the C60 cage a slightly better electron acceptor. That is, the electron-acceptor
ability of C60 is not compromised by the present synthetic
strategy.
Figure 7
(a) Cyclic voltammograms of 1 (i) and C60 (ii) in o-dichlorobenzene:acetonitrile (4:1
v/v) containing 0.1 M (Bu4N)ClO4; scan rate
= 100 mV s–1. (b) Isovalue contour plots (±0.03
au) calculated at the B3LYP-6-31G** level for the HOMO and LUMO of
monoadduct 2.
(a) Cyclic voltammograms of 1 (i) and C60 (ii) in o-dichlorobenzene:acetonitrile (4:1
v/v) containing 0.1 M (Bu4N)ClO4; scan rate
= 100 mV s–1. (b) Isovalue contour plots (±0.03
au) calculated at the B3LYP-6-31G** level for the HOMO and LUMO of
monoadduct 2.The electronic properties of compounds 1 and 2 were also theoretically investigated at the density functional
theory (DFT) B3LYP/6-31G** level.[34] The
minimum-energy molecular structures calculated for 1 and 2 are drawn in Figure S38. As depicted
in Figure b for monoadduct 2, the HOMO is fully localized over the porphyrin moiety whereas
the LUMO resides over the C60 fragment. Analogous HOMO
and LUMO topologies are obtained for bisadduct 1 (Figure S39). The energy of the LUMO, calculated
by using o-dichlorobenzene as solvent, was found
to decrease in passing from pristine C60 (−3.10
eV), to monoadduct 2 (−3.22 eV), and to bisadduct 1 (−3.26 eV). This trend agrees with the gain in the
electron-acceptor ability inferred from electrochemical data as pyrazoline
units are attached to the C60 ball. The electron affinity,
computed as the energy difference between the neutral molecule and
the anion at the equilibrium geometry of the neutral system, actually
increases in passing from C60 (3.08 eV), to monoadduct 2 (3.21 eV), to bisadduct 1 (3.25 eV). Figure S40 presents the spin densities calculated
for the cation and anion radical species of 1 and 2 and shows that upon oxidation the electron is extracted
from the porphyrin moiety, whereas the extra electron introduced upon
reduction is fully injected in C60.Figure a shows
the lowest-energy excited states computed for the different molecular
fragments of compounds 1 and 2 by using
the time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) B3LYP/6-31G** approach and benzonitrile
as solvent. The lowest S1 and S2 singlet states
of 7 are computed almost degenerate at 2.26 eV (549 nm),
in good agreement with the Q-band observed at 2.21 eV (562 nm) and
have low intensities with small oscillator strengths (f) of 0.079 and 0.041, respectively. The following two singlet states,
S3 and S4, are calculated close in energy at
2.99 eV (414) and 3.01 eV (411 nm), respectively, with high intensity
(f = 1.475 and 1.612, respectively), and give rise
to the Soret band experimentally observed at 2.87 eV (432 nm). The
lowest triplet states of 7 are calculated at 1.61 and
1.64 eV (T1 and T2) and 2.01 and 2.04 eV (T3 and T4). In contrast to porphyrin, which presents
a few low-energy excited states, the C60 derivative 6 has a manifold of states, the lowest two singlets being
found at 1.99 and 2.04 eV and the lowest triplets at 1.55 and 1.73
eV. For monoadduct 2, the lowest-lying singlet excited
states correspond to intramolecular ZnP·+–C60·– charge-transfer states in which
one electron is transferred from the porphyrin moiety to the C60 unit. These states are calculated in the 1.75–2.10
eV range, have zero oscillator strengths, and imply excitations from
the HOMO and HOMO–1 located on the ZnP environment to the LUMO,
LUMO+1, and LUMO+2 spreading over the C60 cage (Table S2). For instance, in the S1 state resulting from the HOMO → LUMO excitation, a total
charge of 0.99e is transferred from the ZnP environment
to the C60 unit. The states associated with the Q and Soret
bands of ZnP are computed at 2.28 and 3.02 eV, respectively, close
to the energies found for 7. A practically identical
distribution of localized and charge-transfer states is computed for
bisadduct 1, the main difference being the doubling of
the states concerning the ZnP moiety. To estimate the energy position
of the intermolecular ZnP·+···C60·– charge-transfer states that are
expected to appear for the aggregate of bisadduct 1,
we have used a supramolecular 7···6 dimer extracted from the (1)10 aggregate
and reoptimized at the B3LYP/6-31G** level including the D3 dispersion
term.[35] TDDFT calculations predict intermolecular
ZnP·+···C60·– states in the 1.57–1.88 eV range with small oscillator strengths
(f = 0.001–0.006) (Table S3), which are located significantly lower in energy than the
intramolecular ZnP·+–C60·– states (Figure a).
The stabilization of the intermolecular ZnP·+···C60·– states results from the fact that
the donor ZnP moieties and the acceptor C60 unit are placed
at significantly shorter distances in the aggregate. For instance,
the distance between the Zn atom and the nearest carbon atom of the
C60 unit is of 5.75 Å in 1 and decreases
to only 2.78 Å for the aggregate due to the intermolecular interactions.
Figure 8
(a) Energy
level diagram showing the vertical excitation energies
calculated for the singlets (solid lines) and triplets (dashed lines)
of ZnP–COOH (7) and 6 and for the
singlets of monoadduct 2 and the 7···6 supramolecular dimer present in aggregates of bisadduct 1. Excited states localized on the ZnP environment are colored in
green, those on C60 in blue, and ZnP·+–C60·– charge-transfer states in red.
(b) Energy level diagram showing different photochemical events upon
photoexcitation of ZnP in compounds 1 and 2. Thick arrow: most likely process; thin and dashed arrow: less likely
process (EnT = energy transfer, CS = charge separation, CR = charge
recombination, ISC = intersystem crossing, T = triplet emission, and
F = fluorescence emission).
(a) Energy
level diagram showing the vertical excitation energies
calculated for the singlets (solid lines) and triplets (dashed lines)
of ZnP–COOH (7) and 6 and for the
singlets of monoadduct 2 and the 7···6 supramolecular dimer present in aggregates of bisadduct 1. Excited states localized on the ZnP environment are colored in
green, those on C60 in blue, and ZnP·+–C60·– charge-transfer states in red.
(b) Energy level diagram showing different photochemical events upon
photoexcitation of ZnP in compounds 1 and 2. Thick arrow: most likely process; thin and dashed arrow: less likely
process (EnT = energy transfer, CS = charge separation, CR = charge
recombination, ISC = intersystem crossing, T = triplet emission, and
F = fluorescence emission).An energy level diagram depicting different photochemical events
in 1 and 2 is shown in Figure b. The energy of the different
states was calculated from spectral, electrochemical, and computational
data, according to the Rehm–Weller approach.[36] It is clear from the figure that the 1ZnP* singlet
excited species formed upon photoexcitation can undergo deactivation
competitively by at least four thermodynamically allowed processes,
viz., fluorescence emission to produce the photosensitizer ground
state, intersystem crossing to populate the photosensitizer triplet
state 3ZnP*, singlet–singlet energy transfer to
produce the acceptor singlet excited state 1C60*, and electron-transfer reaction involving fullerene to produce
the ZnP•–C60•– charge-separated state. Because partial quenching
was observed in both 1 and 2 (Figure b), part of the ZnP follows
the path of fluorescence emission. Singlet–singlet energy transfer,
although thermodynamically possible, is less likely as the earlier
discussed steady-state fluorescence data did provide sufficient evidence
for the occurrence of this process. It appears that electron transfer
is likely the mechanism of majority of fluorescence quenching. Another
key point is that the experimentally calculated energy of the charge-separated
state is below that of 3ZnP* and 3C60*. Under such circumstances, the charge-separated state could charge-recombine
directly to the ground state. To secure direct experimental evidence
for these envisioned photoprocesses and associated rates, and to seek
whether the earlier-discussed aggregation would improve lifetime of
charge-separated states, femto- and nanosecond transient absorption
studies were performed in benzonitrile, and the results are summarized
below. Prior to this, to help interpret the transient–absorption
data, 7 was chemically oxidized by using nitrosonium
tetrafluoroborate (NOBF4), as shown in Figure S45. The oxidized product revealed new peaks at 615,
782, and 870 nm corresponding to the formation of the ZnP• radical cation. The radical anion of C60, C60•–, is known to have an
absorption band in the near-IR region of 1020 nm. The absorption spectra
of the ZnP–COOH• radical cation
and 6•– radical anion species
were also calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G** level after reoptimizing
the geometries of the neutral systems. For ZnP–COOH•+, absorptions are predicted at 1.48 eV (840 nm, f = 0.078), 1.66 eV (748 nm, f = 0.057), 1.88 eV
(659 nm, f = 0.015), and 1.99 eV (623 nm, f = 0.006), in rather good correlation with the experimental
findings. For 6•–, a low-intensity
absorption is predicted at 1.21 eV (1024 nm, f =
0.040), slightly shifted with respect to that calculated for the C60•– anion (1052 nm, f = 0.075) at the same theoretical level.
Femto- and Nanosecond Transient
Absorption Spectral Studies
Femtosecond transient absorption
spectra (fs-TA) of the control
compounds 7 and 6, along with 1 and 2, are shown in Figure S46, whereas a snapshot of the spectrum collected at 25 ps delay time
is shown in Figure a for comparison purposes. The instantaneously formed 1ZnP*–COOH revealed positive peaks at 458, 588, 641, and 1288
nm due to excited-state absorption (ESA), a negative peak at 564 due
to ground-state bleaching (GSB), and two negative peaks at 607 and
665 nm due to stimulated emission (SE) of 1ZnP* (see Figure S46a and Figure a(i)). The 607 nm peak also had contributions
from GSB. Decay of the positive peaks and recovery of the negative
peaks was slow in accordance with relatively long-lived 1ZnP* and was accomplished by two new signals at 480 and 848 nm due
to the formation of 3ZnP* via the process of intersystem
crossing. Confirmation for the formation of 3ZnP* came
from nanosecond transient absorption (ns-TA) spectral studies as shown
in Figure S47a. The 3ZnP* decayed
with a time constant of 15.4 μs. The fs-TA spectra of 6 are shown in Figure S46b and Figure a(iv). ESA peaks
at 528 nm and a broad peak covering the 800–1100 nm range were
observed. The decay of the ESA peaks of 1C60* was accompanied by a new peak at 690 nm due to the formation of 3C60*.[37] The fs-TA spectral
data of 7 and 6 were further analyzed by
developing decay-associated spectra (DAS). The DAS of 7 as shown in Figure b(i) revealed three components. The 3.3 and 834 ps spectra with peaks
at 890, 1112, 1205, and 1290 nm were mirror images representing formation
and decay of 1ZnP*. The third spectrum revealed a major
peak at 848 nm and a minor peak at 1290 nm. The 848 nm peak is consistent
with the earlier discussed 3ZnP*. The DAS analysis of 16* yielded a lifetime of 1.43 ns.
Figure 9
(a) The fs-TA spectrum
at the delay time of 25 ps of (i) 7, (ii) compound 1, and (iv) compound 6. Panel (iii) shows the
spectrum of chemically generated ZnP•+. All spectra
were recorded in deaerated benzonitrile.
Porphyrin-containing compounds were excited at 435 nm, whereas compound 6 was excited at 363 nm. (b) Decay-associated spectra in the
near-IR region for (i) 7 and (ii) compound 1.
(a) The fs-TA spectrum
at the delay time of 25 ps of (i) 7, (ii) compound 1, and (iv) compound 6. Panel (iii) shows the
spectrum of chemically generated ZnP•+. All spectra
were recorded in deaerated benzonitrile.
Porphyrin-containing compounds were excited at 435 nm, whereas compound 6 was excited at 363 nm. (b) Decay-associated spectra in the
near-IR region for (i) 7 and (ii) compound 1.The fs-TA spectra of compounds 1 and 2 are shown in Figures S46c and S46d, respectively
(also see Figure a(ii)
for the spectrum of 1 at 25 ps). Peaks associated with
the 1ZnP*’s ESA, GSB, and SE revealed faster decay/recovery
with new transient peaks at 634, 855, and 1020 nm. The first two peaks
agree well with the ZnP• spectrum
(also see Figure a(iii)
for the overlaid spectrum of ZnP•),
whereas the 1020 nm is consistent with the formation of C60•–, thus providing evidence for photoinduced
electron transfer. As expected, the decay of 1ZnP* did
not populate 3ZnP*, indicating that intersystem crossing
is not the main deactivation path in 1 and 2. The DAS generated for 1 revealed three components
(Figure b(ii)). The
first one at 36 ps had features of 1ZnP*, discussed earlier
for 7. The short time constant for this species is consistent
with 1ZnP* undergoing faster deactivation due to the occurrence
of electron transfer. The second component at 683 ps reveals features
of both charge-separated state and 1ZnP* (note: compound 1 possesses two ZnP entities; only one ZnP entity is required
to promote electron transfer), whereas the third DAS with infinity
time constant (>3 ns) shows peaks at 856 and 1028 nm, expected
for
the ZnP•–C60•– charge-separated state in the near-IR region.
DAS generated for compound 2 revealed three components
(see Figure S46d inset). The first one
at a time constant of 225 ps has negative peaks at 880 and 1095 nm
(represent growth of new species) and positive peaks at 1185 and 1294
nm (represent decay), and the second DAS at 1.29 ns has peaks at 870
and 1030 nm. The third DAS with infinity time constant (>3 ns)
reveals
peaks expected for the ZnP•–C60•– charge-separated state. These
results establish successful occurrence of excited-state electron
transfer in 1 and 2. The DAS at 683 ps in
the case of 1 and 225 ps in the case of 2, attributed to time constants for charge separation, resulted in
a charge-separation rate constant (kCS) of 4.44 × 109 s–1 for 1 and 1.46 × 109 s–1 for 2.The final DAS of both compounds 1 and 2 indicate persistence of charge-separated states beyond the
monitoring
time window of our fs-TA setup being 3 ns. Earlier-discussed AFM studies
revealed large donut-shaped aggregate formation in the case of 1. To find out the final lifetime and to see whether the aggregates
could extend the lifetime of the charge-separated states, ns-TA spectral
studies were performed. As shown in Figure S47c, the ns-TA spectrum of 2 in benzonitrile was largely
featureless; that is, no peak supporting the existence of ZnP•–C60•– charge-separated state could be clearly seen. Indeed, weak features
of 3ZnP* in the near-IR region were observed, indicating
that the lifetime of the charge-separated state is <30 ns, the
earliest detectable time window of our instrumental setup. In contrast,
the ns-TA spectra of 1, as shown in Figure a, revealed transient features
of both radical cation and radical anion that lasted for few microseconds.
The lifetime of the final charge-separated state, obtained from monitoring
the decay of the 1020 nm peak (Figure b), was biexponential, with decay time constants
of about 1 μs (major, ∼80%) and 40 μs (minor, ∼20%),
indicating the formation of a long-lived charge-separated state in
compound 1. Increasing the concentration of 1 from the initial 1 mM to 2 or 3 mM, without compromising optical
transparency, only slightly affected the final lifetime of the charge-separated
states.
Figure 10
(a) Nanosecond transient absorption spectra of 1 at
the indicated delay times in deaerated benzonitrile (λex = 430 nm). (b) Time profile of the 1020 nm peak corresponding to
C60•–.
(a) Nanosecond transient absorption spectra of 1 at
the indicated delay times in deaerated benzonitrile (λex = 430 nm). (b) Time profile of the 1020 nm peak corresponding to
C60•–.
Conclusions
The unprecedented results summarized here have
successfully demonstrated
how lifetime of the charge-separated state could be extended by means
of organized molecular donor–acceptor assemblies built by using 1. Compound 2, having a single donor and a single
acceptor entity, revealed lack of aggregation formation signifying
the importance of the second ZnP in the formation of well-defined
donut-shaped assemblies. Charge stabilization via electron delocalization
in donor–acceptor assemblies having closely associated donors
or acceptors is a well-known phenomenon.[38] The present system differs, however, in that the organization pattern
is much better defined compared to previous systems. Energy-optimized
structures revealed intermolecular interactions between the donor
and acceptor entities with a curvature needed to build the donut–aggregates.
The primary forces directing such assembly were π···π
and C–H···π interactions, along with short
C–H···O contacts between tert-butyl hydrogen atoms and nitro groups, creating the curvature over
a period of time, prompting the formation of donut structures exhibiting
an impressive inner cavity size estimated as 23 nm, close to that
observed in natural photosynthetic antenna systems. The lifetime of
the final radical ion pair, on the order of 40 μs, is one of
the highest reported to date, highlighting the significance of giant
donor–acceptor structures for light energy harvesting applications.
The current strategy of building functional, photoactive structures
is expected to lead to the design of next generation of photocatalysts
for light-to-fuel and light-to-commodity chemicals production. Our
laboratories are currently looking into such applications.
Authors: Michael Hambourger; Gary F Moore; David M Kramer; Devens Gust; Ana L Moore; Thomas A Moore Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 54.564
Authors: Juan L Delgado; Pilar de la Cruz; Vicente López-Arza; Fernando Langa; David B Kimball; Michael M Haley; Yasuyuki Araki; Osamu Ito Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2004-04-16 Impact factor: 4.354