Literature DB >> 34258707

A comprehensive survey on non-invasive wearable bladder volume monitoring systems.

Morteza Zakeri Nasrabadi1, Hamideh Tabibi2, Mahsa Salmani3, Mahdieh Torkashvand2, Eisa Zarepour4.   

Abstract

Measuring the volume of urine in the bladder is a significant issue in patients who suffer from the lack of bladder fullness sensation or have problems with timeliness getting to the restroom, such as spinal cord injury patients and some of the elderlies. Real-time monitoring of the bladder, therefore, can be highly helpful for urinary incontinence. Bladder volume monitoring technologies can be divided into two distinct categories of invasive and non-invasive. In invasive techniques, a catheter is directly inserted into the urethra to measure the amount of urine accurately. However, it is painful, limits the user's ordinary movements, and may hurt the urinary tract. Current non-invasive techniques measure the volume of the bladder from the skin using different stationary or portable apparatus at health centers. Both techniques have difficulties and are not cost-effective to use for a long period. Recently, both invasive and non-invasive methods have been attempted to be produced in the form of wearable devices utilizing different sensing and communication technologies. Wearable bladder monitoring devices can be easily used by patients with no or few clinical steps, making them much more affordable than non-wearable devices. While wearable devices seem to be a highly convenient and effective solution, they suffer from few drawbacks, such as relatively low precision. Hence, a great number of studies have been conducted to address these issues. In this article, we review and discuss non-invasive and minimally invasive methods for monitoring the bladder volume. We focus on the most practical and state-of-the-art methods employed in wearable devices, classify them by engineering and medical characteristics, and investigate their specifications, architectures, and measurement algorithms. This study aims to introduce the latest advances in this field to practitioners while comparing the advantages and disadvantages of existing approaches. Our study concludes with open problems and future trends in the area of bladder monitoring and measurement systems. Graphical abstract Wearable bladder monitoring system.
© 2021. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder dysfunction; Bladder monitoring systems; Internet of things; Non-invasive monitoring; Wearable device

Year:  2021        PMID: 34258707     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02395-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  46 in total

1.  Accuracy of bladder volume determinations by ultrasonography: are they accurate over entire bladder volume range?

Authors:  Seok Soo Byun; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Eunsik Lee; Jae-Seung Paick; Weechang Kamg; Seung-June Oh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Benjamin Abelson; Steve Majerus; Daniel Sun; Bradley C Gill; Eboo Versi; Margot S Damaser
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Three dimensional Monte Carlo code for photon migration through complex heterogeneous media including the adult human head.

Authors:  David Boas; J Culver; J Stott; A Dunn
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2002-02-11       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  The use of in vivo, ex vivo, in vitro, computational models and volunteer studies in vision research and therapy, and their contribution to the Three Rs.

Authors:  Robert D Combes; Atul B Shah
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.303

5.  Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement.

Authors:  D T Delpy; M Cope; P van der Zee; S Arridge; S Wray; J Wyatt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Assessing bladder volumes in young children prior to instrumentation: accuracy of an automated ultrasound device compared to real-time ultrasound.

Authors:  Catherine Bevan; Davina Buntsma; Amanda Stock; Tania Griffiths; Susan Donath; Franz E Babl
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  The Virtual Family--development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations.

Authors:  Andreas Christ; Wolfgang Kainz; Eckhart G Hahn; Katharina Honegger; Marcel Zefferer; Esra Neufeld; Wolfgang Rascher; Rolf Janka; Werner Bautz; Ji Chen; Berthold Kiefer; Peter Schmitt; Hans-Peter Hollenbach; Jianxiang Shen; Michael Oberle; Dominik Szczerba; Anthony Kam; Joshua W Guag; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications.

Authors:  Moshaddique Al Ameen; Jingwei Liu; Kyungsup Kwak
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Non-invasive bladder volume measurement for the prevention of postoperative urinary retention: validation of two ultrasound devices in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Tammo A Brouwer; Charina van den Boogaard; Eric N van Roon; Cor J Kalkman; Nic Veeger
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Application of ultrasound in medicine.

Authors:  Aladin Carovac; Fahrudin Smajlovic; Dzelaludin Junuzovic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2011-09
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Assistive Electronic Device Solutions for Urology.

Authors:  Kieran Holmes-Martin; Minghui Zhu; Shujun Xiao; Faezeh Arab Hassani
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 2.  NIRS: Past, Present, and Future in Functional Urology.

Authors:  Alexander Koven; Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2022-08-11

3.  Spinal cord injury and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: what do we know and where are we going?

Authors:  William Dodd; Kartik Motwani; Coulter Small; Kevin Pierre; Devan Patel; Samuel Malnik; Brandon Lucke-Wold; Ken Porche
Journal:  J Mens Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 0.537

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.