| Literature DB >> 34258685 |
Laureano E Carpio1, Yolanda Sanz2, Rafael Gozalbes1, Stephen J Barigye3,4.
Abstract
Scientific and consumer interest in healthy foods (also known as functional foods), nutraceuticals and cosmeceuticals has increased in the recent years, leading to an increased presence of these products in the market. However, the regulations across different countries that define the type of claims that may be made, and the degree of evidence required to support these claims, are rather inconsistent. Moreover, there is also controversy on the effectiveness and biological mode of action of many of these products, which should undergo an exhaustive approval process to guarantee the consumer rights. Computational approaches constitute invaluable tools to facilitate the discovery of bioactive molecules and provide biological plausibility on the mode of action of these products. Indeed, methodologies like QSAR, docking or molecular dynamics have been used in drug discovery protocols for decades and can now aid in the discovery of bioactive food components. Thanks to these approaches, it is possible to search for new functions in food constituents, which may be part of our daily diet, and help to prevent disorders like diabetes, hypercholesterolemia or obesity. In the present manuscript, computational studies applied to this field are reviewed to illustrate the potential of these approaches to guide the first screening steps and the mechanistic studies of nutraceutical, cosmeceutical and functional foods.Entities:
Keywords: Cosmeceuticals; Docking; Health foods; Machine learning; Molecular dynamics; Nutraceuticals; QSAR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34258685 PMCID: PMC8277569 DOI: 10.1007/s11030-021-10277-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Divers ISSN: 1381-1991 Impact factor: 3.364
Fig. 1Number of patents of every term by year on Google Patents
Chemical databases for nutraceutical, cosmeceutical and functional food research
| Database | Description | Organization | Website access |
|---|---|---|---|
| PubChem [ | Open chemistry database with more than 100 million compounds. PubChem contains numerous small molecules but also larger molecules such as nucleotides, lipids, peptides and more | National Institutes of Health (NIH) | |
| Zinc [ | A free database of commercially available compounds with more than 230 million compounds | University of California | |
| ChEMBL [ | A manually curated database of bioactive molecules with drug-like properties with 2 million compounds and their abstracted bioactivities | European Bioinformatics Institute | |
| NCI [ | A database with more than 275.000 small molecules for research in the field of cancer/AIDS | National Cancer Institute | |
| ChemDB [ | Chemical database that contains about 5 million of small molecules and its physicochemical properties | Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics from the University of California | |
| ChemSpider [ | Free chemical structure database with over 67 million structures from hundreds of data sources | The Royal Society of Chemistry | |
| BindingDB [ | A database with information from about 1 million binding data for more than 6000 protein targets and near 400.000 small molecules | Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of California | |
| PDB-Bind [ | A collection of more than 21.000 entries of binding affinities for protein–ligand complexes | Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry | |
| PDBeChem [ | A database with more than 30.000 entries that contains small molecules, ligands and monomers searched in the Protein Data Bank | The European Bioinformatics Institute | |
| KEGG [ | A database that integrates genomic, chemical and systemic functional information | Kaneisha Laboratories | |
| HMDB [ | The Human Metabolome Database contains detailed information about small molecules found in the human body | The Metabolomics Innovation Centre | |
| SMPDB [ | The Small Molecule Pathway Database with about 50.000 entries with pathway information about the human body | The Metabolomics Innovation Centre and DrugBank | |
| BIAdb [ | Database of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids with more than 800 entries | Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology | |
| DrugBank [ | A database that combines chemical and pharmaceutical data with comprehensive drug target information. DrugBank contains more than 13.000 entries of which more than 130 are about nutraceutical molecules | Wishart Research Group | |
| SuperNatural [ | Freely available database of natural compounds with more than 300.000 entries | Charite University of Medicine | |
| NPACT [ | Curated database of plant derived natural compounds that exhibits anti-cancerous activity. Contains more than 1.500 entries | The Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology | |
| TTD [ | Therapeutic Target Database that provides information about the known therapeutic protein and nucleic acid targets and the corresponding drugs directed at each of these targets | Zhejiang University | |
| PharmGKB [ | A pharmacogenomics database that encompasses clinical information of drug molecules with more than 600 entries | PharmGKB | |
| SuperDrug [ | Database that contains about 2500 3D-structures of active compounds of marketed drugs | Charite University of Medicine |
Fig. 2QSAR general workflow
Main techniques for obtaining the 3D structure of macromolecules
| Experimental | Technique | Definition |
| X-Ray crystallography | One of the most used technique for structure determination of proteins and macromolecules. A purified sample at high concentration is crystallized and exposed to an x-ray beam. Those results can be processed allowing to obtain the 3D structure of the molecule [ | |
| Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy | Analytical chemistry technique that reveals the atomic structure of macromolecules in highly concentrated solutions based on the fact that certain atomic nuclei (such as H, 13C, 19F, 23Na, or 31P) are intrinsically magnetic [ | |
| Cryo-Electron Microscopy | Based on the imaging of frozen-hydrated molecules by electron microscopy. Allows obtaining molecular resolution but in recent studies atomic resolution has been achieved [ | |
| Computational | Homology modelling | Computational prediction method that allows to determine the protein 3D structure from its amino acid sequence based on 3D structure templates of proteins with similar sequences[ |
Fig. 3Example of a docking pose result of the binding of curcumin in yellow with acetylcholinesterase(PDB ID: 6U3P) in blue
Different molecular docking tools and their algorithms
| Molecular Docking tool | Algorithm | Website |
|---|---|---|
| AutoDock [ | Monte Carlo Simulated Annealing, Genetic Algorithm, and Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm | |
| Gold [ | Genetic Algorithm | |
| Glide [ | In-house algorithm using different search criteria and refinement using the Monte Carlo method | |
| Haddock [ | In-house algorithm that encodes information from identified or predicted protein interfaces in ambiguous interaction restraints to drive the docking process | |
| PyDock [ | Fast protocol which uses electrostatics and desolvation energy to score docking poses generated with FFT-based algorithms | |
| SwissDock [ | Based on the docking software EADock DSS | |
| Rosetta [ | Monte Carlo based multi-scale docking algorithm | |
| DOCK [ | Based in a Geometric Matching Algorithm | |
| DockingServer [ | Includes the PM6 semi-empirical method to AutoDock | |
| Medusa Dock [ | In-house algorithm using a stochastic rotamer library of ligands |