Literature DB >> 34258524

Evaluating the Performance of Sensor-based Bout Detection Algorithms: The Transition Pairing Method.

Paul R Hibbing1, Samuel R LaMunion1, Haileab Hilafu2, Scott E Crouter1.   

Abstract

Bout detection algorithms are used to segment data from wearable sensors, but it is challenging to assess segmentation correctness.
PURPOSE: To present and demonstrate the Transition Pairing Method (TPM), a new method for evaluating the performance of bout detection algorithms.
METHODS: The TPM compares predicted transitions to a criterion measure in terms of number and timing. A true positive is defined as a predicted transition that corresponds with one criterion transition in a mutually exclusive pair. The pairs are established using an extended Gale-Shapley algorithm, and the user specifies a maximum allowable within-pair time lag, above which pairs cannot be formed. Unpaired predictions and criteria are false positives and false negatives, respectively. The demonstration used raw acceleration data from 88 youth who wore ActiGraph GT9X monitors (right hip and non-dominant wrist) during simulated free-living. Youth Sojourn bout detection algorithms were applied (one for each attachment site), and the TPM was used to compare predicted bout transitions to the criterion measure (direct observation). Performance metrics were calculated for each participant, and hip-versus-wrist means were compared using paired T-tests (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: When the maximum allowable lag was 1-s, both algorithms had recall <20% (2.4% difference from one another, p<0.01) and precision <10% (1.4% difference from one another, p<0.001). That is, >80% of criterion transitions were undetected, and >90% of predicted transitions were false positives.
CONCLUSION: The TPM improves on conventional analyses by providing specific information about bout detection in a standardized way that applies to any bout detection algorithm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACCELEROMETER; DYNAMIC SEGMENTATION; PERFORMANCE METRICS; YOUTH SOJOURN MODELS

Year:  2020        PMID: 34258524      PMCID: PMC8274497          DOI: 10.1123/jmpb.2019-0039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Meas Phys Behav        ISSN: 2575-6605


  15 in total

Review 1.  Calibration of accelerometer output for adults.

Authors:  Charles E Matthew
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Event-based analysis of free-living behaviour.

Authors:  Malcolm H Granat
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Change-point detection in time-series data by relative density-ratio estimation.

Authors:  Song Liu; Makoto Yamada; Nigel Collier; Masashi Sugiyama
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2013-02-04

4.  A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins.

Authors:  S B Needleman; C D Wunsch
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Unsupervised detection and analysis of changes in everyday physical activity data.

Authors:  Gina Sprint; Diane J Cook; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Adapted Sojourn Models to Estimate Activity Intensity in Youth: A Suite of Tools.

Authors:  Paul R Hibbing; Laura D Ellingson; Philip M Dixon; Gregory J Welk
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 7.  Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; James J McClain; Robert J Brychta; Kong Y Chen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  A Survey of Methods for Time Series Change Point Detection.

Authors:  Samaneh Aminikhanghahi; Diane J Cook
Journal:  Knowl Inf Syst       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.822

9.  Automated Detection of Activity Transitions for Prompting.

Authors:  Kyle D Feuz; Diane J Cook; Cody Rosasco; Kayela Robertson; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.968

10.  Epoch length and the physical activity bout analysis: an accelerometry research issue.

Authors:  Makoto Ayabe; Hideaki Kumahara; Kazuhiro Morimura; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-01-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  The CNN Hip Accelerometer Posture (CHAP) Method for Classifying Sitting Patterns from Hip Accelerometers: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman; Supun Nakandala; Marta M Jankowska; Dori E Rosenberg; Fatima Tuz-Zahra; John Bellettiere; Jordan Carlson; Paul R Hibbing; Jingjing Zou; Andrea Z Lacroix; Arun Kumar; Loki Natarajan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-11-01

2.  CHAP-child: an open source method for estimating sit-to-stand transitions and sedentary bout patterns from hip accelerometers among children.

Authors:  Jordan A Carlson; Nicola D Ridgers; Supun Nakandala; Rong Zablocki; Fatima Tuz-Zahra; John Bellettiere; Paul R Hibbing; Chelsea Steel; Marta M Jankowska; Dori E Rosenberg; Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman; Jingjing Zou; Andrea Z LaCroix; Arun Kumar; Loki Natarajan
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 8.915

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.