| Literature DB >> 34258017 |
Nikolaj Roth1, Jonas Beyer1, Karl F F Fischer1, Kaiyang Xia2, Tiejun Zhu2, Bo B Iversen1.
Abstract
Although crystalline solids are characterized by their periodic structures, some are only periodic on average and deviate on a local scale. Such disordered crystals with distinct local structures have unique properties arising from both collective and localized behaviour. Different local orderings can exist with identical average structures, making their differences hidden to Bragg diffraction methods. Using high-quality single-crystal X-ray diffuse scattering the local order in thermoelectric half-Heusler Nb1-x CoSb is investigated, for which different local orderings are observed. It is shown that the vacancy distribution follows a vacancy repulsion model and the crystal composition is found always to be close to x = 1/6 irrespective of nominal sample composition. However, the specific synthesis method controls the local order and thereby the thermoelectric properties thus providing a new frontier for tuning material properties. © Nikolaj Roth et al. 2021.Entities:
Keywords: diffuse scattering; hidden phases; local order; thermoelectrics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34258017 PMCID: PMC8256708 DOI: 10.1107/S2052252521005479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IUCrJ ISSN: 2052-2525 Impact factor: 4.769
Average structure refinements for the different Nb1−CoSb samples
Q: quenched samples, SC: slowly cooled samples. The decimal number designates the nominal Nb stoichiometry. Avg. red. is the average data redundancy, i.e. the average number of times each unique reflection was measured.
| Center model | Split model | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample |
| Avg. red. |
|
|
|
| occNb |
|
| occNb | Sb shift (Å) | Co shift (Å) |
| Q-0.81 | 5.896 | 33 | 0.33 | 4.32 | 2.27 | 6.06 | 0.827 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.827 | 0.142 | 0.131 |
| SC-0.81 | 5.894 | 34 | 0.43 | 4.02 | 2.28 | 6.20 | 0.835 | 0.89 | 1.16 | 0.820 | 0.148 | 0.128 |
| Q-0.84 #1 | 5.899 | 19 | 0.40 | 5.36 | 3.23 | 7.39 | 0.820 | 1.06 | 1.33 | 0.825 | 0.142 | 0.130 |
| Q-0.84 #2 | 5.896 | 36 | 0.40 | 4.28 | 2.76 | 6.00 | 0.831 | 0.49 | 0.78 | 0.827 | 0.141 | 0.130 |
| SC-0.84 | 5.895 | 29 | 0.40 | 4.16 | 2.94 | 5.94 | 0.820 | 0.98 | 1.27 | 0.822 | 0.146 | 0.131 |
| Average | 5.896 | 30 | 0.39 | 4.43 | 2.70 | 6.32 | 0.827 | 0.81 | 1.07 | 0.824 | 0.144 | 0.130 |
Figure 1Crystal Structure of Nb1−CoSb. (a) Unit cell of the average structure. Blue: Co, grey; Nb, orange: Sb. Partial shading indicates occupancy. (b) Two models have been tested, one with Sb and Co at the ideal half-Heusler positions and one with off-centred Sb and Co (exaggerated in the figure). (c) Nb5Sb elementary block with the Sb displacement indicated by the arrow. (d) Local relaxation of Co close to a vacancy with the movements of Sb and Co indicated by arrows.
Figure 2Measured and calculated X-ray scattering in the H0L and HHL planes. (a) Measured X-ray scattering from two representative samples of Nb1−CoSb at 300 K with the top row being a Q sample and the bottom row an SC sample. (b) Calculated X-ray scattering with the top row showing a simulated quench model, and the bottom showing a ground state of type ‘BD’ (see text).
Figure 3Measured and calculated 3D-ΔPDF. (a) and (b) Measured 3D-ΔPDF for the ‘SC-0.81’ and ‘Q-0.84 #2’ samples in the 010 plane (same samples as in Fig. 2 ▸). (c) and (d) Integrated peak amplitudes of the 3D-ΔPDF. (e) and (f) Calculated 3D-ΔPDF using the vacancy repulsion model including Sb and Co relaxation. Both plots have a vacancy concentration of x = 1/6 but (e) represents a BD-type ground state and (f) a simulated quench with J 2/J 1 = 0.5. Details of the ground-state structure are given in the supporting information. (g) and (h) Calculated 3D-ΔPDF using the vacancy repulsion model without Sb and Co displacements.
Figure 4Measured and calculated 3D-ΔPDF in the y = 0.27a plane. This plane shows vectors which are all related to correlations between Co and other atoms. The top row shows the measured 3D-ΔPDF for the two representative samples, and the bottom row shows the corresponding 3D-ΔPDF calculated from the vacancy repulsion model with structural relaxations. Note that the experiment and model 3D-ΔPDF are shown on different scales. The measured 3D-ΔPDF has stronger amplitudes, indicating the model to still have something missing.