Bryan A Sisk1, Ginny L Schulz1, Erica C Kaye2, Justin N Baker2,3, Jennifer W Mack4, James M DuBois5. 1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 2. Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. 3. Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. 4. Division of Population Sciences, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Abstract
Background: Parents previously identified eight core functions of communication with clinicians in pediatric oncology. Objective: To determine clinicians' views on communication functions in pediatric oncology. Design: In 10 focus groups with 59 clinicians at two academic centers, we asked open-ended questions about communication goals and purposes. Then we presented definitions of eight communication functions previously described by parents and explored clinicians' perspectives. Setting/Subjects: We performed separate focus groups for nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals. Measurements: Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts. Results: Clinicians identified six functions in response to open-ended questions. After reviewing the eight functions described by parents, all clinicians agreed with the framework: building relationships, exchanging information, making decisions, enabling family self-management, managing uncertainty, responding to emotions, supporting hope, and providing validation. Conclusions: Pediatric oncology clinicians corroborated this functional communication framework. Clinicians and researchers can utilize this framework to guide care and research in the future.
Background: Parents previously identified eight core functions of communication with clinicians in pediatric oncology. Objective: To determine clinicians' views on communication functions in pediatric oncology. Design: In 10 focus groups with 59 clinicians at two academic centers, we asked open-ended questions about communication goals and purposes. Then we presented definitions of eight communication functions previously described by parents and explored clinicians' perspectives. Setting/Subjects: We performed separate focus groups for nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals. Measurements: Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts. Results: Clinicians identified six functions in response to open-ended questions. After reviewing the eight functions described by parents, all clinicians agreed with the framework: building relationships, exchanging information, making decisions, enabling family self-management, managing uncertainty, responding to emotions, supporting hope, and providing validation. Conclusions: Pediatric oncology clinicians corroborated this functional communication framework. Clinicians and researchers can utilize this framework to guide care and research in the future.
Authors: Douglas L Hill; Jennifer A Faerber; Yimei Li; Victoria A Miller; Karen W Carroll; Wynne Morrison; Pamela S Hinds; Chris Feudtner Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jennifer W Mack; Joanne Wolfe; E Francis Cook; Holcombe E Grier; Paul D Cleary; Jane C Weeks Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anthony L Back; Robert M Arnold; Walter F Baile; Kelly A Fryer-Edwards; Stewart C Alexander; Gwyn E Barley; Ted A Gooley; James A Tulsky Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-03-12
Authors: Chris Feudtner; Jennifer K Walter; Jennifer A Faerber; Douglas L Hill; Karen W Carroll; Cynthia J Mollen; Victoria A Miller; Wynne E Morrison; David Munson; Tammy I Kang; Pamela S Hinds Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Bryan A Sisk; Annie B Friedrich; Erica C Kaye; Justin N Baker; Jennifer W Mack; James M DuBois Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Dylan E Graetz; Ana Caceres-Serrano; Venkatraman Radhakrishnan; Carmen E Salaverria; Joyce B Kambugu; Bryan A Sisk Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 6.921