Literature DB >> 32985121

NeuroSAFE frozen section during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: peri-operative and histopathological outcomes from the NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility randomized controlled trial.

Eoin Dinneen1,2, Aiman Haider3, Jack Grierson1, Alex Freeman3, Jon Oxley4, Tim Briggs2, Senthil Nathan2, Norman R Williams1, Chris Brew-Graves5, Raj Persad6, Jon Aning6, Charles Jameson3, Marzena Ratynska3, Imen Ben-Salha3, Rhys Ball3, Rosie Clow2, Clare Allen2, Daniel Heffernan-Ho2, John Kelly1,2, Greg Shaw1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report on the methods, peri-operative outcomes and histopathological concordance between frozen and final section from the NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility study (NCT03317990). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2018 and March 2019, 49 patients at two UK centres underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Twenty-five patient were randomized to NeuroSAFE RARP (intervention arm) and 24 to standard RARP (control arm). Frozen section was compared to final paraffin section margin assessment in the 25 patients in the NeuroSAFE arm. Operation timings and complications were collected prospectively in both arms.
RESULTS: Fifty neurovascular bundles (NVBs) from 25 patients in the NeuroSAFE arm were analysed. When analysed by each pathological section (n = 250, average five per side), we noted a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.2%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.994 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.985 to 1; P ≤0.001). On an NVB basis (n = 50), sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 92.7%, and the AUC was 0.963 (95% CI 0.914 to 1; P ≤0.001). NeuroSAFE RARP lasted a mean of 3 h 16 min (knife to skin to off table, 95% CI 3 h 2 min-3 h 30 min) compared to 2 h 4 min (95% CI 2 h 2 min-2 h 25 min; P ≤0.001) for standard RARP. There was no morbidity associated with the additional length of operating time on in the NeuroSAFE arm.
CONCLUSION: This feasibility study demonstrates the safety, reproducibility and excellent histopathological concordance of the NeuroSAFE technique in the NeuroSAFE PROOF trial. Although the technique increases the duration of RARP, this does not cause short-term harm. Confirmation of feasibility has led to the opening of the fully powered NeuroSAFE PROOF randomized controlled trial, which is currently under way at four sites in the UK.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; NeuroSAFE; frozen section; margins; nerve-sparing; prostate cancer; robotic prostatectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 32985121     DOI: 10.1111/bju.15256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Clare Allen; Tom Strange; Daniel Heffernan-Ho; Jelena Banjeglav; Jamie Lindsay; John-Patrick Mulligan; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Ashwin Sridhar; Jack Grierson; Aiman Haider; Christos Panayi; Dominic Patel; Alex Freeman; Jonathan Aning; Raj Persad; Imran Ahmad; Lorenzo Dutto; Neil Oakley; Alessandro Ambrosi; Tom Parry; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Francesco Giganti; Greg Shaw; Shonit Punwani
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23

Review 2.  [Organoids for the advancement of intraoperative diagnostic procedures].

Authors:  N Harland; B Amend; N Lipke; S Y Brucker; F Fend; A Herkommer; H Lensch; O Sawodny; T E Schäffer; K Schenke-Layland; C Tarín Sauer; W Aicher; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The association of a risk group with positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology examination after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tomasz Kupski; Michał Małek; Igal Mor
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-10-13

4.  NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Jack Grierson; Ricardo Almeida-Magana; Rosie Clow; Aiman Haider; Clare Allen; Daniel Heffernan-Ho; Alex Freeman; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Susan Mallett; Chris Brew-Graves; Nicola Muirhead; Norman R Williams; Elena Pizzo; Raj Persad; Jon Aning; Lyndsey Johnson; Jon Oxley; Neil Oakley; Susan Morgan; Fawzia Tahir; Imran Ahmad; Lorenzo Dutto; Jonathan M Salmond; Anand Kelkar; John Kelly; Greg Shaw
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.728

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.