Nithya Ramakrishnan1,2, Marijn Lijffijt1,2, Charles E Green3, Nicholas L Balderston4, Nicholas Murphy1,2,5, Christian Grillon6, Tabish Iqbal1,2, Brittany Vo-Le1,2, Brittany O'Brien1,2, James W Murrough7, Alan C Swann1,2, Sanjay J Mathew1,2,5. 1. Menninger Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 2. Michael E. Debakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 5. The Menninger Clinic, Houston, Texas, USA. 6. Intramural Research Program, NIMH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 7. Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Depression and Anxiety Center for Discovery and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with hyperarousal and stress reactivity, features consistent with behavioral sensitization. In this Phase 1b, parallel-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we tested whether the selective low-trapping N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist [Lanicemine (BHV-5500)] blocks expression of behavioral sensitization. METHODS: Twenty-four participants with elevated anxiety potentiated startle (APS) and moderate-to-severe PTSD symptoms received three infusions of lanicemine 1.0 mg/ml (100 mg) or matching placebo (0.9% saline) (1:1 ratio), over a 5-day period. The primary outcome was change in APS from baseline to end of third infusion. We also examined changes in EEG gamma-band oscillatory activity as measures of NMDAR target engagement and explored Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) hyperarousal scores. RESULTS: Lanicemine was safe and well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. Using Bayesian statistical inference, the posterior probability that lanicemine outperformed placebo on APS T-score after three infusions was 38%. However, after the first infusion, there was a 90% chance that lanicemine outperformed placebo in attenuating APS T-score by a standardized effect size more than 0.4. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated successful occupancy of lanicemine on NMDAR using gamma-band EEG and effects on hyperarousal symptoms (Cohen's d = 0.75). While lanicemine strongly attenuated APS following a single infusion, differential changes from placebo after three infusions was likely obscured by habituation effects. To our knowledge, this is the first use of APS in the context of an experimental medicine trial of a NMDAR antagonist in PTSD. These findings support selective NMDAR antagonism as a viable pharmacological strategy for salient aspects of PTSD.
BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with hyperarousal and stress reactivity, features consistent with behavioral sensitization. In this Phase 1b, parallel-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we tested whether the selective low-trapping N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist [Lanicemine (BHV-5500)] blocks expression of behavioral sensitization. METHODS: Twenty-four participants with elevated anxiety potentiated startle (APS) and moderate-to-severe PTSD symptoms received three infusions of lanicemine 1.0 mg/ml (100 mg) or matching placebo (0.9% saline) (1:1 ratio), over a 5-day period. The primary outcome was change in APS from baseline to end of third infusion. We also examined changes in EEG gamma-band oscillatory activity as measures of NMDAR target engagement and explored Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) hyperarousal scores. RESULTS: Lanicemine was safe and well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. Using Bayesian statistical inference, the posterior probability that lanicemine outperformed placebo on APS T-score after three infusions was 38%. However, after the first infusion, there was a 90% chance that lanicemine outperformed placebo in attenuating APS T-score by a standardized effect size more than 0.4. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated successful occupancy of lanicemine on NMDAR using gamma-band EEG and effects on hyperarousal symptoms (Cohen's d = 0.75). While lanicemine strongly attenuated APS following a single infusion, differential changes from placebo after three infusions was likely obscured by habituation effects. To our knowledge, this is the first use of APS in the context of an experimental medicine trial of a NMDAR antagonist in PTSD. These findings support selective NMDAR antagonism as a viable pharmacological strategy for salient aspects of PTSD.
Authors: Christian Grillon; Johanna M P Baas; Daniel S Pine; Shmuel Lissek; Megan Lawley; Valerie Ellis; Jessica Levine Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2006-04-21 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Christian Grillon; Daniel S Pine; Johanna M P Baas; Megan Lawley; Valerie Ellis; Dennis S Charney Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-07-29 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Adriana Feder; Sara Costi; Sarah B Rutter; Abigail B Collins; Usha Govindarajulu; Manish K Jha; Sarah R Horn; Marin Kautz; Morgan Corniquel; Katherine A Collins; Laura Bevilacqua; Andrew M Glasgow; Jess Brallier; Robert H Pietrzak; James W Murrough; Dennis S Charney Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: C Sophia Albott; Kelvin O Lim; Miriam K Forbes; Christopher Erbes; Susanna J Tye; John G Grabowski; Paul Thuras; Tegan M Batres-Y-Carr; Joseph Wels; Paulo R Shiroma Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2018 May/Jun Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Boris B Quednow; Kai-Uwe Kühn; Richard Stelzenmuelle; Klaus Hoenig; Wolfgang Maier; Michael Wagner Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Christelle Glangetas; Léma Massi; Giulia R Fois; Marion Jalabert; Delphine Girard; Marco Diana; Keisuke Yonehara; Botond Roska; Chun Xu; Andreas Lüthi; Stéphanie Caille; François Georges Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Marijn Lijffijt; Nicholas Murphy; Sidra Iqbal; Charles E Green; Tabish Iqbal; Lee C Chang; Colin N Haile; Lorna C Hirsch; Nithya Ramakrishnan; Dylan A Fall; Alan C Swann; Rayan K Al Jurdi; Sanjay J Mathew Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-11-27 Impact factor: 8.294