BACKGROUND: The startle reflex is potentiated by aversive states. It has been proposed that phasic startle potentiation to a threat cue and sustained startle potentiation to contextual stimuli reflect distinct processes mediated by different brain structures. The present study tested the hypothesis that alprazolam would reduce the sustained startle potentiation to contextual threats but not the startle potentiation to a threat cue. METHODS:Sixteen healthy subjects received each of four treatments: placebo, .5 mg of alprazolam, 1 mg of alprazolam, and 50 mg of diphenhydramine (Benadryl) in a crossover design. Participants were exposed to three conditions, including one in which predictable aversive shocks were signaled by a cue, a second in which shocks were administered unpredictably, and a third condition in which no shocks were anticipated. Acoustic startle were delivered regularly across conditions. RESULTS:Phasic startle potentiation to the threat cue in the predictable condition was not affected by alprazolam. In contrast, the sustained increase in startle in the predictable and unpredictable conditions was reduced significantly by the high dose of alprazolam. CONCLUSIONS: Startle responses to an explicit threat cue and to an aversive context are psychopharmacologically distinct, suggesting that they may represent functionally dissociable aversive states.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The startle reflex is potentiated by aversive states. It has been proposed that phasic startle potentiation to a threat cue and sustained startle potentiation to contextual stimuli reflect distinct processes mediated by different brain structures. The present study tested the hypothesis that alprazolam would reduce the sustained startle potentiation to contextual threats but not the startle potentiation to a threat cue. METHODS: Sixteen healthy subjects received each of four treatments: placebo, .5 mg of alprazolam, 1 mg of alprazolam, and 50 mg of diphenhydramine (Benadryl) in a crossover design. Participants were exposed to three conditions, including one in which predictable aversive shocks were signaled by a cue, a second in which shocks were administered unpredictably, and a third condition in which no shocks were anticipated. Acoustic startle were delivered regularly across conditions. RESULTS: Phasic startle potentiation to the threat cue in the predictable condition was not affected by alprazolam. In contrast, the sustained increase in startle in the predictable and unpredictable conditions was reduced significantly by the high dose of alprazolam. CONCLUSIONS:Startle responses to an explicit threat cue and to an aversive context are psychopharmacologically distinct, suggesting that they may represent functionally dissociable aversive states.
Authors: Shmuel Lissek; Kaebah Orme; Dana J McDowell; Linda L Johnson; David A Luckenbaugh; Johanna M Baas; Brian R Cornwell; Christian Grillon Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Brady D Nelson; Sarah Kate McGowan; Casey Sarapas; E Jenna Robison-Andrew; Sarah E Altman; Miranda L Campbell; Stephanie M Gorka; Andrea C Katz; Stewart A Shankman Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2013-08
Authors: Elizabeth D Ballard; Dawn F Ionescu; Jennifer L Vande Voort; Elizabeth E Slonena; Jose A Franco-Chaves; Carlos A Zarate; Christian Grillon Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Markus Fendt; Hugo Bürki; Stefan Imobersteg; Kurt Lingenhöhl; Kevin H McAllister; David Orain; Doncho P Uzunov; Frederique Chaperon Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Stephanie M Gorka; Sarah Kate McGowan; Miranda L Campbell; Brady D Nelson; Casey Sarapas; Jeffrey R Bishop; Stewart A Shankman Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Christian Grillon; Shmuel Lissek; Stephanie Rabin; Dana McDowell; Sharone Dvir; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 18.112