Natalie M Johnson1, Aline Rodrigues Hoffmann2, Jonathan C Behlen3, Carmen Lau2, Drew Pendleton3, Navada Harvey3, Ross Shore3, Yixin Li4, Jingshu Chen5, Yanan Tian5, Renyi Zhang4. 1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. nmjohnson@tamu.edu. 2. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. 3. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. 4. Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. 5. Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Particulate matter (PM), a major component of ambient air pollution, accounts for a substantial burden of diseases and fatality worldwide. Maternal exposure to PM during pregnancy is particularly harmful to children's health since this is a phase of rapid human growth and development. METHOD: In this review, we synthesize the scientific evidence on adverse health outcomes in children following prenatal exposure to the smallest toxic components, fine (PM2.5) and ultrafine (PM0.1) PM. We highlight the established and emerging findings from epidemiologic studies and experimental models. RESULTS: Maternal exposure to fine and ultrafine PM directly and indirectly yields numerous adverse birth outcomes and impacts on children's respiratory systems, immune status, brain development, and cardiometabolic health. The biological mechanisms underlying adverse effects include direct placental translocation of ultrafine particles, placental and systemic maternal oxidative stress and inflammation elicited by both fine and ultrafine PM, epigenetic changes, and potential endocrine effects that influence long-term health. CONCLUSION: Policies to reduce maternal exposure and health consequences in children should be a high priority. PM2.5 levels are regulated, yet it is recognized that minority and low socioeconomic status groups experience disproportionate exposures. Moreover, PM0.1 levels are not routinely measured or currently regulated. Consequently, preventive strategies that inform neighborhood/regional planning and clinical/nutritional recommendations are needed to mitigate maternal exposure and ultimately protect children's health.
BACKGROUND: Particulate matter (PM), a major component of ambient air pollution, accounts for a substantial burden of diseases and fatality worldwide. Maternal exposure to PM during pregnancy is particularly harmful to children's health since this is a phase of rapid human growth and development. METHOD: In this review, we synthesize the scientific evidence on adverse health outcomes in children following prenatal exposure to the smallest toxic components, fine (PM2.5) and ultrafine (PM0.1) PM. We highlight the established and emerging findings from epidemiologic studies and experimental models. RESULTS: Maternal exposure to fine and ultrafine PM directly and indirectly yields numerous adverse birth outcomes and impacts on children's respiratory systems, immune status, brain development, and cardiometabolic health. The biological mechanisms underlying adverse effects include direct placental translocation of ultrafine particles, placental and systemic maternal oxidative stress and inflammation elicited by both fine and ultrafine PM, epigenetic changes, and potential endocrine effects that influence long-term health. CONCLUSION: Policies to reduce maternal exposure and health consequences in children should be a high priority. PM2.5 levels are regulated, yet it is recognized that minority and low socioeconomic status groups experience disproportionate exposures. Moreover, PM0.1 levels are not routinely measured or currently regulated. Consequently, preventive strategies that inform neighborhood/regional planning and clinical/nutritional recommendations are needed to mitigate maternal exposure and ultimately protect children's health.
Authors: Devon C Payne-Sturges; Melanie A Marty; Frederica Perera; Mark D Miller; Maureen Swanson; Kristie Ellickson; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Beate Ritz; John Balmes; Laura Anderko; Evelyn O Talbott; Robert Gould; Irva Hertz-Picciotto Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 11.561
Authors: Fataha Rahman; Brent A Coull; Kecia N Carroll; Ander Wilson; Allan C Just; Itai Kloog; Xueying Zhang; Rosalind J Wright; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Saima Abdul Jabbar; Laila Tul Qadar; Sulaman Ghafoor; Lubna Rasheed; Zouina Sarfraz; Azza Sarfraz; Muzna Sarfraz; Miguel Felix; Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jonathan C Behlen; Carmen H Lau; Yixin Li; Prit Dhagat; Jone A Stanley; Aline Rodrigues Hoffman; Michael C Golding; Renyi Zhang; Natalie M Johnson Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 4.109
Authors: Carmen H Lau; Drew Pendleton; Nicholas L Drury; Jiayun Zhao; Yixin Li; Renyi Zhang; Gus A Wright; Aline Rodrigues Hoffmann; Natalie M Johnson Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2022-01-21
Authors: Jonathan C Behlen; Carmen H Lau; Drew Pendleton; Yixin Li; Aline Rodrigues Hoffmann; Michael C Golding; Renyi Zhang; Natalie M Johnson Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2022-02-10