Zhang Hehua1, Chang Qing2, Gao Shanyan2, Wu Qijun2, Zhao Yuhong3. 1. Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Huaxiang Road No. 39, Tiexi District, China. 2. Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Sanhao Street, No. 36, Heping District, China. 3. Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Huaxiang Road No. 39, Tiexi District, China; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Sanhao Street, No. 36, Heping District, China. Electronic address: zhaoyh@sj-hospital.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There has been no clear consensus about whether prenatal exposure to air pollution contributes to the development of wheezing and asthma in children. We conducted a systematic review to analyze the association between exposure to different pollutants during pregnancy and the development of childhood wheezing and asthma. METHODS: We systematically reviewed epidemiological studies published through June 6, 2017 available in the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. We included studies that examined the association between prenatal exposure to any air pollutants except tobacco smoke and the incidence or prevalence of "wheezing" or "asthma" from birth to 14 years of age. We extracted key characteristics of each included study using a template of predefined data items. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists to assess the validity of each included study. We conducted overall and subgroup meta-analyses for each summary exposure-outcome association. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by using a random effects model. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met our eligibility criteria. There was notable variability in exposure assessment methods. The overall random effects risk estimates (95% CI) of different pollutants were 1.04 (0.94-1.15) aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), 1.04 (1.01-1.07) NO2, 1.4 (0.97-2.03) PM2.5 for childhood wheeze and 1.07 (1.01-1.14) NO2, 1 (0.97-1.03) PM2.5, 1.02 (0.98-1.07) SO2, 1.08 (1.05-1.12) PM10 for childhood asthma. Minimal heterogeneity was seen for PAH and SO2, while some heterogeneity was observed for PM10, PM2.5 and NO2. CONCLUSIONS: The overall and subgroup risk estimates from the meta-analyses showed statistically significant associations between prenatal exposures to NO2, SO2, and PM10 and the risk of wheezing and asthma development in childhood. There is insufficient evidence to show an effect of prenatal exposure to BC, CO, and O3 on childhood wheezing and asthma. Further studies are needed to examine the individual compounds' effects.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There has been no clear consensus about whether prenatal exposure to air pollution contributes to the development of wheezing and asthma in children. We conducted a systematic review to analyze the association between exposure to different pollutants during pregnancy and the development of childhood wheezing and asthma. METHODS: We systematically reviewed epidemiological studies published through June 6, 2017 available in the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. We included studies that examined the association between prenatal exposure to any air pollutants except tobacco smoke and the incidence or prevalence of "wheezing" or "asthma" from birth to 14 years of age. We extracted key characteristics of each included study using a template of predefined data items. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists to assess the validity of each included study. We conducted overall and subgroup meta-analyses for each summary exposure-outcome association. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by using a random effects model. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met our eligibility criteria. There was notable variability in exposure assessment methods. The overall random effects risk estimates (95% CI) of different pollutants were 1.04 (0.94-1.15) aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), 1.04 (1.01-1.07) NO2, 1.4 (0.97-2.03) PM2.5 for childhood wheeze and 1.07 (1.01-1.14) NO2, 1 (0.97-1.03) PM2.5, 1.02 (0.98-1.07) SO2, 1.08 (1.05-1.12) PM10 for childhood asthma. Minimal heterogeneity was seen for PAH and SO2, while some heterogeneity was observed for PM10, PM2.5 and NO2. CONCLUSIONS: The overall and subgroup risk estimates from the meta-analyses showed statistically significant associations between prenatal exposures to NO2, SO2, and PM10 and the risk of wheezing and asthma development in childhood. There is insufficient evidence to show an effect of prenatal exposure to BC, CO, and O3 on childhood wheezing and asthma. Further studies are needed to examine the individual compounds' effects.
Authors: Ana M Mora; Jane A Hoppin; Leonel Córdoba; Juan C Cano; Manuel Soto-Martínez; Brenda Eskenazi; Christian H Lindh; Berna van Wendel de Joode Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Joanne E Sordillo; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Karen Switkowski; Brent Coull; Heike Gibson; Mary Rice; Thomas A E Platts-Mills; Itai Kloog; Augusto A Litonjua; Diane R Gold; Emily Oken Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Chloe Friedman; Dana Dabelea; Deborah S K Thomas; Jennifer L Peel; John L Adgate; Sheryl Magzamen; Sheena E Martenies; William B Allshouse; Anne P Starling Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: Natalie M Johnson; Aline Rodrigues Hoffmann; Jonathan C Behlen; Carmen Lau; Drew Pendleton; Navada Harvey; Ross Shore; Yixin Li; Jingshu Chen; Yanan Tian; Renyi Zhang Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 3.674