Literature DB >> 34252325

Looking for Semantic Similarity: What a Vector-Space Model of Semantics Can Tell Us About Attention in Real-World Scenes.

Taylor R Hayes1, John M Henderson1,2.   

Abstract

The visual world contains more information than we can perceive and understand in any given moment. Therefore, we must prioritize important scene regions for detailed analysis. Semantic knowledge gained through experience is theorized to play a central role in determining attentional priority in real-world scenes but is poorly understood. Here, we examined the relationship between object semantics and attention by combining a vector-space model of semantics with eye movements in scenes. In this approach, the vector-space semantic model served as the basis for a concept map, an index of the spatial distribution of the semantic similarity of objects across a given scene. The results showed a strong positive relationship between the semantic similarity of a scene region and viewers' focus of attention; specifically, greater attention was given to more semantically related scene regions. We conclude that object semantics play a critical role in guiding attention through real-world scenes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; eye movements; object semantics; scene perception

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34252325      PMCID: PMC8726595          DOI: 10.1177/0956797621994768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  32 in total

Review 1.  Eye movements in natural behavior.

Authors:  Mary Hayhoe; Dana Ballard
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search.

Authors:  Antonio Torralba; Aude Oliva; Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The time course of picture viewing.

Authors:  J R Antes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-07

6.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Objects predict fixations better than early saliency.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Merrielle Spain; Pietro Perona
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Farahnaz Ahmed Wick; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-06

10.  How Well Can Saliency Models Predict Fixation Selection in Scenes Beyond Central Bias? A New Approach to Model Evaluation Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Wolfgang Einhäuser; Immo Schütz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  7 in total

1.  Meaning maps detect the removal of local semantic scene content but deep saliency models do not.

Authors:  Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Rapid Extraction of the Spatial Distribution of Physical Saliency and Semantic Informativeness from Natural Scenes in the Human Brain.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Look at what I can do: Object affordances guide visual attention while speakers describe potential actions.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Madison Barker; Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention.

Authors:  Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Modelling brain representations of abstract concepts.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Arthur M Jacobs; Radoslaw M Cichy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Semantic object-scene inconsistencies affect eye movements, but not in the way predicted by contextualized meaning maps.

Authors:  Marek A Pedziwiatr; Matthias Kümmerer; Thomas S A Wallis; Matthias Bethge; Christoph Teufel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Meaning and expected surfaces combine to guide attention during visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Deborah A Cronin; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.