Sanjay Dhawan1, Andrew S Venteicher1, William E Butler2, Bob S Carter2, Clark C Chen3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. ccchen@umn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic needle biopsy remains the cornerstone for tissue diagnosis for tumors located in regions of the brain that are difficult to access through open surgery. OBJECTIVE: We perform a meta-analysis of the literature to examine the relation between number of samples taken during biopsy and diagnostic yield, morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We identified 2416 patients from 28 cohorts in studies published in PubMed database that studied stereotactic needle biopsies for tumor indications. Meta-analysis by proportions and meta-regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: On meta-analysis, the morbidity profile of the published needle biopsy studies clustered into three groups: studies that performed < 3 samples (n = 8), 3-6 samples (n = 13), and > 6 samples during biopsy (n = 7). Pooled estimates for biopsy related morbidity were 4.3%, 16.3%, and 17% for studies reporting < 3, 3-6, and > 6 biopsy samples, respectively. While these morbidity estimates significantly differed (p < 0.001), the diagnostic yields reported for studies performing < 3 biopsies, 3-6 samples, and > 6 samples were comparable. Pooled estimates of diagnostic yield for these three groups were 90.4%, 93.8%, and 88.1%, respectively. Mortality did not significantly differ between studies reporting differing number of samples taken during biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that morbidity risk in needle biopsy is non-linearly associated with the number of samples taken. There was no association between the number of biopsies taken, and diagnostic yield or mortality.
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic needle biopsy remains the cornerstone for tissue diagnosis for tumors located in regions of the brain that are difficult to access through open surgery. OBJECTIVE: We perform a meta-analysis of the literature to examine the relation between number of samples taken during biopsy and diagnostic yield, morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We identified 2416 patients from 28 cohorts in studies published in PubMed database that studied stereotactic needle biopsies for tumor indications. Meta-analysis by proportions and meta-regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: On meta-analysis, the morbidity profile of the published needle biopsy studies clustered into three groups: studies that performed < 3 samples (n = 8), 3-6 samples (n = 13), and > 6 samples during biopsy (n = 7). Pooled estimates for biopsy related morbidity were 4.3%, 16.3%, and 17% for studies reporting < 3, 3-6, and > 6 biopsy samples, respectively. While these morbidity estimates significantly differed (p < 0.001), the diagnostic yields reported for studies performing < 3 biopsies, 3-6 samples, and > 6 samples were comparable. Pooled estimates of diagnostic yield for these three groups were 90.4%, 93.8%, and 88.1%, respectively. Mortality did not significantly differ between studies reporting differing number of samples taken during biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that morbidity risk in needle biopsy is non-linearly associated with the number of samples taken. There was no association between the number of biopsies taken, and diagnostic yield or mortality.
Authors: S H Kim; W S Chang; J P Kim; Y K Minn; J Choi; J W Chang; T S Kim; Y G Park; J H Chang Journal: Clin Neuropathol Date: 2011 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.368
Authors: Amanda Hambrecht; Matthew J Duenas; Edward J Hahn; Henry E Aryan; Samuel A Hughes; Dawn Waters; Michael L Levy; Rahul Jandial Journal: Surg Neurol Int Date: 2013-04-24
Authors: Otto M Henriksen; María Del Mar Álvarez-Torres; Patricia Figueiredo; Gilbert Hangel; Vera C Keil; Ruben E Nechifor; Frank Riemer; Kathleen M Schmainda; Esther A H Warnert; Evita C Wiegers; Thomas C Booth Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Sophie Katzendobler; Anna Do; Jonathan Weller; Mario M Dorostkar; Nathalie L Albert; Robert Forbrig; Maximilian Niyazi; Rupert Egensperger; Niklas Thon; Joerg Christian Tonn; Stefanie Quach Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 4.003