| Literature DB >> 34251089 |
Uxua Ortecho-Zuta1, Carla Caroline de Oliveira Duque1, Rafael Antonio de Oliveira Ribeiro1, Maria Luísa Leite1, Diana Gabriela Soares2, Josimeri Hebling3, André Luiz Fraga Briso4, Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa5.
Abstract
Evaluate the kinetics of hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) degradation, esthetic efficacy and cytotoxicity of a bleaching gel with 35%H2 O2 applied on enamel previously covered or not with polymeric nanofibrillar scaffold (SNan), polymeric primer catalyst (PPol), and both. Standardized enamel/dentin discs (n = 128) obtained from bovine teeth were adapted to pulp chambers. After covering enamel with the polymeric products, the bleaching gel was applied for 45 min, establishing the following groups: G1: no treatment (negative control); G2: 35%H2 O2 (positive control); G3: SNan; G4: PPol; G5: SNan + PPol; G6: SNan + 35%H2 O2 ; G7: PPol + 35%H2 O2 ; G8: SNan + PPol + 35%H2 O2 . The kinetics of H2 O2 degradation (n = 8), bleaching efficacy (ΔE/ΔWI; n = 8), trans-amelodentinal cytotoxicity (n = 8), and cell morphology (n = 4) were assessed (ANOVA/Tukey test; p < 0.05). Greater H2 O2 degradation occurred in G7 and G8. Bleaching efficacy (ΔE) was higher in G6, G7, and G8 in comparison with G2 (p < 0.05). However, no difference was observed for ΔWI (p > 0.05). G8 presented the lower level of trans-amelodentinal diffusion of H2 O2 , oxidative stress, and toxicity to the MDPC-23 cells (p < 0.05). Polymeric biomaterials increased the kinetics of H2 O2 decomposition, as well as maintained the esthetic efficacy and minimized the cytotoxicity caused by a bleaching gel with 35%H2 O2 . CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Application of a bleaching gel with 35%H2 O2 on enamel previously covered by polymeric biomaterials maintains the esthetic efficacy and reduces the cytotoxicity caused by a single session of in-office dental bleaching.Entities:
Keywords: bleaching; color science; dental materials; endo/pulp biology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34251089 DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Esthet Restor Dent ISSN: 1496-4155 Impact factor: 2.843