Literature DB >> 34250500

Prolonged, High-Fidelity Simulation for Study of Patient Care in Resource-Limited Medical Contexts and for Technology Comparative Effectiveness Testing.

Jeremy C Pamplin1,2, Sena R Veazey3, Joanne De Howitt4,5, Katy Cohen1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Stacie Barczak4,5, Mark Espinoza3,5, Dave Luellen3, Kevin Ross6, Maria Serio-Melvin3, Mary McCarthy7, Christopher J Colombo2,4.   

Abstract

Most high-fidelity medical simulation is of limited duration, used for education and training, and rarely intended to study medical technology. U.S. caregivers working in prehospital, resource-limited settings may need to manage patients for extended periods (hours to days). This "prolonged casualty care" occurs during military, wilderness, humanitarian, disaster, and space medicine. We sought to develop a standardized simulation model that accurately reflects prolonged casualty care in order to study caregiver decision-making and performance, training requirements, and technology use in prolonged casualty care.
DESIGN: Model development.
SETTING: High-fidelity simulation laboratory.
SUBJECTS: None.
INTERVENTIONS: We interviewed subject matter experts to identify relevant prolonged casualty care medical challenges and selected two casualty types to further develop our model: a large thermal burn model and a severe hypoxia model. We met with a multidisciplinary group of experts in prolonged casualty care, nursing, and critical care to describe how these problems could evolve over time and how to contextualize the problems with a background story and clinical environment with expected resource availability. Following initial scenario drafting, we tested the models with expert clinicians. After multiple tests, we selected the hypoxia model for refinement and testing with inexperienced providers. We tested and refined this model until two research teams could proctor the scenario consistently despite subject performance variability.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We developed a 6-8-hour simulation model that represented a 14-hour scenario. This model of pneumonia evolved from presentation to severe hypoxia necessitating advanced interventions including airway, breathing, and shock management. The model included: context description, caregiver orientation scripts, hourly progressive physiology tracks corresponding to caregiver interventions, intervention/procedure-specific physiology tracks, intervention checklists, equipment lists, prestudy checklists, photographs of setups, procedure, telementor, and role player scripts, business rules, and data collection methods.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first standardized, high-fidelity simulation model of prolonged casualty care described in the literature. It may be used to assess caregiver performance and patient outcomes resulting from that performance during a complex, 14-hour prolonged casualty care scenario. Because it is standardized, the model may be used to compare differences in the impact of new technologies upon caregiver performance and simulated patient outcomes..
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disaster medicine; high-fidelity simulation training; military medicine; technology assessment; telemedicine; wilderness medicine

Year:  2021        PMID: 34250500      PMCID: PMC8263321          DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Explor        ISSN: 2639-8028


  24 in total

1.  The role of immersion and narrative in mediated presence: the virtual hospital experience.

Authors:  Alessandra Gorini; Claret S Capideville; Gianluca De Leo; Fabrizia Mantovani; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2010-07-22

2.  MEASURING WORKLOAD OF ICU NURSES WITH A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY: THE NASA TASK LOAD INDEX (TLX).

Authors:  Peter Hoonakker; Pascale Carayon; Ayse Gurses; Roger Brown; Kerry McGuire; Adjhaporn Khunlertkit; James M Walker
Journal:  IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng       Date:  2011-10-12

3.  Tele-Critical Care: An Update From the Society of Critical Care Medicine Tele-ICU Committee.

Authors:  Sanjay Subramanian; Jeremy C Pamplin; Marilyn Hravnak; Christina Hielsberg; Richard Riker; Fred Rincon; Krzysztof Laudanski; Lana A Adzhigirey; M Anas Moughrabieh; Fiona A Winterbottom; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Technical innovations that may facilitate real-time telementoring of damage control surgery in austere environments: a proof of concept comparative evaluation of the importance of surgical experience, telepresence, gravity and mentoring in the conduct of damage control laparotomies.

Authors:  Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Anthony LaPorta; Susan Brien; Tim Leslie; Elon Glassberg; Jessica McKee; Chad G Ball; Heather E Wright Beatty; Jocelyn Keillor; Derek J Roberts; Homer Tien
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Improving Clinician Decisions and Communication in Critical Care Using Novel Information Technology.

Authors:  Jeremy Pamplin; Christopher P Nemeth; Maria L Serio-Melvin; Sarah J Murray; Gregory T Rule; Elizabeth S Veinott; Sena R Veazey; Anthony J Hamilton; Craig A Fenrich; Dawn E Laufersweiler; Jose Salinas
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: An application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety.

Authors:  Richard J Holden
Journal:  Cogn Technol Work       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.372

7.  Prolonged Field Care Working Group Position Paper: Operational Context for Prolonged Field Care.

Authors:  Christopher J Mohr; Sean Keenan
Journal:  J Spec Oper Med       Date:  2015

8.  Evaluation of Contingency Telemedical Support to Improve Casualty Care at a Simulated Military Intermediate Resuscitation Facility: The EM-ANGEL Study.

Authors:  Robert T Gerhardt; Jonathon Berry; Robert L Mabry; Lawrence Flournoy; Robert G Arnold; Christopher Hults; John B Robinson; Robert A Thaxton; Ramon Cestero; Jason D Heiner; Alexandra R Koller; Kevin M Cox; Jay N Patterson; Warren R Dalton; Anne L McKeague; Gary Gilbert; Carl Manemeit; Bruce D Adams
Journal:  J Spec Oper Med       Date:  2014

9.  Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond.

Authors:  David A Cook; Rose Hatala
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-07

10.  The impact of contextualization on immersion in healthcare simulation.

Authors:  Henrik Engström; Magnus Andersson Hagiwara; Per Backlund; Mikael Lebram; Lars Lundberg; Mikael Johannesson; Anders Sterner; Hanna Maurin Söderholm
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.