Mizuki Nishino1,2, Fangxin Hong3, Biagio Ricciuti4, Hiroto Hatabu1,2, Mark M Awad4. 1. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 4. Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to characterize the tumor burden dynamics on serial computed tomography scans in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab and to identify imaging markers for prolonged overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy were evaluated on serial computed tomography scans to characterize their quantitative tumor burden during therapy. Tumor burden dynamics were studied for the association with OS. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 42% (37/88), with the median tumor burden changes at the best overall response of -18.3% (range, -100.0% to +103.6%). Response rates were higher in men than in women (P = .05) and in patients with higher programmed cell death ligand-1 expression levels (P = .02). Tumor burden stayed below the baseline burden throughout therapy in 55 patients (63%). In an 8-week landmark analysis, patients with tumor burden below the baseline burden during the first 8 weeks of therapy had longer OS compared with patients who had ≥ 0% increase (median OS, 30.7 v 16.2 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; P = .01). In the extended Cox models, patients whose tumor burden stayed below the baseline burden throughout therapy had significantly reduced hazards of death (HR = 0.41, P = .003, univariate; HR = 0.35, P = .02, multivariate). Only one patient (1.1%) experienced pseudoprogression with initial tumor increase and subsequent tumor regression. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line single-agent pembrolizumab, tumor burden reduction below the baseline burden during therapy was an independent marker for prolonged OS, which may serve as a practical guide for treatment decisions.
The objectives of the study were to characterize the tumor burden dynamics on serial computed tomography scans in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab and to identify imaging markers for prolonged overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy were evaluated on serial computed tomography scans to characterize their quantitative tumor burden during therapy. Tumor burden dynamics were studied for the association with OS. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 42% (37/88), with the median tumor burden changes at the best overall response of -18.3% (range, -100.0% to +103.6%). Response rates were higher in men than in women (P = .05) and in patients with higher programmed cell death ligand-1 expression levels (P = .02). Tumor burden stayed below the baseline burden throughout therapy in 55 patients (63%). In an 8-week landmark analysis, patients with tumor burden below the baseline burden during the first 8 weeks of therapy had longer OS compared with patients who had ≥ 0% increase (median OS, 30.7 v 16.2 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; P = .01). In the extended Cox models, patients whose tumor burden stayed below the baseline burden throughout therapy had significantly reduced hazards of death (HR = 0.41, P = .003, univariate; HR = 0.35, P = .02, multivariate). Only one patient (1.1%) experienced pseudoprogression with initial tumor increase and subsequent tumor regression. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line single-agent pembrolizumab, tumor burden reduction below the baseline burden during therapy was an independent marker for prolonged OS, which may serve as a practical guide for treatment decisions.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Mizuki Nishino; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Annick D Van den Abbeele Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Scott Gettinger; Naiyer A Rizvi; Laura Q Chow; Hossein Borghaei; Julie Brahmer; Neal Ready; David E Gerber; Frances A Shepherd; Scott Antonia; Jonathan W Goldman; Rosalyn A Juergens; Scott A Laurie; Faith E Nathan; Yun Shen; Christopher T Harbison; Matthew D Hellmann Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Corey J Langer; Shirish M Gadgeel; Hossein Borghaei; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Amita Patnaik; Steven F Powell; Ryan D Gentzler; Renato G Martins; James P Stevenson; Shadia I Jalal; Amit Panwalkar; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Matthew Gubens; Lecia V Sequist; Mark M Awad; Joseph Fiore; Yang Ge; Harry Raftopoulos; Leena Gandhi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Edward B Garon; Naiyer A Rizvi; Rina Hui; Natasha Leighl; Ani S Balmanoukian; Joseph Paul Eder; Amita Patnaik; Charu Aggarwal; Matthew Gubens; Leora Horn; Enric Carcereny; Myung-Ju Ahn; Enriqueta Felip; Jong-Seok Lee; Matthew D Hellmann; Omid Hamid; Jonathan W Goldman; Jean-Charles Soria; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Ruth Z Rutledge; Jin Zhang; Jared K Lunceford; Reshma Rangwala; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Charlotte Roach; Kenneth Emancipator; Leena Gandhi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Julien Mazières; David Planchard; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Grace K Dy; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Hervé Lena; Elisa Minenza; Bertrand Mennecier; Gregory A Otterson; Luis T Campos; David R Gandara; Benjamin P Levy; Suresh G Nair; Gérard Zalcman; Jürgen Wolf; Pierre-Jean Souquet; Editta Baldini; Federico Cappuzzo; Christos Chouaid; Afshin Dowlati; Rachel Sanborn; Ariel Lopez-Chavez; Christian Grohe; Rudolf M Huber; Christopher T Harbison; Christine Baudelet; Brian J Lestini; Suresh S Ramalingam Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Tony S K Mok; Yi-Long Wu; Iveta Kudaba; Dariusz M Kowalski; Byoung Chul Cho; Hande Z Turna; Gilberto Castro; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Konstantin K Laktionov; Igor Bondarenko; Kaoru Kubota; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Jin Zhang; Debra Kush; Gilberto Lopes Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 79.321