Mamdouh A Abu-Zaied1, Galal H Elgemeie2, Nashwa M Mahmoud3. 1. Green Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth Street, Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt. 2. Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Helwan, Cairo 11795, Egypt. 3. Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Suez University, Suez 43533, Egypt.
Abstract
A class of pyrimidine thioglycoside analogs (6a-h) were synthesized from a reaction of 2-cyano-3,3-dimercapto-N-arylacrylamide (2a-d) and thiourea to produce the corresponding 4-amino-2-mercapto-N-arylpyrimidine-5-carboxamide derivatives (3a-d), and stirring of compounds (3a-d) with peracylated α-d-gluco- and galacto-pyranosyl bromides (4a,b) in DMF-sodium hydride gave the corresponding pyrimidine thioglycosides (5a-h). Deacetylation of the pyrimidine thioglycosides via a reaction with dry NH3/MeOH gave the corresponding free pyrimidine thioglycosides (6a-h). The compounds have been characterized by 13C NMR, 1H NMR, and IR. Pharmacological evaluation of compounds 3a-d, 5a-h, and 6a-h in vitro against SARS-COV-2 and Avian Influenza H5N1 virus strains revealed that some compounds possess interesting activity.
A class of pyrimidinen class="Chemical">thioglycoside analogs (6a-h) were synthesized from a reaction of 2-cyano-3,3-dimercapto-N-arylacrylamide (2a-d) and thiourea to produce the corresponding 4-amino-2-mercapto-N-arylpyrimidine-5-carboxamide derivatives (3a-d), and stirring of compounds (3a-d) with peracylated α-d-gluco- and galacto-pyranosyl bromides (4a,b) in DMF-sodium hydride gave the corresponding pyrimidine thioglycosides (5a-h). Deacetylation of the pyrimidine thioglycosides via a reaction with dry NH3/MeOH gave the corresponding free pyrimidine thioglycosides (6a-h). The compounds have been characterized by 13C NMR, 1H NMR, and IR. Pharmacological evaluation of compounds 3a-d, 5a-h, and 6a-h in vitro against SARS-COV-2 and Avian InfluenzaH5N1 virus strains revealed that some compounds possess interesting activity.
Corona
viruses n class="Chemical">are a wide group of viruses that infect many different
animals, and they have caused severe and dangerous respiratory infections
in humans.[1,2] Between 2002 and 2012, two types of corona
viruses with the animal origin, severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus
(MERS-CoV), arose in humans and caused deadly respiratory infection,
making emerging corona viruses a source of upcoming and new public
health concern in the world during this century.[3] On December 31, 2019, the World Health Organization announced
the emergence of a new corona virus called SARS-CoV-2 in the city
of Wuhan, China, and this virus has caused an outbreak of viral pneumonia
that is rapidly contagious and spreads among humans all over the world
leading to death.[4,5] The new corona virus disease is
also known as corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has tremendously
surpassed SARS and MERS in terms of the number of infectedpeoples
and the number of areas of the epidemic.[6] The continuing and rapid spread of COVID-19 has now become a serious
threat to human health in this world. It has become imperative for
the researchers in the field of medicinal chemistry to develop strategic
research plans in order to produce medicines to combat these corona
viruses. Clearly, no antiviral drugs are approved for treatment of
corona viruses. Accordingly, corona viruses have been given importance
status by governments for development of avoidance and management
strategies due to harshness of these infections and sound epidemic
potential.[7−9] Recently, many research and scientific projects focus
on trials to development of antiviral nucleoside analogues targeting
viral ribonucleic acid synthesis as effective therapeutics against
covid-19 virus infections. Nevertheless, the recent development of
nucleotide and nucleoside analogue inhibitors with a broad-spectrum
activity against multiple covid-19 and a high barrier for resistance
holds promise for the treatment of covid-19 disease.[10−13]
Nucleoside analogue inhibitors, currently used to treat vn class="Gene">iral
infections,
are chemically synthesized analogues of purines and pyrimidines in
which the sugar moiety or heterocyclic ring has been altered.[14−16] Nucleoside analogues are managed as prodrugs, which are metabolized
by host or viral kinases to their active triphosphate once inside
the cell. Nucleoside analogues exert inhibitory effects on viral replication
by one or more mechanisms. Through these mechanisms, nucleoside analogues
alter the genetic character of the virus, leading to a decrease in
viral qualification with every successive replication cycle. Finally,
nucleoside analogues could potentially serve as broad-spectrum inhibitors
of Covid-19infection.[17] Several antiviral
nucleoside and nucleotide analogues reported in the literature, which
are used as antiviral drugs, effective with SARS-CoV-2are shown in
(Figure ). The drugs
Remdesivir and Avigan have recently been permitted for use in the
treatment of infections from the corona virus pandemic.[18,19]
Figure 1
Nucleoside
analogues with demonstrated activity against Covid-19.
Nucleoside
analogues with demonstrated activity against Covid-19.The covid-19 and influenza virusH5N1 have matching symptoms.
They
origin diseases that disturb the breathing system, which may lead
to death. Both viruses spread from one person to another through contact.In our recent work, we have synthesized many antiviral heterocyclic
n class="Chemical">thioglycosides, such as purinethioglycosides,[20,21] pyrimidine thioglycosides,[22,23] pyridine thioglycosides,[24,25] quinolone thioglycosides,[26] triazole
thioglycosides,[27] thiazole thioglycosides,[28] oxadiazole thioglycosides,[29] imidazole thioglycosides,[30] pyrazolethioglycosides,[31] and thienopyrazole thioglycosides,[32] which exhibited active cytotoxicity, and also
we described that dihydropyridine thioglycosidesare used as inhibitors
in the protein glycosylation process.[33,34]
The
main purpose of this work is to synthesize a number of novel
n class="Chemical">pyrimidine thioglycosides as pyrimidinenucleoside analogues, which
showed an interesting result toward Covid-19 and H5N1 virus strains.
This synthesis is accomplished through the reaction of 2-cyano-3,3-dimercapto-N-aryl
acrylamide and thiourea, followed by coupling of the resulting pyrimidines
with α-halogeno sugars.
Results and Discussion
The synthesis of our desired n class="Chemical">thiopyrimidine derivatives achieved
using a mixture of 2-cyano-3,3-dimercapto-N-arylacrylamide
(2a–d) and thiourea in absolute ethanol containing
drops of piperidine provided thiopyrimidine derivatives (3a–d) in high yields as the sole product (Scheme ). The structures of compounds (3a–d) have been confirmed by using spectral and chemical measurements.
Thus, the 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3a showed
the absence of a cyano group, which was detected in parent 2, and the emergence of a signal at 6.86 ppm was attributed to an
NH2 group. The coupling between the aglycon (3a-d) and activated sugars was achieved in the presence of a basic medium
at room temperature to give in a good yield the corresponding pyrimidine S-glycosides (5a–h) (Scheme ). It has been proposed that
the cis-(α) sugars interact via a simple SN2 reaction
to give the β-glycoside products.[35] Structures of (5a–h) were confirmed based on
the spectral data (13C NMR, 1H NMR, and IR).
For example, the 1H NMR spectrum of 5a showed
the anomeric proton as a doublet at δ = 4.96 ppm with a spin–spin
coupling constant (J = 9.8 Hz) demonstrating the β-configuration.
The other six protons of glucose were resonated at δ 3.97–4.9
6 ppm, when thioglycosides (5a–h) were reacted
with NH3–MeOH at room temperature for 10 min. The
deprotected derivatives (6a–h) were obtained in
good yields (Scheme ). The structures were confirmed based on the spectral data and elemental
analysis. Thus, the 1H NMR spectrum of 6a showed
the anomeric proton as a doublet at δ 4.62 ppm with a spin–spin
coupling constant (J = 9.4 Hz), signifying only a β-d-configuration and also proved by the 13C NMR spectrum,
which exhibited a signal at δ 83.25 ppm corresponding to C-1′.
The signals at δ 61.82, 80.14, 69.54, 78.11, and 75.12 ppm correspond
to C-6′, C-5′, C-4′, C-3′, and C-2′.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Pyrimidine Thioglycoside Derivatives 5a–h
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Free Pyrimidine Thioglycoside
Derivatives 6a–h
Antiviral Activity
H5N1 Influenza Virus
Antiviral activity
of the synthesized compounds was evaluated with respect to n class="Species">H5N1 influenza
virus strain A/Egypt/M7217B/2013 utilizing 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,
5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cytotoxicity (TC50)
and Plaque reduction assays exploring inhibition and cytotoxicity
percentage values. The accumulated data for inhibition activities
and cytotoxicity (see Table and Figures , 3) indicated that most of the compounds
demonstrated dose-dependent inhibition behavior.
Table 1
Activity of Tested Compounds (3a–d, 5a–h, and 6a–h) against H5N1 Virus Measured Using the Plaque Reduction Assay
comp. no.
concentration
(μM)
initial viral count
viral count PFU/mL
inhibition %
comp. no.
concentration (μM)
initial viral
count
viral count PFU/mL
inhibition %
3a
0.125
3.1 × 106
6 × 106
48.33
5g
0.125
3.4 × 106
6 × 106
43.33
0.25
3.8 × 106
6 × 106
36.67
0.25
2.5 × 106
6 × 106
58.33
3b
0.125
6.0 × 106
6 × 106
0.00
5h
0.125
3.0 × 106
6 × 106
50.00
0.25
3.0 × 106
6 × 106
50.00
0.25
3.2 × 106
6 × 106
46.67
3c
0.125
3.4 × 106
6 × 106
43.33
6a
0.125
2.3 × 106
6 × 106
61.67
0.25
4.0 × 106
6 × 106
33.33
0.25
2.5 × 106
6 × 106
58.33
3d
0.125
3.0 × 106
6 × 106
50.00
6b
0.125
3.3 × 106
6 × 106
45.67
0.25
3.2 × 106
6 × 106
46.67
0.25
3.0 × 106
6 × 106
50.00
5a
0.125
2.5 × 106
6 × 106
58.33
6c
0.125
3.4 × 106
6 × 106
56.33
0.25
2.3 × 106
6 × 106
61.67
0.25
3.2 × 106
6 × 106
63.67
5b
0.125
3.1 × 106
6 × 106
48.33
6d
0.125
4.0 × 106
6 × 106
61.33
0.25
1.3 × 106
6 × 106
63.67
0.25
2.4 × 106
6 × 106
60.00
5c
0.125
3.4 × 106
6 × 106
43.33
6e
0.125
2.0 × 106
6 × 106
71.67
0.25
2.5 × 106
6 × 106
58.33
0.25
2.2 × 106
6 × 106
78.33
5d
0.125
4.0 × 106
6 × 106
33.33
6f
0.125
3.5 × 106
6 × 106
66.67
0.25
3.40 × 106
6 × 106
43.33
0.25
2.5 × 106
6 × 106
83.33
5e
0.125
3.0 × 106
6 × 106
50.00
6g
0.125
3.6 × 106
6 × 106
65.67
0.25
2.0 × 106
6 × 106
66.67
0.25
1.3 × 106
6 × 106
63.33
5f
0.125
2.9 × 106
6 × 106
51.67
6h
0.125
3.4 × 106
6 × 106
41.67
0.25
1.3 × 106
6 × 106
63.33
0.25
1.0 × 106
6 × 106
58.33
Figure 2
Cytotoxicity of compounds 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g, and 5h at concentrations
of 0.25 and 0.125 μM.
Figure 3
Cytotoxicity
of compounds 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e, 6f, 6g,
and 6h at concentrations of 0.25 and 0.125 μM.
Cytotoxicity of compounds 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g, and 5h at concentrations
of 0.25 and 0.125 μM.Cytotoxicity
of compounds 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e, 6f, 6g,
and 6h at concentrations of 0.25 and 0.125 μM.All tested compounds exhibited the highest
to moderate and low
potency activity toward n class="Species">H5N1 virus. Attachment of sugar moieties,
especially deprotected sugars, to the substituted N-aryl pyrimidine
derivatives (compounds 6a–h) demonstrated higher
inhibition activity than protected sugar (compounds 5a–h) against H5N1 virus, while pyrimidine derivative-incorporated galacto
compounds 5e–h and 6e–h showed
higher inhibition activity than its gluco analogues (compounds 5a–d, 6a–d). Most active compounds tested in
this study contained N-(phenyl and 4-chlorophenyl
moiety pyrimidine), while compounds possessing methyl and methoxyphenyl
rings exhibited moderate antiviral activity. On the other hand, pyrimidine
4-merapto derivatives (compounds 3a–d) demonstrated
low anti-H5N1 activity.
SARS-COV-2
A series
of newly synthesized
(twenty) compounds were screened and evaluated for then class="Gene">ir antiviral
activity against SARS-COV-2 virus to estimate the half-maximal cytotoxic
concentration (CC50) and inhibitory concentration 50(IC50), see (Table and Figures , 5). The results of the MTT assay revealed that some
of these compounds have potent activity against SARS-CoV-2 ranging
from high, moderate, and low antiviral activity.
Table 2
Determination of the Antiviral CC50 and
IC50 and SI of Nontoxic Doses of Compounds
(3a–d, 5a–h, and 6a–h) against SARS-COV-2 VIRUS
compound no.
CC50 (μmol)
IC50 (μmol)
SI
3a
510.5
341.3
1.50
3b
503.8
288.7
1.75
3c
204.1
IC50 > CC50
3d
356.0
IC50 > CC50
5a
356.1
126.1
2.80
5b
349.7
151.6
2.30
5c
432.6
287.7
1.50
5d
428.9
168.7
2.54
5e
344.9
86.02
4.00
5f
467.0
77.37
6.04
5g
483.2
106.3
4.55
5h
303.0
92.62
3.27
6a
415.0
47.77
8.69
6b
314.2
45.30
6.90
6c
434.1
73.66
5.89
6d
468.2
49.84
9.39
6e
467.9
18.47
25.33
6f
360.9
15.41
23.40
6g
416.4
34.05
12.22
6h
180.2
30.34
5.90
Figure 4
Graphs of inhibitory
concentration 50 (IC50) of tested
compounds (3a–d, 5a–h, and 6a–h): antiviral activity against severe acute respiratory
syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (hCoV19/Egypt/NRC-03/2020, Accession
Number on GSAID: EPI_ISL_430820).
Figure 5
Graphs
of cytotoxicity concentration 50 (CC50) of tested
compounds (3a–d, 5a–h, and 6a–h): on Vero E6 cells.
Graphs of inhibitory
concentration 50 (IC50) of tested
compounds (3a–d, 5a–h, and n class="Chemical">6a–h): antiviral activity against severe acute respiratory
syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (hCoV19/Egypt/NRC-03/2020, Accession
Number on GSAID: EPI_ISL_430820).
Graphs
of cytotoxicity concentration 50 (CC50) of tested
compounds (3a–d, 5a–h, and 6a–h): on Vero E6 cells.Interestingly, the
compounds with n class="Chemical">glycosyl moieties incorporated
into the pyrimidine ring system through S-glycosidic linkage (5a–h and 6a–h) demonstrated a marked
increase in inhibition activity of SARS-COV-2 virus compared to compounds
without these moieties. Moreover, the activity observed for the substituted
pyrimidine thioglycosides (6a–h) indicated the
importance of the free hydroxyl groups of S-glycopyranosyl
moieties for increasing activity compared with protected S-glycopyranosyl moieties (5a–h). In addition,
the deprotected galactopyranosyl pyrimidine derivatives (6e–h) showed higher activity than the corresponding glucopyranosyl pyrimidines
(6a–d). The inhibition assay results revealed
the compounds N-phenyl pyrimidine thiogalactoside
(6e), N-P-chlorophenyl pyrimidine thiogalactoside
(6f), and N-4-methoxyphenyl pyrimidine
thiogalactoside 6h as the moderate potent derivatives
with CC50 and IC50 values of 467.9, 360.9, and
180.2 and 18.47, 15.41, 30.34 μM, respectively, and selectivity
index values of 25.33, 23.40, and 5.90, respectively, while compounds
with methyl and methoxy substitution at the N-p-phenyl
ring exhibited a low inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2, therefore,
the present study confirmed the activities of some of the tested compounds
especially (6e) and (6f) as potent inhibitors
against COVID-19. These compounds are recommended to be further tested
against COVID-19. They may be tested either alone or in combination.
Structure–Activity Relationships
The
antiviral activity of compounds 3a–d, n class="Chemical">5a–h, and 6a–h against H5N1 and
SARS-COV-2 viruses was investigated and the results are shown in Tables and 2, and compounds 3a–d showed weak activity
toward H5N1 and SARS-COV-2 viruses. On the other hand, compounds 5e (X = H) and 5f (X = Cl) shown in Figure exhibited some remarkable
activity against H5N1 with inhibition 50 and 51.67% at a concentration
of 0.125, also they exhibited inhibition of 66.67% and 63.33 at 0.25
μmol, respectively. Also, similar results were found for compounds 5e and 5f against SARS-COV-2 with IC50 = 86.02 and 77.37 μmol. In a series of compounds 6a–h, the antiviral activity against H5N1virus
was improved as noticed in compound 6e (X = H) with inhibition
of 71.67 at 0.125 and 78.33 at 0.25 μmol, while compound 6f exhibited good potency among the tested compounds toward
H5N1 with 66.67 and 83.33% at 0.125 and 0.25 μmol, respectively.
Additionally, the same results were observed for 6e and 6f against SARS-COV-2, with IC50 = 18.47 and 15.41
μmol. Thus, it was concluded that the compounds 6e and 6f showed moderate activity against the two types
of tested viruses among the other tested compounds (Figure ).
Figure 6
Antiviral activity of
newly prepared compounds against H5N1 and
SARA-CoV-2.
Antiviral activity of
newly prepared compounds against H5N1 and
SARA-CoV-2.
Molecular Docking Study
The most potent antiviral compounds n class="Chemical">6e and 6f were docked with the crystal structure of Influenza A VirusH5N1
Nucleoprotein (PDB: 2Q06) and the crystal structure of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from
SARS-CoV-2 (PDB: 7BV2) using molecular docking program soft war 2015.10 to know the exact
binding pattern with the receptor. From this study, it was noticed
that the docked compounds 6e and 6f with
the active site of 2Q06 showed good binding energy in the range between
−4.5829 and −4.9411 Kcal mol–1 and
displayed good fitness with the active site of 2Q06 protein (Tables and 4). Thus, compound 6e exhibited two hydrogen bonds
between two hydroxyl groups and amino acid residues Glu 339 and Ala
387, with bond lengths 2.88 and 2.82 Å, respectively (Figures , 8). Compound 6f has two hydrogen bonds, one with
a bond length of 2.97 Å between the hydroxyl group of the sugar
moiety and amino acid residue Gly 435 and the other between the NH2 group and Ser 438 with a bond length of 3.08 Å along
with bond between chlorine atom and Arg 446 with a bond length of
3.36 Å. Also, it has a cation interaction between the pyrimidine
ring and Asp 439 (Figures , 10). On the other hand compounds 6e and 6f have affinity to bind with the active
site of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from SARS-CoV-2 (PDB: 7BV2), thus compound 6e exhibited binding energy S = −5.0696
Kcal mol–1 and exhibited three hydrogen bonds with
bond lengths equal to 3.14, 4.06, and 3.73 Å for hydroxyl and
thiocarbonyl groups, with the amino acid residues ACH544, Asn 496, and Asn 497, respectively (Figure , 12). Additionally,
compound 6f showed the most potent inhibitory activity
against SARS-CoV-2 among the other prepared series with three hydrogen
bonds, one between the hydroxyl group and ASpA85 with a bond length
of 2.91 Å and the other two between the C=S group and Lys A545
and Tyr A546 with bond lengths 3.41 Å and 3.30, along with bond
interaction between chlorine and UC12 with S = −5.6214
Kcal mol–1 (Figure , 14).
Table 3
Interactions of Compounds 6e and 6f with the Active Site of 2Q06
compd. no.
B. E. (S)Kcal/mol
interaction groups
interaction amino acids
length of hydrogen bonds Å
6e
–4.5829
OH
Glu 339
2.88 Å
OH
Ala 387
2.82 Å
NH2
His 272
cation
6f
–4.9411
OH
Gly 435
2.97 Å
NH2
Ser 438
3.08 Å
Cl
Arg 446
3.36 Å
Pyrimidine
Asp 439
cation
Table 4
Interactions of Compounds 6e and 6f with the Active Site of 7BV2
compd. no.
B. E. (S)Kcal/mol
interaction groups
interaction amino acids
length of hydrogen bonds Å
6e
–5.0696
OH
ACH
3.14
C=S
Asn A496 Asn A497
4.06
C=S
3.73
6f
–5.6214
OH
Asp A845 Lys
A545
2.91
C=S
Tyr
A546
3.41
C=S
UC12
3.30
Cl
3.44
Figure 7
Interaction of 6e (2D) with the active site of 2Q06.
Figure 8
Interaction
of 6e (3D) with the active site of 2Q06.
Figure 9
Interaction of 6f (2D) with the active site of 2Q06.
Figure 10
Interaction of 6f (3D) with the active site
of 2Q06.
Figure 11
Interaction of 6e (2D) with
the active site of 7BV2.
Figure 12
Interaction of 6e (3D) with the active site of 7BV2.
Figure 13
Interaction
of 6f (2D) with the active site of 7BV2.
Figure 14
Interaction of 6f (3D) with the active site of 7BV2.
Interaction of 6e (2D) with the active site of 2Q06.Interaction
of 6e (3D) with the active site of 2Q06.Interaction of 6f (2D) with the active site of 2Q06.Interaction of 6f (3D) with the active site
of 2Q06.Interaction of 6e (2D) with
the active site of 7BV2.Interaction of 6e (3D) with the active site of 7BV2.Interaction
of 6f (2D) with the active site of 7BV2.Interaction of 6f (3D) with the active site of 7BV2.
Conclusions
In this
paper, a new and innovative method has been successfully
developed for synthesizing new and important derivatives of n class="Chemical">pyrimidinethiol
compounds and their corresponding thioglycoside derivatives. This
method has been proven to be effective in preparing many analogue
components of nucleic acids, which are of medical importance in the
field of therapeutic chemistry. This method has been proven to be
important in the field of industrial chemistry due to the fact that
our pyrimidine thioglycosidesare prepared at room temperature with
high purity and high reaction yield, and therefore it is considered
a more efficient method than many methods used to obtain similar compounds.
Some novel glycosides such as 6e, 6f, and 6h showed moderate anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity at noncytotoxic
micromolar concentrations in vitro with a significant selectivity
index (CC50/IC50 = 6–25).
Experimental Part
All melting points were measured on an
Electrothermal 9100 digital
melting point apparatus. The n class="Chemical">1H NMR and 13C
NMR spectra were measured on a JEOL-500MHz spectrometer in DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 using Si(CH3)4 as an internal standard at the National Research Center,
Cairo, Egypt. Potential cytotoxicity assay of the newly synthesized
compounds was evaluated at the Center of Scientific Excellence for
Influenza Viruses, Environmental Research Division, National Research
Center (NRC), Dokki, Cairo 12622, Egypt. Elemental analyses were carried
out at the Microanalytical Unit, Faculty of Science, Cairo University,
Cairo, Egypt.
Progress of the reactions was monitored by thin-layer
chromatography
(TLC) using aluminum sheets coated with n class="Chemical">silica gel F254 plates with a layer thickness of 0.25 nm (Merck). By viewing under
a short-wavelength UV lamp, effective detection can be achieved. Compounds
(1a–d and 2a–d) were prepared
following our reported procedures.[36,37]
General Procedure for the Synthesis of (3a–d)
To a solution of 2-cyano-3,3-dimercapto-N-phenylacrylamide 2a–d (10 mmol) in absolute ethanol (10 n class="Gene">mL) was added
piperidine (2 drops) and stirred, then a solution of thiourea in ethanol
(10 mmol) was dropped within 30 min. Stirring was continued under
refluxing conditions for 2 h. After completion, the reaction mixture
was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was poured on
ice-water, collected by filtration, dried, and recrystallized from
ethanol to give compounds 3a–d.
To a solution of 3a–d (10 mmol) in
dry DMF (20 mL), NaH (15 mmol) was added portion wise
for 15 min and the solution was stirred at room temperature for another
30 min. Then, a solution of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-α-d-gluco- or galactopyronosyl bromide 4a,b in DMF (10 mmol) was dropped within 30 min
and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until complete
mixing was achieved (TLC, 8 h). After that, the reaction mixture was
poured into ice water and the resulting precipitate was collected
by filtration, dried, and recrystallized from an appropriate solvent
system to give compounds 5a–h.
Dry gaseous ammonia
was passed through
a solution of protected nucleoside5a–h (10 mmol) in dry methanol (20 mL) for 10 min with cooling at 0 °C
and stirring, then the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
until the reaction was judged complete by TLC using (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1) (Rf, 0.54–0.56). The resulting mixture was concentrated
under reduced pressure to afford a solid residue, which was washed
several times by boiling chloroform. The residue was dried, purified
by column chromatography using chloroform/methanol (9:1), and crystallized
using an appropriate solvent to give corresponding compounds 6a-h.
Antiviral
activity assay and n class="Chemical">MTT cytotoxicity assay (TC50): samples were 10-fold
serially diluted with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium
(DMEM). Stock solutions of the test compounds were prepared in 10%
DMSO in d.d H2O. The cytotoxic activity of the extracts
was tested in Madin Darby Canine kidney (MDCK) cells by using the
MTT method (Mossman, 1983)[38] with a minor
modification. Briefly, the cells were seeded in 96-well plates (100
μL/well at a density of 3 × 105 cells/mL) and
incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in 5%CO2. After 24 h,
cells were treated with various concentrations of the tested compounds
in triplicate. After further 24 h, the supernatant was discarded and
cell monolayers were washed with sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS)
three times and MTT solution (20 μL of 5 mg/mL stock solution)
was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h, followed
by medium aspiration. In each well, the formed formazan crystals were
dissolved with 200 μL of acidified isopropanol (0.04 M HCl in
absolute isopropanol = 0.073 mLHCL in 50 mLisopropanol). Absorbance
of formazan solutions was measured at λmax 540 nm
with 620 nm as a reference wavelength using a multiwell plate reader.
Percentage of cytotoxicity compared to the untreated cells was determined.
The plot of % cytotoxicity versus sample concentration was used to
calculate the concentration, which was found to be 50% cytotoxicity
(LD50).
Plaque Reduction Assay
Assay was
carried out according to the method of Hayden et al. 1980[39] in a six-well plate. n class="CellLine">MDCK cells
(105 cells/mL) were cultivated for 24 h at 37 °C.
A/CHICKEN/7217B/1/2013 (H5N1) virus was diluted to give 105PFU/well and mixed with the safe concentration of the tested compounds
and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C before being added to the cells.
Growth medium was removed from the cell culture plates and virus-Cpd
or virus-extract and Virus-oseltamivir mixtures were inoculated (100
μL/well), after 1 h contact time for virus adsorption, 3 mL
of DMEM supplemented with 2% agarose was added onto the cell monolayer,
and plates were left to solidify and incubated at 37 °C till
formation of viral plaques (3–4 days). Formalin (10%) was added
for 2 h and plates were stained with 0.1% crystal violet in distilled
water. Control wells were included, where untreated virus was incubated
with MDCK cells and finally plaques were counted and percentage reduction
in plaque formation in comparison to control wells was recorded.
SARS-COV2
MTT Cytotoxicity Assay
To estimate
the half-maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50), we dissolved
stock solutions of the tested compounds in DMSO 10% aqueous solution
and diluted further to the working solutions with n class="Chemical">DMEM. We tested
the cytotoxic activity by applying the MTT method with minor modifications
in VERO-E6 cells. Briefly, we seeded the cells in 96-well plates and
the cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24
h. After that, the cells were treated with different concentrations
of the tested compounds in triplicate. Then, we completed the total
methodology as previously mentioned in detail.[38] 50% cytotoxicity (TC50) was calculated by plotting
the cytotoxicity percentage versus sample concentration.[39]
Inhibitory Concentration
50 (IC50) Determination
We determined The IC50 concentrations
as previously described.[40] Briefly, in
96-well tissue culture plates, we distributed 2.4 × 104 Vero-E6 cells in each well and we incubated the plates overnight
at a humidified 37 °C incubator under 5% n class="Chemical">CO2 condition.
Then, we washed the cell monolayers once with 1× PBS and we subjected
it to virus adsorption for 1 h at room temperature. The cell monolayers
were further overlaid with 50 μL of DMEM containing varying
concentrations of the test ARBs. After incubation for 72 h, we fixed
the cells for 20 min using 100 μL of 4% paraformaldehyde and
we stained the cells using 0.1% crystal violet in distilled water
for 15 min at room temperature. Then, we dissolved the crystal violet
dye using 100 μL absolute methanol per well and the optical
density of the color was measured using an Anthos Zenyth 200rt plate
reader at 570 nm. The IC50 of the compound is a value that
is required to decrease the virus-induced cytopathic effect (CPE)
by 50%, compared to the virus control.
Authors: Yousuke Furuta; Brian B Gowen; Kazumi Takahashi; Kimiyasu Shiraki; Donald F Smee; Dale L Barnard Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2013-09-29 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Shahenda Mahgoub; Samar S Fatahala; Amira I Sayed; Hanaa B Atya; Mohamed F El-Shehry; Hala Afifi; Samir M Awad; Rania H Abd El-Hameed; Heba Taha Journal: Bioorg Chem Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 5.307