Literature DB >> 34250198

Landmark-free morphometric analysis of knee osteoarthritis using joint statistical models of bone shape and articular space variability.

Nicolas Charon1, Asef Islam2, Wojciech Zbijewski2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative disease involving a variety of structural changes in the affected joint. In addition to narrowing of the articular space, recent studies involving statistical shape analysis methods have suggested that specific bone shapes might be associated with the disease. We aim to investigate the feasibility of using the recently introduced framework of functional shapes (Fshape) to extract morphological features of OA that combine shape variability of articular surfaces of the tibia (or femur) together with the changes of the joint space. Approach: Our study uses a dataset of three-dimensional cone-beam CT volumes of 17 knees without OA and 17 knees with OA. Each knee is then represented as an object (Fshape) consisting of a triangulated tibial (or femoral) articular surface and a map of joint space widths (JSWs) measured at the points of this surface (joint space map, JSM). We introduce a generative atlas model to estimate a template (mean) Fshape of the sample population together with template-centered variables that model the transformations from the template to each subject. This approach has two potential advantages compared with other statistical shape modeling methods that have been investigated in knee OA: (i) Fshapes simultaneously consider the variability in bone shape and JSW, and (ii) Fshape atlas estimation is based on a diffeomorphic transformation model of surfaces that does not require a priori landmark correspondences between the subjects. The estimated atlas-to-subject Fshape transformations were used as input to principal component analysis dimensionality reduction combined with a linear support vector machine (SVM) classifier to identify the morphological features of OA.
Results: Using tibial articular surface as the shape component of the Fshape, we found leave-one-out cross validation scores of ≈ 91.18 % for the classification based on the bone surface transformations alone, ≈ 91.18 % for the classification based on the residual JSM, and ≈ 85.29 % for the classification using both Fshape components. Similar results were obtained using femoral articular surfaces. The discriminant directions identified in the statistical analysis were associated with medial narrowing of the joint space, steeper intercondylar eminence, and relative deepening of the medial tibial plateau. Conclusions: The proposed approach provides an integrated framework for combined statistical analysis of shape and JSPs. It can successfully extract features correlated to OA that appear consistent with previous studies in the field. Although future large-scale study is necessary to confirm the significance of these findings, our results suggest that the functional shape methodology is a promising new tool for morphological analysis of OA and orthopedics data in general.
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational anatomy; computed tomography; functional shapes; joint space maps; orthopedics; osteoarthritis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34250198      PMCID: PMC8257000          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.4.044001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  30 in total

1.  Three-dimensional mapping of cortical thickness using Laplace's equation.

Authors:  S E Jones; B R Buchbinder; I Aharon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  An Eulerian PDE approach for computing tissue thickness.

Authors:  Anthony J Yezzi; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  A review of feature reduction techniques in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Benson Mwangi; Tian Siva Tian; Jair C Soares
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-04

4.  Longitudinal validation of periarticular bone area and 3D shape as biomarkers for knee OA progression? Data from the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium.

Authors:  David Hunter; Michael Nevitt; John Lynch; Virginia Byers Kraus; Jeffrey N Katz; Jamie E Collins; Mike Bowes; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Elena Losina
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Robust statistical shape models for MRI bone segmentation in presence of small field of view.

Authors:  Jérôme Schmid; Jinman Kim; Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Characterization of 3D joint space morphology using an electrostatic model (with application to osteoarthritis).

Authors:  Qian Cao; Gaurav Thawait; Grace J Gang; Wojciech Zbijewski; Thomas Reigel; Tyler Brown; Brian Corner; Shadpour Demehri; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A bayesian generative model for surface template estimation.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Michael I Miller; Laurent Younes
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-09-20

Review 8.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  Three-dimensional MRI-based statistical shape model and application to a cohort of knees with acute ACL injury.

Authors:  V Pedoia; D A Lansdown; M Zaid; C E McCulloch; R Souza; C B Ma; X Li
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Depth relationships and measures of tissue thickness in dorsal midbrain.

Authors:  Paulina Truong; Jung Hwan Kim; Ricky Savjani; Kevin R Sitek; Gisela E Hagberg; Klaus Scheffler; David Ress
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.