| Literature DB >> 34250102 |
Sunil Kumar Doddaiah1, Praveen Kulkarni1, Aparna Mohandas1, M R Narayana Murthy1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government of India announced lockdown from March 25, 2020, which included measures such as social distancing, canceling mass gatherings, and closure of schools and colleges. Since the present generation of students spends a lot of time on social media, especially WhatsApp, the utility of the same to discuss the various public health domains of COVID-19 through multiple-choice questions (MCQs) was explored.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; WhatsApp; multiple-choice question; self-directed learning
Year: 2021 PMID: 34250102 PMCID: PMC8249983 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_609_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Distribution of participants based on the demographic details and the platform suggested for discussing multiple-choice questions (n=154)
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 68 (44) |
| Female | 86 (56) |
| Designation | |
| Undergraduate | 74 (48) |
| Intern | 16 (10.4) |
| Postgraduate | 47 (30.6) |
| Teaching faculty | 17 (11) |
| State-wise distribution of participant | |
| Karnataka | 98 (63.7) |
| Kerala | 14 (9.2) |
| Tamil Nadu | 9 (5.8) |
| Andhra Pradesh | 1 (0.6) |
| Uttar Pradesh | 10 (6.5) |
| New Delhi | 9 (5.8) |
| Gujarat | 1 (0.6) |
| Rajasthan | 3 (2) |
| Haryana | 5 (3.2) |
| Jharkhand | 1 (0.6) |
| Telangana | 2 (1.4) |
| West Bengal | 1 (0.6) |
| Suggested platform for discussing MCQs | |
| WhatsApp status | 59 (38.3%) |
| WhatsApp group | 86 (55.8) |
| Telegram | 6 (3.9%) |
| Webex | 3 (2) |
MCQ=Multiple-choice questions
Figure 1Geo-spatial distribution of participants; n = 154
Feedback given by the participants (n=154)
| Item | Strongly agree (%) | Agree (%) | Neutral (%) | Disagree (%) | Strongly disagree (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WhatsApp can be used as a platform to study MCQs | 66 (42.8) | 71 (46.3) | 15 (9.7) | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.6) |
| WhatsApp status of MCQs enhanced my preparation for entrance examinations | 39 (25.3) | 82 (53.3) | 31 (20.1) | 2 (1.3) | 0 |
| MCQs improved my analytical skills | 52 (33.8) | 85 (55.2) | 17 (11) | 0 | 0 |
| They helped me in self-directed learning | 53 (34.5) | 90 (58.4) | 10 (6.5) | 1 (0.6) | 0 |
| They helped me to enhance my ability to retrieve and utilize the information | 55 (35.8) | 86 (55.8) | 12 (7.8) | 1 (0.6) | 0 |
| It increased my motivation to learn | 57 (37) | 80 (51.9) | 14 (9.1) | 3 (2) | 0 |
| It encouraged collaborative learning and participation | 55 (35.7) | 83 (53.9) | 14 (9.1) | 2 (1.3) | 0 |
| I got an update about the disease in a structured manner | 65 (42.2) | 74 (48.1) | 15 (9.7) | 0 | 0 |
| The knowledge gained through this approach has enhanced my confidence to face entrance examinations | 44 (28.5) | 83 (54) | 24 (15.5) | 3 (2) | 0 |
| These questions made me visit resources other than textbooks to gain additional information | 38 (24.7) | 98 (63.6) | 16 (10.4) | 2 (1.3) | 0 |
| I used to curiously wait for what questions will be posted for the day | 43 (27.9) | 81 (52.6) | 24 (15.6) | 6 (3.9) | 0 |
| Moderator could solve the doubts as and when I approach | 54 (35) | 83 (54) | 16 (10.4) | 1 (0.6) | 0 |
| The answers to the questions were logical | 52 (33.8) | 95 (61.6) | 3 (2) | 1 (0.6) | 3 (2) |
MCQ=Multiple-choice questions
Figure 2Feedback of participants if they suggest similar activities in the future; n = 154