Literature DB >> 34248255

Variable selection with Group LASSO approach: Application to Cox regression with frailty model.

Jean Claude Utazirubanda1, Tomas Leon2, Papa Ngom1.   

Abstract

In analysis of survival outcomes supplemented with both clinical information and high-dimensional gene expression data, use of the traditional Cox proportional hazards model fails to meet some emerging needs in biomedical research. First, the number of covariates is generally much larger the sample size. Secondly, predicting an outcome based on individual gene expression is inadequate because multiple biological processes and functional pathways regulate phenotypic expression. Another challenge is that the Cox model assumes that populations are homogenous, implying that all individuals have the same risk of death, which is rarely true due to unmeasured risk factors among populations. In this paper we propose group LASSO with gamma-distributed frailty for variable selection in Cox regression by extending previous scholarship to account for heterogeneity among group structures related to exposure and susceptibility. The consistency property of the proposed method is established. This method is appropriate for addressing a wide variety of research questions from genetics to air pollution. Simulated and real world data analysis shows promising performance by group LASSO compared with other methods, including group SCAD and group MCP. Future research directions include expanding the use of frailty with adaptive group LASSO and sparse group LASSO methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frailty model; Profile likelihood; Survival analysis; group LASSO

Year:  2018        PMID: 34248255      PMCID: PMC8261624          DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2019.1571605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput        ISSN: 0361-0918            Impact factor:   1.118


  13 in total

1.  The generalized LASSO.

Authors:  Volker Roth
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2004-01

2.  Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  High-dimensional variable selection and prediction under competing risks with application to SEER-Medicare linked data.

Authors:  Jiayi Hou; Anthony Paravati; Jue Hou; Ronghui Xu; James Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comparison of variable selection methods for high-dimensional survival data with competing events.

Authors:  Julia Gilhodes; Christophe Zemmour; Soufiane Ajana; Alejandra Martinez; Jean-Pierre Delord; Eve Leconte; Jean-Marie Boher; Thomas Filleron
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Penalized likelihood in Cox regression.

Authors:  P J Verweij; H C Van Houwelingen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Dec 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Tumour invasion and metastasis initiated by microRNA-10b in breast cancer.

Authors:  Li Ma; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Andreas Rosenwald; George Wright; Wing C Chan; Joseph M Connors; Elias Campo; Richard I Fisher; Randy D Gascoyne; H Konrad Muller-Hermelink; Erlend B Smeland; Jena M Giltnane; Elaine M Hurt; Hong Zhao; Lauren Averett; Liming Yang; Wyndham H Wilson; Elaine S Jaffe; Richard Simon; Richard D Klausner; John Powell; Patricia L Duffey; Dan L Longo; Timothy C Greiner; Dennis D Weisenburger; Warren G Sanger; Bhavana J Dave; James C Lynch; Julie Vose; James O Armitage; Emilio Montserrat; Armando López-Guillermo; Thomas M Grogan; Thomas P Miller; Michel LeBlanc; German Ott; Stein Kvaloy; Jan Delabie; Harald Holte; Peter Krajci; Trond Stokke; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  VARIABLE SELECTION AND ESTIMATION IN HIGH-DIMENSIONAL VARYING-COEFFICIENT MODELS.

Authors:  Fengrong Wei; Jian Huang; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.261

9.  Prediction accuracy and variable selection for penalized cause-specific hazards models.

Authors:  Maral Saadati; Jan Beyersmann; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Axel Benner
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.207

10.  Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  G Lenz; G Wright; S S Dave; W Xiao; J Powell; H Zhao; W Xu; B Tan; N Goldschmidt; J Iqbal; J Vose; M Bast; K Fu; D D Weisenburger; T C Greiner; J O Armitage; A Kyle; L May; R D Gascoyne; J M Connors; G Troen; H Holte; S Kvaloy; D Dierickx; G Verhoef; J Delabie; E B Smeland; P Jares; A Martinez; A Lopez-Guillermo; E Montserrat; E Campo; R M Braziel; T P Miller; L M Rimsza; J R Cook; B Pohlman; J Sweetenham; R R Tubbs; R I Fisher; E Hartmann; A Rosenwald; G Ott; H-K Muller-Hermelink; D Wrench; T A Lister; E S Jaffe; W H Wilson; W C Chan; L M Staudt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.