Literature DB >> 34244908

Predictive Factors of Kinematics in Traumatic Brain Injury from Head Impacts Based on Statistical Interpretation.

Xianghao Zhan1, Yiheng Li2, Yuzhe Liu3, August G Domel1, Hossein Vahid Alizadeh1, Zhou Zhou1, Nicholas J Cecchi1, Samuel J Raymond1, Stephen Tiernan4, Jesse Ruan5, Saeed Barbat5, Olivier Gevaert2, Michael M Zeineh6, Gerald A Grant7, David B Camarillo1.   

Abstract

Brain tissue deformation resulting from head impacts is primarily caused by rotation and can lead to traumatic brain injury. To quantify brain injury risk based on measurements of kinematics on the head, finite element (FE) models and various brain injury criteria based on different factors of these kinematics have been developed, but the contribution of different kinematic factors has not been comprehensively analyzed across different types of head impacts in a data-driven manner. To better design brain injury criteria, the predictive power of rotational kinematics factors, which are different in (1) the derivative order (angular velocity, angular acceleration, angular jerk), (2) the direction and (3) the power (e.g., square-rooted, squared, cubic) of the angular velocity, were analyzed based on different datasets including laboratory impacts, American football, mixed martial arts (MMA), NHTSA automobile crashworthiness tests and NASCAR crash events. Ordinary least squares regressions were built from kinematics factors to the 95% maximum principal strain (MPS95), and we compared zero-order correlation coefficients, structure coefficients, commonality analysis, and dominance analysis. The angular acceleration, the magnitude and the first power factors showed the highest predictive power for the majority of impacts including laboratory impacts, American football impacts, with few exceptions (angular velocity for MMA and NASCAR impacts). The predictive power of rotational kinematics about three directions (x: posterior-to-anterior, y: left-to-right, z: superior-to-inferior) of kinematics varied with different sports and types of head impacts.
© 2021. Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commonality analysis; Dominance analysis; Head impact; Regression interpretation; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34244908     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02813-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  31 in total

1.  Development of a Second-Order System for Rapid Estimation of Maximum Brain Strain.

Authors:  Lee F Gabler; Jeff R Crandall; Matthew B Panzer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Temporal development of hippocampal cell death is dependent on tissue strain but not strain rate.

Authors:  Heather L Cater; Lars E Sundstrom; Barclay Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Correlation between injury pattern and Finite Element analysis in biomechanical reconstructions of Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Authors:  Madelen Fahlstedt; Bart Depreitere; Peter Halldin; Jos Vander Sloten; Svein Kleiven
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  High Energy Side and Rear American Football Head Impacts Cause Obvious Performance Decrement on Video.

Authors:  Adam J Bartsch; Daniel Hedin; Jay Alberts; Edward C Benzel; Jason Cruickshank; Robert S Gray; Kenneth Cameron; Megan N Houston; Tyler Rooks; Gerald McGinty; Erick Kozlowski; Steven Rowson; Joseph C Maroon; Vincent J Miele; J Chris Ashton; Gunter P Siegmund; Alok Shah; Michael McCrea; Brian Stemper
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury.

Authors:  A C Bain; D F Meaney
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  An instrumented mouthguard for measuring linear and angular head impact kinematics in American football.

Authors:  David B Camarillo; Pete B Shull; James Mattson; Rebecca Shultz; Daniel Garza
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Axonal injury in the optic nerve: a model simulating diffuse axonal injury in the brain.

Authors:  T A Gennarelli; L E Thibault; R Tipperman; G Tomei; R Sergot; M Brown; W L Maxwell; D I Graham; J H Adams; A Irvine
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Instantaneous Whole-Brain Strain Estimation in Dynamic Head Impact.

Authors:  Kianoosh Ghazi; Shaoju Wu; Wei Zhao; Songbai Ji
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Ranking and Rating Bicycle Helmet Safety Performance in Oblique Impacts Using Eight Different Brain Injury Models.

Authors:  Madelen Fahlstedt; Fady Abayazid; Matthew B Panzer; Antonia Trotta; Wei Zhao; Mazdak Ghajari; Michael D Gilchrist; Songbai Ji; Svein Kleiven; Xiaogai Li; Aisling Ní Annaidh; Peter Halldin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  From biomechanics to pathology: predicting axonal injury from patterns of strain after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Cornelius K Donat; Maria Yanez Lopez; Magdalena Sastre; Nicoleta Baxan; Marc Goldfinger; Reneira Seeamber; Franziska Müller; Polly Davies; Peter Hellyer; Petros Siegkas; Steve Gentleman; David J Sharp; Mazdak Ghajari
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  3 in total

1.  Consensus Head Acceleration Measurement Practices (CHAMP): Origins, Methods, Transparency and Disclosure.

Authors:  Kristy B Arbogast; Jaclyn B Caccese; Thomas A Buckley; Andrew S McIntosh; Kyvory Henderson; Brian D Stemper; Gary Solomon; Steven P Broglio; James R Funk; Jeff R Crandall
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Finding the Spatial Co-Variation of Brain Deformation With Principal Component Analysis.

Authors:  Xianghao Zhan; Yuzhe Liu; Nicholas J Cecchi; Olivier Gevaert; Michael M Zeineh; Gerald A Grant; David B Camarillo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.756

3.  Assessment of brain injury characterization and influence of modeling approaches.

Authors:  Saichao Yang; Jisi Tang; Bingbing Nie; Qing Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.