Local anaesthesia as a standard of care for penetrating keratoplasty?

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: To determine preferences in the use of local anaesthesia (LA) versus general anaesthesia (GA) for penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and to examine the safety of LA for PK. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PKs performed at an ophthalmology department in Canada from 01/01/2008 to 01/01/2020 was conducted to investigate rate of major complications. A questionnaire was also sent out to cornea specialists in the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada to determine trends in anaesthesia use for PK. Data on anaesthesia use in keratoplasty data was also obtained from the National Health Service Blood and Tissue (NHSBT) register.
RESULTS: The retrospective study found that 2143 PKs were performed under LA by 4 surgeons. The following complications were revealed: 1 acute anxiety attack with tachycardia, 3 extraocular myotoxicity cases requiring squint surgery, 1 expulsive suprachoroidal haemorrhage and 1 retrobulbar haemorrhage. The survey revealed 92% of cornea specialists in Canada preferred LA to GA. In the UK, 4.5% of specialists preferred LA, with most preferring GA due to suprachoroidal haemorrhage risk. NHSBT data revealed that 86.6% of 6181 PKs performed in UK between 01/04/2015 and 31/03/2020 were done under GA.
CONCLUSIONS: LA is preferred for PK in Canada, in contrast to the UK where GA is preferred. Our retrospective study suggests a low incidence of LA-related complications. We suggest that LA should be considered for most cornea transplant techniques, including optical penetrating keratoplasty. Rising worldwide keratoplasty numbers, ageing populations and risks of pandemics (e.g. COVID-19) give more reason for reduced reliance on GA.

Introduction

Diseases of the cornea are a leading cause of blindness globally. Since corneal transplantation (keratoplasty) was first performed more than 100 years ago; the number of keratoplasties has been observed to be rising globally [1-6].

Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) involves full-thickness trephination of the patient’s cornea. This results in an open globe (so called ‘open sky’ procedure), until a new donor graft is sutured in place. There is an increased risk of intraocular bleeding and extrusion of intraocular contents [7]. This may be the reason that cornea surgeons may be more resistant to using local anaesthesia for a PK, as compared to lamellar (partial thickness) keratoplasties where the globe is closed.

Local anaesthesia (LA) has replaced general anaesthesia (GA) as the default anaesthesia choice for most anterior and posterior segment intraocular surgeries [8, 9]. Retrobulbar (RB), peribulbar (PB) and sub-Tenon’s (ST) blocks are forms of LA which provide both akinesia and anaesthesia, which are important for safe PK surgery [7, 10].

This study aims to examine the safety of LA (specifically: RB, PB and ST blocks) in PK, and whether it may be considered the standard of care. It consists of three parts:

A retrospective analysis of PKs performed under LA at Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (University of British Columbia).

Analysis from National Health Service Blood and Tissue (NHSBT) and questionnaire results from UK and Canada cornea specialists.

Discussion including a literature review of safety of LA for PK.

Materials and methods

Retrospective analysis

The study was carried out at the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia in Canada. The study was conducted in adherence with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia.

PKs performed from 01/01/2008 to 01/01/2020 at Mount Saint Joseph Hospital were reviewed for the occurrence of major complications relating to LA. Surgery was performed by a senior surgeon or a trainee in their team, the seniority of the primary surgeon was not recorded. Complications were pre-defined prior to the retrospective review of clinical notes, and were categorised as peri-operative or post-operative (Table 1). Of note, peri-operative complications included all complications occurring from the start of anaesthesia until return of the patient to the recovery room from surgery. A review of sedation and LA protocols was also performed.

Table 1

Pre-defined peri-operative and post-operative complications of local anaesthesia (LA) blocks.

Peri-operative complications	Post-operative complications
Retrobulbar haemorrhage	Permanent extraocular myotoxicity
Suprachoroidal haemorrhage	Vision loss due to LA
Globe perforation	Any other complication related to LA or incomplete anaesthesia/akinesia of the eye
Inability to perform surgery due to LA
Extrusion of intraocular contents
Optic nerve damage
Oculocardiac reflex
Allergic reaction
Cardiovascular complications
Central nervous system complications
Respiratory complications

PK anaesthesia data

Data was acquired from NHSBT on the use of local versus general anaesthetic in corneal transplantation [11]. The data, which was received on the 2nd July 2020, were collated for all cornea transplantations performed between 1st April 2015 and 31st March 2020.

Questionnaire data

A questionnaire was sent to practicing cornea specialists in the UK, in the following areas:

East Grinstead, Sussex

Liverpool

London

Manchester

Nottingham

Southampton

Cornea specialists in each UK region were identified by searching each hospital department’s website for cornea specialists, and by contacting ophthalmology departments’ secretaries. Missing contact details for cornea specialists in the UK were obtained from the nhs.net directory search and online search for contact details on published research articles. The cornea fellow at Moorfield’s eye hospital was also contacted to hand out a paper questionnaire to cornea specialists to maximise the response rate.

A register and contact details of practicing cornea specialists in Canada was obtained from the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and a questionnaire was emailed to them.

Three short questions were asked to the cornea specialists to maximise questionnaire response rates:

Is local (LA) or general (GA) anaesthesia your default option for a standard penetrating keratoplasty operation?

If LA is your preference, which type do you use (e.g. sub-Tenon’s, peribulbar, etc)?

If GA is your preference, why is this the case?

Results

Retrospective analysis of penetrating keratoplasties

Surgeons 1 and 2 started performing PKs before 2008, surgeon 3 started in 2012, and surgeon 4 started in 2017. In total, 2143 eyes underwent one of the following procedures by four surgeons:

PK (primary or repeat)

PK (primary or repeat) with extracapsular lens extraction (ECCE) and intraocular lens (IOL) insertion

The number of corneal transplants performed by each surgeon (or their fellow/resident) are as follows:

Surgeon 1: 938 PKs and 62 PKs combined with ECCE and IOL insertion

Surgeon 2: 925 PKs and 75 PKs combined with ECCE and IOL insertion

Surgeon 3: 90 PKs and 10 PKs combined with ECCE and IOL insertion

Surgeon 4: 41 PKs and 2 PKs combined with ECCE and IOL insertion

It was not possible to determine the exact number of surgeries performed by a trainee (resident or fellow) as opposed to the main surgeon as this is not documented. On questioning of the four surgeons, it is estimated that 50% of PKs were performed by a trainee.

The sedation protocols were: Patients undergoing keratoplasty are offered sedation. Patient who would like sedation are normally given 1 mg of midazolam, with or without an analgesic agent (e.g. oral acetaminophen, intravenous fentanyl, etc). The maximum sedation permissible is 2 mg of intravenous midazolam. In total, 2143 PKs were performed either with or without ECCE and IOL insertion. The LA protocol was 3–7 ml of 50:50 lignocaine (2%) and bupivacaine (0.75%).

6 (0.28%) complications occurred out of a total of 2143 cases. Surgeon 1 had four complications, surgeon 2 had two complications and surgeons 3 and 4 had no LA-related complications.

The six complications were:

three cases of inferior recti myotoxicity requiring squint surgery.

one expulsive suprachoroidal haemorrhage (SCH).

one retrobulbar haemorrhage.

one case of tachycardia and severe acute anxiety, either due to intrathecal injection or a panic attack.

The three cases of inferior rectus muscle damage showed spontaneous improvement of double vision but did not achieve full resolution. Persistent double vision thus required treatment and were referred to the adult strabismus service. All three patients underwent squint surgery with resolution of symptoms.

The eye that developed a retrobulbar haemorrhage had no ocular nor systemic risk factors. There was no long-term effect on vision. Surgery was done successful under RB anaesthesia one month later. The eye with an expulsive SCH had very limited visual potential due to advanced glaucoma. The patient was of Far East Asian background and was noted to have a shallow orbit with narrow interpalpebral aperture. The expulsive SCH resulted in complete extrusion of the intraocular contents and the eye underwent subsequent evisceration.

One patient had tachycardia (heart rate > 110 beats per minute) and severe acute anxiety within 5 min of a RB block, requiring urgent assessment by an anaesthetist. Surgery was not carried out. Anaesthetist assessment was not conclusive of a cause for this reaction. The two possible causes were intrathecal penetration of the LA, or a panic attack (patient has past medical history of severe anxiety).

NHSBT findings

The data acquired from NHSBT showed that 86.6% (5350/6181) of PKs carried out between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2020 were carried out under GA. In contrast, 10.4% (640/6181) of PKs in that same time frame were carried out under local anaesthesia. The remaining 3.1% of PKs were carried out under an unknown (not reported) method of anaesthesia (Table 2). Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is often performed under a similar anaesthesia method as PK, because of the risk of conversion to PK during surgery. NHSBT data showed that 90.6% of 1954 DALKs were performed under GA, 6.3% under LA and 3% unreported anaesthesia choice. Of note, 6512 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and 3,400 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) operations were performed in this period. 33.5% of DSAEKs and 29.5% of DMEKs were performed under GA, and 64.1% of DSAEKs and 67.1% of DMEKs were performed under LA [11].

Table 2

Graft type and anaesthetic use for adult corneal transplants performed in the UK between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2020 as of 2 July 2020 per National Health Service Bone and Transplant.

	Anaesthetic
Graft Type	General	Local	Unknown	Total
DSAEK	2184 (33.5%)	4174 (64.1%)	154 (2.4%)	6512
PK	5350 (86.6%)	640 (10.4%)	191 (3.1%)	6181
DMEK	1002 (29.5%)	2282 (67.1%)	116 (3.4%)	3400
DALK	1771 (90.6%)	124 (6.3%)	59 (3%)	1954
EK Unknown	533 (37.3%)	867 (60.7%)	28 (2%)	1428
Superficial lamellar	94 (69.1%)	40 (29.4%)	2 (1.5%)	136
Other	197 (49%)	180 (44.8%)	25 (6.2%)	402
Unknown	113 (7%)	56 (3.5%)	1440 (89.5%)	1609

Questionnaire findings

23 (68%) out of 34 UK specialists who were contacted completed the questionnaire. 38 (72%) out of 53 cornea specialists in Canada completed the questionnaire. A provincial breakdown of these responses yielded that 4 (11%) of the responses came from Alberta, 6 (16%) from British Columbia, 1 (2.6%) from Nova Scotia, 2 (5.3%) from Manitoba, 14 (37%) from Ontario, and 11 (29%) from Quebec. Of the cornea specialists in the UK, 2 (8.7%) practiced in East Grinstead, 13 (57%) in London, 1 (4.3%) in Liverpool, 3 (13%) in Manchester, 2 (8.7%) in Nottingham and 2 (8.7%) in Southampton.

35 (92%) of 38 cornea specialists in Canada preferred the use of LA over GA. This contrasts with the UK, where 19 (83%) of 23 specialists preferred to use GA (Fig. 1). The other 4 (17%) specialists in the UK did not have a preference, but rather determined anaesthesia suitability on a case-by-case basis. All UK specialists preferred to use GA for younger patients.

Fig. 1

Preference of anaesthesia choice for penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada.

Horizontal axis shows the type of anasthesia preferred by country (Canada vs UK). Vertical axis shows percentage of surgeons (from those surveyed).

26 (74%) of the 35 Canadian specialists who preferred local anaesthesia specified RB block to be their preferred method of LA for a standard PK. 3 (8.6%) of the same population preferred one of a ST block, a PB block, or did not have a preference, but rather determined anaesthesia suitability on a case by case basis.

Figure 2 summarises the LA preferences. One of the surgeons who preferred RB anaesthesia additionally used sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia if the former was found to provide inadequate akinesia or analgesia intraoperatively. 1 of 20 surgeons preferred to use RB anaesthesia in patients below 40 years of age, and ST anaesthesia in patients who are 40 years of age or above.

Fig. 2

Local anaesthesia (LA) preference of corneal specialists in Canada for penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

This pie chart illustrates the percentage of surgeons in Canada preferring each type of local anaesthesia.

Although not directly enquired about in the questionnaire, five cornea specialists in Canada cited circumstances in which they would prefer the use of GA over LA. These reasons are patient anxiety, difficulty in positioning or maintaining patient position, intellectual/cognitive impairment, high risk of expulsive SCH, or previous negative reactions due to LA.

Of the 19 UK specialists who preferred GA over LA, 18 stated higher intraoperative safety as the reason for their preference. One cornea specialist stated that they preferred GA because it was the standard anaesthesia used for a PK in the UK. 14 of these 19 UK surgeons specifically named a lower risk of expulsive SCH as their reason for preferring safety profile of GA. The other five surgeons preferred GA because it meant less concern about peri-operative movements and positive vitreous pressure.

Of the 12 UK corneal specialists who mentioned occasional use of LA, 1 preferred ST block, while 50% (6/12) preferred PB block and 42% (5/12) preferred RB block.

Discussion

The choice of LA versus GA for cornea transplantation is an important one for the patient, the surgeon and operating theatre staffing and efficiency. The more invasive the keratoplasty procedure (e.g. PK), the more controversial the choice of anaesthesia is expected to be. Rising cornea transplant numbers and ageing populations means choice of anaesthesia is critical [1-6]. In the era of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, disease now termed COVID-19) pandemic, anaesthesia choice has even more implications. Avoiding GA means avoiding intubation and other aerosol generating procedures, which can increase risk of nosocomial transmission to healthcare staff during viral pandemics [12].

LA has the advantages of time efficiency, being less labour intensive, less costly, and does not require fasting. There are circumstances in which GA is the better or only suitable option. This includes significant patient anxiety, difficulty in positioning patient or maintaining position, intellectual/cognitive impairment, high risk of expulsive SCH, or previous negative reactions to LA. GA may also be more suitable for complex cases (e.g. combined surgeries) in which the patient is expected to lie still for more than 2 h.

The retrospective review of PK surgeries by four surgeons in BC revealed a low incidence (0.28%) of serious complications. It is noteworthy that only one expulsive SCH occurred, with no evidence of a link to use of LA. Expulsive SCH is the most common complication cited by UK specialists in our questionnaire as the reason for avoiding LA. However, the rate of expulsive SCH in our study is one of the lowest in the published literature (see below) [7]. This is despite the PKs being done under LA. 3 cases of extraocular myotoxicity occurred, requiring surgical intervention for full resolution. A review of causes [10] [13] of this is beyond the scope of this study. Patients in our study had RB blocks injected through the classic ‘Atkinsons’ insertion site; at the inferotemporal margin of the orbit. Risk of this complication may be reduced by adjusting needle insertion site to be more lateral [10]. Of note, since adding hyaluronidase to our standard LA mixture, this complication has not occurred. Hyaluronidase may reduce the risk of extraocular myotoxicity, as well as other LA-related adverse events [13].

As a retrospective study, it was not possible to assess the efficacy of anaesthesia, or how many injections were required to achieve adequate anaesthesia and akinesia. This is a weakness of this study. However, all PKs were successfully completed without having to induce GA for any patient, indicating efficacy of LA for this procedure. The Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company, who provide cover for ophthalmologists nationwide in the USA, reported four deaths from GA and two deaths from brainstem anaesthesia in insurance claims from ocular injury related to anaesthesia [14].

The level of sedation required for a PK is an important in the context of LA. In our experience, deep sedation may result in snoring and sudden movement due to waking up. None of the patients in our retrospective study received more than 2 mg of intravenous midazolam. The level of sedation is thus conservative, and patients are conscious. Although there is continuous respiratory and cardiovascular monitoring, heavy sedation is not administered in our department. This is because all sedation is administered by a trained nurse with no anaesthetist supervision. Analgesics can also be used, due to reported benefit in combination with sedation in ophthalmic surgery [15]. Deep sedation is not however a requirement for performing cornea transplantation under LA.

Another important aspect of LA is that lid and orbicularis akinesia are not always fully achieved with LA (PB, RB or ST blocks). In the authors’ experience, this is usually achieved well when the block is performed correctly (adequate LA quantity and injected into correct anatomical space). If this is not the case, then more LA is injected to achieve this, and block given time to reach this effect (at least 15 min). Another option is to perform a facial nerve block to enable orbicularis akinesia, which is important in open globe surgery, particularly high-risk PK.

Both Canada and the UK are higher income countries, both offer publicly funded healthcare, and are part of the Commonwealth of Nations. One may therefore not expect a substantial variance in anaesthesia choice for one of the most common cornea surgeries. It is noteworthy that PK is an established procedure, and was first successfully performed in 1906 [16]. A similarity in evolution of anaesthesia use for PK may therefore be expected. Interestingly, Canada and UK specialists cite the same reasons for choosing to do a PK under GA (Table 3). These findings are suggestive of personal preference rather than evidence-based information in determining anaesthesia choice. This may be explained by less robust research (see below) into anaesthesia interventions in PK as compared to other surgical specialties [17-20].

Table 3

Comparison of reasons for choosing general anaesthesia (GA) over local anaesthesia (LA) for penetrating keratoplasty (PK) amongst cornea specialists in the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada.

Cornea specialists in UK	Cornea specialists in Canada
Higher intraoperative safety	Patient anxiety
Lower risk of expulsive suprachoroidal haemorrhage	Difficulty positioning patient
Reduced positive vitreous pressure	Intellectual cognitive impairment
Easier to administer systemic intraoperative medications (e.g. muscle relaxants, hypotensive anaesthesia, mannitol)	High risk of expulsive suprachoroidal haemorrhage
Young and/or anxious patient	Previous negative reaction to LA
Higher patient comfort and easier to position patient
Most common practice nationwide

Our retrospective analysis at UBC and the questionnaire show that the large majority of Canadian cornea specialists prefer LA. This contrasts with the NHSBT data which shows that 86.6% of PKs performed between April 2015 to March 2020 were done under GA. This correlates with the questionnaire findings showing that 83% of UK specialists prefer GA. This is a striking difference considering that different forms of anaesthesia have different complication profiles. We consider NHSBT to be highly representative of cornea practice in the UK as this is the only source of cornea grafts nationally. A few centres import cornea grafts from abroad when there is a shortage of tissue. Notably, NHSBT data indicates that GA was also used for approximately a third of endothelial (DMEK and DSAEK) keratoplasties. There appears to be equivocal safety and efficacy of LA versus GA in endothelial keratoplasty [21]. Although large comparative trials are needed, one would expect LA to be safer in endothelial keratoplasty than PK due to avoidance of an open globe (‘open sky’). Interestingly, GA has been reported as the preferred technique for keratoplasty by 93% of ophthalmologists in the UK since the 1990s [22]. We hypothesise that there are adequate number of ophthalmology operating theatre lists with anaesthetist cover in the UK, which may lead to cornea specialists feeling that use of LA is non-justifiable. If most surgeons perform PK under GA, this may be considered to be the standard of care. The use of LA may have not therefore been explored by UK specialists due to concerns about medico-legal implications. For example, if a UK specialist was to have a major complication during a PK under LA, he or she may be criticised or unsupported by colleagues regarding the anaesthesia choice. Less experience with RB/PB blocks in PK surgery understandably leads to the concerns about extrusion of intraocular contents and SCH. In our experience and others [7, 23, 24], more than 3–6 ml of LA for a PB or RB block is rarely needed. It is therefore unexpected to result in significantly increased posterior vitreous pressure. It is important to administer pressure (e.g. Honan balloon) on the globe after a local block to reduce intraocular pressure and positive vitreous pressure [25].

In Canada, few ophthalmology surgical lists have anaesthetist cover. Most specialists use LA as a result, and may have had most surgical training in cornea transplantation done using LA. This may explain why their preference is for LA. If there were more surgical lists with anaesthetist cover, more specialists may have preferred GA.

LA has good efficacy and safety in PK. In a study of 16,224 patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery, 95% of patients achieved 95% or more degree of akinesia with PB anaesthetic administered by surgeons, anaesthetists or nurses [26]. In another prospective study of 137 consecutive keratoplasties, 100 (73%) were performed under PB anaesthesia [27]. 80% achieved complete akinesia, and 94% of patients found the procedure to be painless. Surgical conditions were reported as optimal by the surgeon in 98% of cases, and 98% of patients found PB anaesthesia satisfactory or very satisfactory. One eye (1%) had a severe intraoperative non-expulsive SCH. In another prospective study of 136 PK patients, 124 (91%) underwent PB (5 ml) anaesthesia [24]. Most PKs were combined with other procedures (60.5%), and 7.2% overall required intravenous sedation. No information on oral sedation was given. 92% had adequate akinesia after 1st PB injection, and 97% of patients were satisfied with analgesia. 5% developed positive intraocular pressure and 4% developed chemosis. The surgery was completed successfully in all cases, and no cases of SCH were reported. In another prospective study, Wang et al. compared LA with GA for 141 optical and therapeutic PKs [23]. All of the intraoperative complications, namely extrusion of intraocular contents and iris prolapse, occurred in the eyes that underwent therapeutic (not optical) PK under LA. No SCH was reported in any of the cases. Relapse rate for fungal keratitis in this group was 13%, compared to GA in which relapse did not occur. There was no increased risk of intraoperative complications in LA versus GA in patients undergoing an optical PK.

In a case series of 2011 eyes that underwent PKs, expulsive SCH occurred in 0.45%. There was no difference in rate of expulsive SCH between LA and GA [28]. The incidence of SCH was significantly higher in eyes with pre-operative anterior chamber IOLs than any other condition. In another study of 830 PKs, 9 (1.08%) had a massive SCH [29]. 4 out of 714 PKs done under GA had a SCH, compared to 5 out of 116 PKs done under RB block. It was not known why the rate was higher in LA patients. Seven of the nine eyes had open posterior capsules, and were either aphakic (four eyes) or had an anterior chamber IOL (three eyes). In a larger case series of 2412 PKs, incidence of expulsive SCH was 0.1%. 2298 PKs were done under GA, and 123 were done under LA. All expulsive SCH occurred under GA [30]. In another case series of 543 cases that underwent PK for optical improvement, 4 eyes (0.73%) developed an intraoperative SCH. Of these, the two that had GA had an expulsive SCH and the two (50%) that had PB anaesthesia had a non-expulsive massive SCH [7].

A RB block is often regarded as higher risk form of anaesthesia than a PB block. However, both techniques have been found to be equally efficacious in cataract surgery, with rare and equivalent risks of severe complications [31]. As far as we know, there are no trials comparing the efficacy and safety of different forms of LA for PKs. This is an area which may benefit from future clinical trials.

In conclusion, increasing demand and evolution of keratoplasty techniques have contributed to rising numbers of corneal transplants globally [1-6]. There is evidence in the literature to suggest the safety of LA in endothelial keratoplasty [21], but little data exist on penetrating keratoplasty. The results of our study, the questionnaire of cornea specialists and literature review support consideration of LA as a standard rather than an exceptional anaesthetic choice for penetrating keratoplasty. Moreover, patients who are systemically not fit for GA should not be excluded from having a PK under LA if this intervention is needed. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2, the findings of this study bear even more relevance. Avoiding GA means avoiding intubation and other aerosol generating procedures, which can increase risk of nosocomial transmission to healthcare staff during viral pandemics [12].

We suggest LA as an effective and safe anaesthesia choice for primary or repeat penetrating keratoplasty, particularly optical penetrating keratoplasty.

Summary

What was known before

There is limited data about the safety and efficacy of local anaesthesia for penetrating keratoplasty.

What this study adds

Local anaesthesia has good safety and efficacy profile in penetrating keratoplasty.

We suggest that local anaesthesia should be considered for most corneal transplantation, including optical penetrating keratoplasty.