Literature DB >> 34240533

Computational modeling reveals strategic and developmental differences in the behavioral impact of reward across adolescence.

Whitney D Fosco1,2, Samuel N Meisel3,4, Alexander Weigard5, Corey N White6, Craig R Colder7.   

Abstract

Studies of reward effects on behavior in adolescence typically rely on performance metrics that confound myriad cognitive and non-cognitive processes, making it challenging to determine which process is impacted by reward. The present longitudinal study applied the diffusion decision model to a reward task to isolate the influence of reward on response caution from influences of processing and motor speed. Participants completed three annual assessments from early to middle adolescence (N = 387, 55% female, Mage  = 12.1 at Wave 1; Mage  = 13.1 at Wave 2, Mage  = 14.1 at Wave 3) and three annual assessments in late adolescence (Mages  = 17.8, 18.9, 19.9). At each assessment, participants completed a two-choice reaction time task under conditions of no-reward and a block in which points were awarded for speeded accuracy. Reward reduced response caution at all waves, as expected, but had a greater impact as teens moved from early to middle adolescence. Simulations to identify optimal response caution showed that teens were overly cautious in early adolescence but became too focused on speed over accuracy by middle adolescence. By late adolescence, participants adopted response styles that maximized reward. Further, response style was associated with both internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early-to-middle adolescence, providing evidence for the construct validity of a diffusion model approach in this developmental period.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescence; diffusion model; longitudinal; reward; speed-accuracy trade-off

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34240533      PMCID: PMC8741886          DOI: 10.1111/desc.13159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  50 in total

1.  Integration to boundary in decisions between numerical sequences.

Authors:  Moshe Glickman; Marius Usher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-07-29

Review 2.  Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility.

Authors:  Eveline A Crone; Ronald E Dahl
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior.

Authors:  B J Casey
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Adolescent risky decision-making: neurocognitive development of reward and control regions.

Authors:  Linda Van Leijenhorst; Bregtje Gunther Moor; Zdena A Op de Macks; Serge A R B Rombouts; P Michiel Westenberg; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Enhancing response inhibition by incentive: comparison of adolescents with and without substance use disorder.

Authors:  Tammy Chung; Charles Geier; Beatriz Luna; Stefan Pajtek; Robert Terwilliger; Dawn Thatcher; Duncan B Clark
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  The effect of passengers and risk-taking friends on risky driving and crashes/near crashes among novice teenagers.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; Marie Claude Ouimet; Zhiwei Zhang; Sheila E Klauer; Suzanne E Lee; Jing Wang; Rusan Chen; Paul Albert; Thomas A Dingus
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Philip Shaw; Noor J Kabani; Jason P Lerch; Kristen Eckstrand; Rhoshel Lenroot; Nitin Gogtay; Deanna Greenstein; Liv Clasen; Alan Evans; Judith L Rapoport; Jay N Giedd; Steve P Wise
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A unique adolescent response to reward prediction errors.

Authors:  Jessica R Cohen; Robert F Asarnow; Fred W Sabb; Robert M Bilder; Susan Y Bookheimer; Barbara J Knowlton; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects.

Authors:  Don van Ravenzwaaij; Chris Donkin; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

10.  Decomposing the effects of context valence and feedback information on speed and accuracy during reinforcement learning: a meta-analytical approach using diffusion decision modeling.

Authors:  Laura Fontanesi; Stefano Palminteri; Maël Lebreton
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.