Literature DB >> 20188198

Adolescent risky decision-making: neurocognitive development of reward and control regions.

Linda Van Leijenhorst1, Bregtje Gunther Moor, Zdena A Op de Macks, Serge A R B Rombouts, P Michiel Westenberg, Eveline A Crone.   

Abstract

Recent models hypothesize that adolescents' risky behavior is the consequence of increased sensitivity to rewards in the ventral medial (VM) prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the ventral striatum (VS), paired with immature cognitive control abilities due to slow maturation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and lateral PFC. We tested this hypothesis with fMRI using a gambling task in which participants chose between Low-Risk gambles with a high probability of obtaining a small reward (1 Euro) and High-Risk gambles with a smaller probability of obtaining a higher reward (2, 4, 6, or 8 Euro). We examined neural responses during choice selection and outcome processing in participants from 4 age groups (pre-pubertal children, early adolescents, older adolescents and young adults). High-Risk choices increased with rewards for all ages, but risk-taking decreased with age for low reward gambles. The fMRI results confirmed that High-Risk choices were associated with activation in VMPFC, whereas Low-Risk choices were associated with activation in lateral PFC. Activation in dorsal ACC showed a linear decrease with age, whereas activation in VMPFC and VS showed an inverted U-shaped developmental pattern, with a peak in adolescence. In addition, behavioral differences in risk-taking propensity modulated brain activation in all age groups. These findings support the hypothesis that risky behavior in adolescence is associated with an imbalance caused by different developmental trajectories of reward and regulatory brain circuitry. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20188198     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  170 in total

1.  Neural Interaction Between Risk Sensitivity and Cognitive Control Predicting Health Risk Behaviors Among Late Adolescents.

Authors:  Jungmeen Kim-Spoon; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Nina Lauharatanahirun; Julee P Farley; Pearl H Chiu; Warren K Bickel; Brooks King-Casas
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 2.  The timing of educational investment: a neuroscientific perspective.

Authors:  P A Howard-Jones; E V Washbrook; S Meadows
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 3.  Considerations for imaging the adolescent brain.

Authors:  Adriana Galván; Linda Van Leijenhorst; Kristine M McGlennen
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 6.464

4.  Parental education predicts corticostriatal functionality in adulthood.

Authors:  Peter J Gianaros; Stephen B Manuck; Lei K Sheu; Dora C H Kuan; Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal; Anna E Craig; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Striatal sensitivity during reward processing in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Yannis Paloyelis; Mitul A Mehta; Stephen V Faraone; Philip Asherson; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Potentiation of the early visual response to learned danger signals in adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Liat Levita; Philippa Howsley; Jeff Jordan; Pat Johnston
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  Developmental perspectives on risky and impulsive choice.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  The development of psychotic disorders in adolescence: a potential role for hormones.

Authors:  Hanan D Trotman; Carrie W Holtzman; Arthur T Ryan; Daniel I Shapiro; Allison N MacDonald; Sandra M Goulding; Joy L Brasfield; Elaine F Walker
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  An Overview of Judgment and Decision Making Research Through the Lens of Fuzzy Trace Theory.

Authors:  Roni Setton; Evan Wilhelms; Becky Weldon; Christina Chick; Valerie Reyna
Journal:  Xin Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan       Date:  2014-12

10.  Incentives facilitate developmental improvement in inhibitory control by modulating control-related networks.

Authors:  Michael N Hallquist; Charles F Geier; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.