Literature DB >> 34240298

Clinical, radiographic and restorative parameters for short tuberosity implants placed in smokers: a retrospective study with 5 year follow-up.

Aasem M Alhenaki1, Faraz K Alrawi1, Ahmed Mohamed2, Abdullah Alshahrani1, Mohammed Alrabiah1, Sameer A Mokeem3, Eman M AlHamdan1, Paras Ahmad2, Fahim Vohra1, Tariq Abduljabbar4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate and compare the clinical, radiographic, and restorative parameters around short tuberosity implants (STIs) placed in cigarette smokers (CS) and never smokers (NS). In this 60-month follow-up retrospective study, a total of 50 (37 males + 13 females) individuals who had received 82 dental implants were included. These participants were categorized into two groups as follows: (i) Group-1: 25 self-reported systemically healthy CS with 43 STIs; and (ii) Group-2: 25 self-reported systemically healthy NS with 39 STIs. In both groups, peri-implant plaque index (PI), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and crestal bone loss (CBL) and restorative parameters were measured at 12 and 60 months of follow-up. Group comparisons were performed utilizing the Kruskal-Wallis test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. In CS and NS, the mean age of participants was 58.5 and 60.7 years, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in the overall mean levels of PD and CBL around STIs among CS and NS. However, a statistically significant increase was observed in the mean scores of BOP and PI around STIs in the NS and CS at 12 and 60 months follow-up, respectively. In both groups, the loosening of the implant was the most frequently encountered type of STI failure. The outcomes of the present study suggest that STIs placed in maxillary tuberosity can show reliable clinical, radiographic, and restorative stability among cigarettes smokers and non-smokers. However, the role of smoking status and oral hygiene cannot be disregarded in this scenario.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cigarette smoking; Crestal bone loss; Peri-implant inflammation; Short dental implant

Year:  2021        PMID: 34240298     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-021-00623-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  35 in total

1.  Associations Between Early Implant Failure, Patient Age, and Patient Mortality: A 15-Year Follow-Up Study on 2,566 Patients Treated with Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Jaw.

Authors:  Torsten Jemt; Mats Nilsson; Malin Olsson; Victoria Franke Stenport
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience.

Authors:  Nikolai J Attard; George A Zarb
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 3.  A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics.

Authors:  Melanie R Wood; Stanley G Vermilyea
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Franck Renouard; David Nisand
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 5.  Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.

Authors:  Franck Renouard; David Nisand
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 6.  Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review.

Authors:  M C Goiato; D M dos Santos; J F Santiago; A Moreno; E P Pellizzer
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 7.  Placement of dental implants in the maxillary tuberosity: a systematic review.

Authors:  L F dT P Lopes; V F da Silva; J F Santiago; S R Panzarini; E P Pellizzer
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 8.  Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Zeinab Rezaei Esfahrood; Loghman Ahmadi; Elahe Karami; Shima Asghari
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

9.  Direct Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation for Simultaneous Dental Implant Placement.

Authors:  Mamit Kumar; Sumit Chopra; Debdutta Das; Monika Gupta; Jyoti Memoalia; Gaurav Verma
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec

Review 10.  Treatment of dental implant displacement into the maxillary sinus.

Authors:  Jun-Hyeong An; Sang-Hoon Park; Jeong Joon Han; Seunggon Jung; Min-Suk Kook; Hong-Ju Park; Hee-Kyun Oh
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.