Literature DB >> 25260833

Placement of dental implants in the maxillary tuberosity: a systematic review.

L F dT P Lopes1, V F da Silva2, J F Santiago1, S R Panzarini2, E P Pellizzer3.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to identify clinical studies on implants placed in the tuberosity region to determine the survival rate of these implants when compared to implants placed in other regions of the maxilla. A search for data published up until March 2014 was undertaken using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases. Eligible studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The first database search revealed 310 titles. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, five studies remained for the detailed analysis. A total of 113 patients were followed for a period of 6-144 months; 289 implants were placed in the patients evaluated. There were eight failures/losses of dental implants in the tuberosity region; the overall survival rate was 94.63% for these implants. In controlled studies, the cumulative survival rates for implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity and other maxillary regions were 96.1% and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, implants placed into the maxillary tuberosity are a predictable alternative for the treatment of patients with insufficient bone volume in the maxillary region. However, randomized trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of this treatment.
Copyright © 2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alveolar bone; dental implants; maxilla; maxillary sinus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25260833     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Clinical, radiographic and restorative parameters for short tuberosity implants placed in smokers: a retrospective study with 5 year follow-up.

Authors:  Aasem M Alhenaki; Faraz K Alrawi; Ahmed Mohamed; Abdullah Alshahrani; Mohammed Alrabiah; Sameer A Mokeem; Eman M AlHamdan; Paras Ahmad; Fahim Vohra; Tariq Abduljabbar
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Anatomical study of the maxillary tuberosity using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ester Manzanera; Paula Llorca; David Manzanera; Verónica García-Sanz; Vicente Sada; Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 3.  Closed versus open reduction of facial fractures in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Igor Pereira; Eduardo Pellizzer; Cleidiel Lemos; Sandra Moraes; Belmiro Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-01-01

4.  Failure rates of miniscrews inserted in the maxillary tuberosity.

Authors:  Muhammad Azeem; Arfan Ul Haq; Zubair Hassan Awaisi; Muhammad Mudassar Saleem; Muhammad Waheed Tahir; Ahmad Liaquat
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-11-11

5.  Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bone-Guided Regeneration in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Composite Biomaterial: A Case Report.

Authors:  Saulo Henrique Salviano; João Carlos Amorim Lopes; Igor da Silva Brum; Lúcio Frigo; Mario José Dos Santos; Sílvio Roberto Consonni; Jorge José de Carvalho
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2021-09-29

Review 6.  Can Genetic Factors Compromise the Success of Dental Implants? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior; Claudia Cristina Biguetti; Mariza Akemi Matsumoto; Guilherme Abu Halawa Kudo; Raquel Barroso Parra da Silva; Patrícia Pinto Saraiva; Walid D Fakhouri
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.