Jocelyn Zhi Jia Lee1, Hui-Chen Chen1, Jia Xin Lee2, Piyanee Klainin-Yobas3. 1. Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Level 2, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore. 2. Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore. 3. Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Level 2, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore. nurpk@nus.edu.sg.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to synthesize the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on caregivers of advanced cancer patients, in comparison with usual care, on caregivers' quality of life (QoL), anxiety, and depression symptoms. METHODS: Comprehensive searches for published and unpublished studies were performed using nine electronic databases, two trial registers, and reference lists of included studies. Two reviewers independently screened, appraised, and extracted data. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies, while the Cochrane data extraction tool was used to elicit relevant information. Meta-analysis, narrative analysis, and sensitivity analysis were conducted to synthesize data. Standardized mean differences (SMD) represented effects of psychosocial interventions. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials were included in this review. At post-intervention, findings revealed a significant small pooled effect size (SMD = 0.45) on QoL and significant moderate effect on depression (SMD = - 0.65). However, a small non-significant pooled effect size was observed on anxiety (SMD = - 0.24). At follow-up assessments, effect sizes of all outcomes were small and non-significant. Overall quality of evidence was rated very low for all outcomes and most studies had unclear or high risk of bias. Thus, results should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial interventions were effective in improving QoL and depression among caregivers of persons with advanced cancer. However, future randomized control trials with lower risk of bias, larger sample size, detailed participant characteristics, and informative interventions are desirable.
PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to synthesize the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on caregivers of advanced cancerpatients, in comparison with usual care, on caregivers' quality of life (QoL), anxiety, and depression symptoms. METHODS: Comprehensive searches for published and unpublished studies were performed using nine electronic databases, two trial registers, and reference lists of included studies. Two reviewers independently screened, appraised, and extracted data. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies, while the Cochrane data extraction tool was used to elicit relevant information. Meta-analysis, narrative analysis, and sensitivity analysis were conducted to synthesize data. Standardized mean differences (SMD) represented effects of psychosocial interventions. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials were included in this review. At post-intervention, findings revealed a significant small pooled effect size (SMD = 0.45) on QoL and significant moderate effect on depression (SMD = - 0.65). However, a small non-significant pooled effect size was observed on anxiety (SMD = - 0.24). At follow-up assessments, effect sizes of all outcomes were small and non-significant. Overall quality of evidence was rated very low for all outcomes and most studies had unclear or high risk of bias. Thus, results should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial interventions were effective in improving QoL and depression among caregivers of persons with advanced cancer. However, future randomized control trials with lower risk of bias, larger sample size, detailed participant characteristics, and informative interventions are desirable.
Authors: Ardith Z Doorenbos; Barbara Given; Charles W Given; Gwen Wyatt; Audrey Gift; Mohammad Rahbar; Sangchoon Jeon Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Laurel L Northouse; Maria C Katapodi; Lixin Song; Lingling Zhang; Darlene W Mood Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2010-08-13 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Ling Hu; Xianfeng Zhang; Zizheng Song; Kunjie Wang; Youchao Jia; Jin Song; Lei Su Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 2.809