BACKGROUND:Advanced lung cancer (LC) patients and their families have reported low self-efficacy for self-care/caregiving and high rates of distress, yet few programs exist to address their supportive care needs during treatment. This pilot study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a 6-session, telephone-based dyadic psychosocial intervention that was developed for advanced LC patients and their caregivers. The program was grounded in self-determination theory (SDT), which emphasizes the importance of competence (self-efficacy), autonomy (sense of choice/volition), and relatedness (sense of belonging/connection) for psychological functioning. The primary outcomes were patient and caregiver psychological functioning (depression/anxiety) and caregiver burden. The secondary outcomes were the SDT constructs of competence, autonomy, and relatedness. METHODS:Thirty-nine advanced LC patients who were within 1 month of treatment initiation (baseline) and their caregivers (51% spouses/partners) completed surveys and were randomized to the intervention or usual medical care. Eight weeks after baseline, they completed follow-up surveys. RESULTS: Solid recruitment (60%) and low attrition rates demonstrated feasibility. Strong program evaluations (mean, 8.6/10) and homework completion rates (88%) supported acceptability. Participants receiving the intervention evidenced significant improvements (P < .0001) in depression, anxiety, and caregiver burden in comparison with usual medical care. Large effect sizes (d ≥ 1.2) favoring the intervention were also found for patient and caregiver competence and relatedness and for caregiver autonomous motivation for providing care. CONCLUSION: These findings support intervention feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. By empowering families with the skills to coordinate care and meet the challenges of LC together, this intervention holds great promise for improving palliative/supportive care services in cancer.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Advanced lung cancer (LC) patients and their families have reported low self-efficacy for self-care/caregiving and high rates of distress, yet few programs exist to address their supportive care needs during treatment. This pilot study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a 6-session, telephone-based dyadic psychosocial intervention that was developed for advanced LC patients and their caregivers. The program was grounded in self-determination theory (SDT), which emphasizes the importance of competence (self-efficacy), autonomy (sense of choice/volition), and relatedness (sense of belonging/connection) for psychological functioning. The primary outcomes were patient and caregiver psychological functioning (depression/anxiety) and caregiver burden. The secondary outcomes were the SDT constructs of competence, autonomy, and relatedness. METHODS: Thirty-nine advanced LC patients who were within 1 month of treatment initiation (baseline) and their caregivers (51% spouses/partners) completed surveys and were randomized to the intervention or usual medical care. Eight weeks after baseline, they completed follow-up surveys. RESULTS: Solid recruitment (60%) and low attrition rates demonstrated feasibility. Strong program evaluations (mean, 8.6/10) and homework completion rates (88%) supported acceptability. Participants receiving the intervention evidenced significant improvements (P < .0001) in depression, anxiety, and caregiver burden in comparison with usual medical care. Large effect sizes (d ≥ 1.2) favoring the intervention were also found for patient and caregiver competence and relatedness and for caregiver autonomous motivation for providing care. CONCLUSION: These findings support intervention feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. By empowering families with the skills to coordinate care and meet the challenges of LC together, this intervention holds great promise for improving palliative/supportive care services in cancer.
Authors: Susan C McMillan; Brent J Small; Michael Weitzner; Ronald Schonwetter; Mary Tittle; Linda Moody; William E Haley Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Chantal S Levesque; Geoffrey C Williams; Diane Elliot; Michael A Pickering; Bradley Bodenhamer; Phillip J Finley Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2006-11-30
Authors: David W Kissane; Maria McKenzie; Sidney Bloch; Chaya Moskowitz; Dean P McKenzie; Imogen O'Neill Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 19.242
Authors: Qi Chen; Lauren Terhorst; David A Geller; Wallis Marsh; Michael Antoni; Mary Amanda Dew; Michelle Biala; Josh Weinstein; Allan Tsung; Jennifer Steel Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2020-05-05
Authors: Vanessa B Sheppard; Luciane R Cavalli; Chiranjeev Dash; Yasmine M Kanaan; Asma A Dilawari; Sara Horton; Kepher H Makambi Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Nasser Hanna; Shadia I Jalal; Lawrence H Einhorn; Thomas J Birdas; DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Kenneth A Kesler; Jordan Schmitt; Deborah A Kashy; Victoria L Champion Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Mary A Ott; Nasser Hanna; Shadia I Jalal; Victoria L Champion Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2017 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: David S Black; Michael J Li; Ugonna Ihenacho; Nathalie T Nguyen; Maria de Fatima Reyes; Joel Milam; Mary Ann Pentz; Jane C Figueiredo Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.894