Luciana D Mendonça1, Christophe Ley2, Joke Schuermans3, Evi Wezenbeek3, Erik Witvrouw4. 1. Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Postdoctoral Researcher at Department of Physical Therapy and Motor Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil. Electronic address: lucianademichelis@yahoo.com.br. 2. Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Postdoctoral Researcher at Department of Physical Therapy and Motor Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Department of Physical Therapy and Motor Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the role of sports physical therapists (PT) in the injury prevention process and to compare the structure of preventive programs and associated (organization) policies applied in athletic organizations and sports teams of varying gender and level world-wide. DESIGN: cross-sectional study. SETTING: LimeSurvey platform. PARTICIPANTS: Sports PT working with athletes invited through the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sports injury prevention program (IPP) structure and implementation. RESULTS: 414 participants fully participate in this survey study. Athlete's injury history (68.84%), the most common injuries within the sport modality (67.87%) and athlete's preseason screening results (64.01%) were most frequently used to customize IPPs. Warm-up (70.04%) and individually PT-guided exercise-therapy (70.04%) were the preferred methods to organize the prevention routine. The main barrier for IPP implementation was lack of time within the athlete's weekly training schedule (66.66%). The majority of the participants (72.84%) reported to evaluate the perception of IPP's effect by comparing current and preceding seasons' injury occurrences. CONCLUSION: These survey results are the first identifying contemporary sports injury prevention organization and implementation policies on an international level. This information might support the sports PT community in improving and standardizing IPP (implementation) strategies worldwide.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the role of sports physical therapists (PT) in the injury prevention process and to compare the structure of preventive programs and associated (organization) policies applied in athletic organizations and sports teams of varying gender and level world-wide. DESIGN: cross-sectional study. SETTING: LimeSurvey platform. PARTICIPANTS: Sports PT working with athletes invited through the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sports injury prevention program (IPP) structure and implementation. RESULTS: 414 participants fully participate in this survey study. Athlete's injury history (68.84%), the most common injuries within the sport modality (67.87%) and athlete's preseason screening results (64.01%) were most frequently used to customize IPPs. Warm-up (70.04%) and individually PT-guided exercise-therapy (70.04%) were the preferred methods to organize the prevention routine. The main barrier for IPP implementation was lack of time within the athlete's weekly training schedule (66.66%). The majority of the participants (72.84%) reported to evaluate the perception of IPP's effect by comparing current and preceding seasons' injury occurrences. CONCLUSION: These survey results are the first identifying contemporary sports injury prevention organization and implementation policies on an international level. This information might support the sports PT community in improving and standardizing IPP (implementation) strategies worldwide.
Authors: Dongchun Tang; Weicong Cai; Wenda Yang; Shangmin Chen; Liping Li Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390