| Literature DB >> 34238228 |
Z H Miao1, W X Zhou1, R Y Cheng1, H J Liang1, F L Jiang1, X Shen2, J H Lu3, M Li1, F He4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence have shown that the intestinal microbiota plays an important role in prevention of host obesity and metabolism disorders. Recent studies also demonstrate that early life is the key time for the colonization of intestinal microbes in host. However, there are few studies focusing on possible association between intestinal microbiota in the early life and metabolism in adulthood. Therefore the present study was conducted to examine whether the short term antibiotic and/or probiotic exposure in early life could affect intestinal microbes and their possible long term effects on host metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Early life; High-fat diet; Intestinal microbiota; Metabolism; Visceral obesity
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34238228 PMCID: PMC8268513 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02263-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1The result of body weight and visceral fat rate (n = 12/group). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (a) The visceral fat rate of mice in different groups. (b) The body weight of mice in different groups. There were no significant differences among groups with a common letter P < 0.05
Fig. 2The result of fasting blood glucose and oral glucose tolerance test (n = 12/group). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (a) The fasting blood glucose of mice at week 0. (b) The fasting blood glucose of mice at week 12. (c) The area under the curve values of mice in different groups. (d) The oral glucose tolerance test of mice in different groups. There were no significant differences among groups with a common letter P < 0.05
Fig. 3The lipid metabolism-related index in mice (n = 12/group). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (a) Plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. (b) Plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. (c) Plasma levels of total cholesterol. (d) Plasma levels of triglyceride (e) Liver levels of total cholesterol. (f) Liver levels of triglyceride. There were no significant differences among groups with a common letter P < 0.05
Fig. 4The result of metabolism-related hormones and insulin resistance (n = 12/group). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (a) The serum level of insulin (b) The insulin-resistance indices of mice in different groups. (c) The serum level of adiponectin. (d) The serum level of leptin. There were no significant differences among groups with a common letter P < 0.05
Fig. 5The α-diversity of intestinal microbiota. (a) The Chao indices of intestinal microbiota at week 0 (b) The Chao indices of intestinal microbiota at week 12. (c) The Shannon indices of intestinal microbiota at week 0. (d) The Shannon indices of intestinal microbiota at week 12
Fig. 6The β-diversity of of intestinal microbiota. (a) Principal coordinate analysis based on the unweighted UniFrac distance of operational taxonomic units at week 0. (b) Principal coordinate analysis based on the unweighted UniFrac distance of operational taxonomic units at week 12
Fig. 7Effects of antibiotic/probiotic treatment and high fat diet on intestinal microbiota. (a) Relative abundance at the phylum level at week 0 (b) Relative abundance at the phylum level at week 12. (c) Relative abundance at the genus level at week 0. (d) Relative abundance at the genus level at week 12