Literature DB >> 34237458

What can be done to control the placebo response in clinical trials? A narrative review.

Kathryn Evans1, Luana Colloca2, Marta Pecina3, Nathaniel Katz4.   

Abstract

The desire to reduce high placebo response rates in clinical trials is a popular concept. However, few studies have rigorously examined the effectiveness of methods to control for placebo responses that are relevant to randomized controlled trials. The primary objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of experimental placebo manipulations in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We critically reviewed studies designed to manipulate placebo responses including positive expectations regarding the effectiveness of the placebo treatment, manipulating the time spent with subjects, and training study staff and subjects to accurately report symptom severity. These efforts have generally resulted in reduced placebo response and improved discrimination between drug and placebo. Interventions that neutralize staff and subject expectations and improve the ability of subjects to accurately report symptom severity have shown the most promise. Reduction of the placebo response has the potential to accelerate the development of new therapeutics.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expectation measurements; Placebo effect; Placebo response; Randomized controlled trials; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34237458      PMCID: PMC8719632          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  40 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee: effects of patient-provider communication.

Authors:  Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Carol Looney; Yanfang Liu; Vanessa Cox; Kenneth Pietz; Donald M Marcus; Richard L Street
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Increasing placebo responses over time in U.S. clinical trials of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Alexander H Tuttle; Sarasa Tohyama; Tim Ramsay; Jonathan Kimmelman; Petra Schweinhardt; Gary J Bennett; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Neurobiological mechanisms of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Helen S Mayberg; Tor D Wager; Christian S Stohler; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Clinical trial outcome in neuropathic pain: relationship to study characteristics.

Authors:  Jennifer Katz; Nanna B Finnerup; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Effect of oxytocin on placebo analgesia: a randomized study.

Authors:  Simon Kessner; Christian Sprenger; Nathalie Wrobel; Katja Wiech; Ulrike Bingel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Characterization and consequences of pain variability in individuals with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Richard E Harris; David A Williams; Samuel A McLean; Ananda Sen; Michael Hufford; R Michael Gendreau; Richard H Gracely; Daniel J Clauw
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-11

7.  Self-directed attention, awareness of bodily states, and suggestibility.

Authors:  M F Scheier; C S Carver; F X Gibbons
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1979-09

8.  A deeper look at pain variability and its relationship with the placebo response: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of naproxen in osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Roi Treister; Liat Honigman; Oluwadolapo D Lawal; Ryan K Lanier; Nathaniel P Katz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Placebo response in asthma: a robust and objective phenomenon.

Authors:  Margaret E Kemeny; Lanny J Rosenwasser; Reynold A Panettieri; Robert M Rose; Steve M Berg-Smith; Joel N Kline
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 10.793

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Great Expectations: recommendations for improving the methodological rigor of psychedelic clinical trials.

Authors:  Jacob S Aday; Boris D Heifets; Steven D Pratscher; Ellen Bradley; Raymond Rosen; Joshua D Woolley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.