| Literature DB >> 34236795 |
Irina V Tarasova1, Olga A Trubnikova1, Irina D Syrova1, Olga L Barbarash1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate late postoperative neurophysiological outcomes in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Entities:
Keywords: Alpha Rhythm; Cognitive Dysfunction; Coronary Artery Bypass; Neurophysiological Tests; Postoperative Cognitive Complications
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34236795 PMCID: PMC8597617 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ISSN: 0102-7638
Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients before CABG and 5-7 years after CABG.
| Variable | Patients, n=45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Before | 5-7 years after CABG | |
| Age, years, Me (Q25; Q75) | 56.0 (52; 59) | 62.5 (58,5; 66) |
| 2 (4%) | - | |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction, %, Me (Q25; Q75) | 60.0 (52; 63) | 60.5 (54; 63) |
| Functional class angina, n (%) | 0 (0%) | 32 (71%) |
| 37 (82%) | 44 (98%) | |
| Severity of coronary arteries lesions by the SYNTAX scale before surgery, scores, Me (Q25; Q75) | 22.5 (16.5; 29.3) | - |
| History of myocardial infarction, n (%) | 6 (13%) | - |
| Myocardial infarction after surgery, n (%) | - | 1 (2%) |
| Stenoses of the carotid arteries, n (%) | 21 (47%) | 23 (51%) |
| Diabetes mellitus Type 2, n (%) | 10 (22%) | 10 (22%) |
| 0 (0%) | 4 (9%) | |
| 40 (89%) | 20 (44%) | |
| MMSE, scores, Me (Q25; Q75) | 28 (26; 28) | 28 (27; 29) |
| FAB, scores, Me (Q25; Q75) | 17 (16; 17) | 16 (15; 17) |
| BDI-II, scores, Me (Q25; Q75) | 2 (1; 3) | 3 (2; 5) |
ACEi=angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; BDI-II=Beck Depression Inventory II; CABG=coronary artery bypass grafting; CCB=calcium channel blockers; FAB=Frontal Assessment Battery; Me=median; MMSE=Mini-Mental State Examination; NYHA=New York Heart Association
Cognitive test battery for assessing cognitive function in CABG patients.
| Cognitive tests and indicators | Description of the procedure |
|---|---|
| Reaction latencies of the right and left hands to stimuli (different colors of rectangles) when the subject should choose one of the three presented signals (the number of signals in the test is 30) | |
| The previous test is conducted in the feedback mode. The duration of the exposure to the test signal (see above) is changed automatically; the exposure of the next signal is shortened by 20 ms with each correct answer and extended by 20 ms, if the answer is wrong (the number of signals in the test is 120) | |
| The previous test is conducted in the feedback mode for a fixed period (5 min). It is necessary to process the maximum number of signals presented with a given exposure | |
| The subject is provided with the alphabetic version of the Bourdon's test to highlight certain letters for the lead time of 4 mins | |
| 10 words memorizing test, n | To remember as many of 10 words presented one after another as possible |
| 10 numbers memorizing test, n | To remember as many of 10 numbers presented one after another as possible |
| 10 nonsense syllable memorizing test, n | To remember as many of 10 nonsense syllables presented one after another as possible |
CABG=coronary artery bypass grafting
Fig. 1Topographic changes of the theta-1 rhythm power with eyes closed in patients with cognitive decline (А) and without cognitive decline (B) in the long-term period after coronary artery bypass grafting. Solid lines indicate preoperative indicators, dashed lines indicate 5-7 years after surgery. *marked significant differences (P≤0.05).
Fig. 2Changes of alpha-1 rhythm power with eyes closed in the left hemisphere in patients depending on the cognitive decline in the long-term period after coronary artery bypass grafting. Gray columns indicate preoperative indicators, black columns indicate 5-7 years after surgery. * marked significant differences (P≤0.05). POCD=postoperative cognitive dysfunction
Fig. 3Correlations between the cognitive status indicators and electroencephalographical power: (A) a correlation between number of memorized digit and log-transformed theta-1 rhythm power values (eyes closed); (B) correlations between errors in the brain performance test and log-transformed theta-2 and alpha-1 rhythms power values (eyes closed); and (C) correlations between a capacity of attention and log-transformed theta-2 rhythm power values (eyes open) in the coronary artery disease patients.
Results of the regression analysis of factors associated with postoperative cognitive decline five years after CABG in CAD patients.
| Dependent variable - integral cognitive status index (or CSI) | Beta | S.E. - Beta | t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | -2.335 | 0.028 | ||
| Mean alpha frequency | 0.669 | 0.133 | 5.025 | 0.00004 |
| Theta-2 rhythm with eyes closed in right temporal area | 1.134 | 0.258 | 4.394 | 0.0002 |
| Theta-2 rhythm with eyes open in left temporal area | -0.600 | 0.162 | -3.711 | 0.001 |
| Sequential organ failure assessment score | 0.296 | 0.131 | 2.268 | 0.03 |
| Theta-2 rhythm with eyes closed in right frontal area | -0.294 | 0.219 | -1.338 | 0.19 |
CABG=coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD=coronary artery disease; S.E.=standard error
| Abbreviations, acronyms & symbols | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACEi | = Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor | IAF | = Individual alpha frequency | |
| ANOVA | = Analysis of variance | |||
| BDI-II | = Beck Depression Inventory II | Me | = Median | |
| CABG | = Coronary artery bypass grafting | MMSE | = Mini-Mental State Examination | |
| CAD | = Coronary artery disease | MSCT | = Multi-slice spiral computed tomography | |
| CCB | = Calcium channel blockers | NYHA | = New York Heart Association | |
| CSI | = Cognitive status index | POCD | = Postoperative cognitive dysfunction | |
| EEG | = Electroencephalography | S.E. | = Standard error | |
| FAB | = Frontal Assessment Battery | USA | = United States of America | |
| Authors' roles & responsibilities | |
|---|---|
| IVT | Substantial contributions to the acquisition and analysis of data for the work; drafting the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| OAT | Substantial contributions to the acquisition of data for the work; drafting the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| IDS | Substantial contributions to the acquisition of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| OLB | Revising the work critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published |