Huibiao Quan1,2, Tuanyu Fang2, Leweihua Lin2, Lu Lin2, Qianying Ou2, Huachuan Zhang2, Kaining Chen2, Zhiguang Zhou3. 1. Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139, Renmin Middle Road, Furong District, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China. 2. Department of Endocrinology, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, No.19, Xiuhua Road, Haikou, 570311, Hainan, China. 3. Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139, Renmin Middle Road, Furong District, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China. zhouzhiguang@csu.edu.cn.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has a serious impact on people's lives in the world. Interventions that affect risk factors for prediabetes can prevent and reduce diabetes occurrence. Proinsulin (PI), true insulin (TI), and proinsulin to insulin ratio (PI/TI) are risk factors for diabetes. The roles of these indicators in prediabetes are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PI, TI, PI/TI, 2-h proinsulin (2hPI), 2-h true insulin (2hTI), and 2hPI/2hTI on the risk of prediabetes among the Chinese Han population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 1688 subjects including 718 prediabetes cases and 970 non-prediabetes controls from Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University. The cases involved 292 men and 426 women. The controls involved 324 men and 646 women. The mean age was 53.62 ± 12.43 years in the prediabetes group and 44.24 ± 12.87 years in the non-prediabetes group. RESULTS: Our results showed that PI, TI, PI/TI, 2hPI, 2hTI, and 2hPI/2hTI were significantly correlated with prediabetes (all p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that PI (OR 1.022, 95% CI 1.014-1.031, p = 0.00011), TI (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.003-1.007, p = 0.00012), PI/TI (OR 1.517, 95% CI 1.080-2.131, p = 0.016), and 2hTI (OR 1.000, 95% CI 1.000-1.001, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with an increased risk of prediabetes. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis indicated that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the combination (PI + TI + PI/TI + 2hPI + 2hTI + 2hPI/2hTI) in diagnosing prediabetes was 0.627, which was larger than the diagnostic value of HOMA-IR (AUC 0.614) and HOMA-β (AUC 0.387). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that PI, TI, PI/TI, and 2hTI could significantly enhance the risk of prediabetes in the Chinese Han population, which suggested that PI, TI, PI/TI, and 2hTI might be available risk factors for prediabetes.
INTRODUCTION:Diabetes mellitus (DM) has a serious impact on people's lives in the world. Interventions that affect risk factors for prediabetes can prevent and reduce diabetes occurrence. Proinsulin (PI), true insulin (TI), and proinsulin to insulin ratio (PI/TI) are risk factors for diabetes. The roles of these indicators in prediabetes are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PI, TI, PI/TI, 2-h proinsulin (2hPI), 2-h true insulin (2hTI), and 2hPI/2hTI on the risk of prediabetes among the Chinese Han population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 1688 subjects including 718 prediabetes cases and 970 non-prediabetes controls from Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University. The cases involved 292 men and 426 women. The controls involved 324 men and 646 women. The mean age was 53.62 ± 12.43 years in the prediabetes group and 44.24 ± 12.87 years in the non-prediabetes group. RESULTS: Our results showed that PI, TI, PI/TI, 2hPI, 2hTI, and 2hPI/2hTI were significantly correlated with prediabetes (all p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that PI (OR 1.022, 95% CI 1.014-1.031, p = 0.00011), TI (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.003-1.007, p = 0.00012), PI/TI (OR 1.517, 95% CI 1.080-2.131, p = 0.016), and 2hTI (OR 1.000, 95% CI 1.000-1.001, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with an increased risk of prediabetes. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis indicated that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the combination (PI + TI + PI/TI + 2hPI + 2hTI + 2hPI/2hTI) in diagnosing prediabetes was 0.627, which was larger than the diagnostic value of HOMA-IR (AUC 0.614) and HOMA-β (AUC 0.387). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that PI, TI, PI/TI, and 2hTI could significantly enhance the risk of prediabetes in the Chinese Han population, which suggested that PI, TI, PI/TI, and 2hTI might be available risk factors for prediabetes.
Authors: Lars Rydén; Peter J Grant; Stefan D Anker; Christian Berne; Francesco Cosentino; Nicolas Danchin; Christi Deaton; Javier Escaned; Hans-Peter Hammes; Heikki Huikuri; Michel Marre; Nikolaus Marx; Linda Mellbin; Jan Ostergren; Carlo Patrono; Petar Seferovic; Miguel Sousa Uva; Marja-Riita Taskinen; Michal Tendera; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Paul Valensi; Jose Luis Zamorano; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Guy De Backer; Per Anton Sirnes; Eduardo Alegria Ezquerra; Angelo Avogaro; Lina Badimon; Elena Baranova; Helmut Baumgartner; John Betteridge; Antonio Ceriello; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; Dietrich C Gulba; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; John K Kjekshus; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Eli Lev; Christian Mueller; Ludwig Neyses; Peter M Nilsson; Joep Perk; Piotr Ponikowski; Zeljko Reiner; Naveed Sattar; Volker Schächinger; André Scheen; Henrik Schirmer; Anna Strömberg; Svetlana Sudzhaeva; Juan Luis Tamargo; Margus Viigimaa; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Robert G Xuereb Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Aruna D Pradhan; JoAnn E Manson; James B Meigs; Nader Rifai; Julie E Buring; Simin Liu; Paul M Ridker Journal: Am J Med Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Goodarz Danaei; Mariel M Finucane; Yuan Lu; Gitanjali M Singh; Melanie J Cowan; Christopher J Paciorek; John K Lin; Farshad Farzadfar; Young-Ho Khang; Gretchen A Stevens; Mayuree Rao; Mohammed K Ali; Leanne M Riley; Carolyn A Robinson; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321