PURPOSE: To assess the associations among baseline levels of fasting insulin and proinsulin, proinsulin:insulin ratio, and the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in apparently healthy middle-aged women. METHODS: In a nested case-control study involving a nationwide cohort of 27,628 participants from the Women's Health Study, 126 women with diabetes diagnosed during a 4-year follow-up period were compared with 225 age-matched controls. Fasting insulin level and proinsulin:insulin ratio were assessed in quartiles, and proinsulin level was assessed in categories (< or =4.0 pmol/L, 4.01 to 6.99 pmol/L, > or =7.0 pmol/L). The risk of developing type 2 diabetes was determined using conditional logistic regression analysis that adjusted for body mass index and other diabetes risk factors. RESULTS: Baseline insulin and proinsulin levels and proinsulin:insulin ratios were significantly higher among cases than among controls. Women with elevated insulin levels in the highest as compared with the lowest quartile were more likely to develop diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 5.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 17.6), as were women with elevated (> or =7.0 pmol/L vs. < or =4.0 pmol/L) proinsulin levels (OR = 16.4; 95% CI: 5.8 to 46.8) and women with proinsulin:insulin ratios in the highest quartile (OR = 9.6; 95% CI: 3.1 to 30.8). Similar results were observed among women with a baseline hemoglobin A(1c) level < or =6.0%. In time-trend analyses, fasting insulin was a consistent predictor of long-term risk. Proinsulin and proinsulin:insulin ratio, although predictive throughout the study, were especially strong predictors of rapid progression to type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION: Elevated fasting insulin and proinsulin levels and proinsulin:insulin ratio are associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes in apparently healthy middle-aged women.
PURPOSE: To assess the associations among baseline levels of fasting insulin and proinsulin, proinsulin:insulin ratio, and the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in apparently healthy middle-aged women. METHODS: In a nested case-control study involving a nationwide cohort of 27,628 participants from the Women's Health Study, 126 women with diabetes diagnosed during a 4-year follow-up period were compared with 225 age-matched controls. Fasting insulin level and proinsulin:insulin ratio were assessed in quartiles, and proinsulin level was assessed in categories (< or =4.0 pmol/L, 4.01 to 6.99 pmol/L, > or =7.0 pmol/L). The risk of developing type 2 diabetes was determined using conditional logistic regression analysis that adjusted for body mass index and other diabetes risk factors. RESULTS: Baseline insulin and proinsulin levels and proinsulin:insulin ratios were significantly higher among cases than among controls. Women with elevated insulin levels in the highest as compared with the lowest quartile were more likely to develop diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 5.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 17.6), as were women with elevated (> or =7.0 pmol/L vs. < or =4.0 pmol/L) proinsulin levels (OR = 16.4; 95% CI: 5.8 to 46.8) and women with proinsulin:insulin ratios in the highest quartile (OR = 9.6; 95% CI: 3.1 to 30.8). Similar results were observed among women with a baseline hemoglobin A(1c) level < or =6.0%. In time-trend analyses, fasting insulin was a consistent predictor of long-term risk. Proinsulin and proinsulin:insulin ratio, although predictive throughout the study, were especially strong predictors of rapid progression to type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION: Elevated fasting insulin and proinsulin levels and proinsulin:insulin ratio are associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes in apparently healthy middle-aged women.
Authors: Chong Wee Liew; Anke Assmann; Andrew T Templin; Jeffrey C Raum; Kathryn L Lipson; Sindhu Rajan; Guifen Qiang; Jiang Hu; Dan Kawamori; Iris Lindberg; Louis H Philipson; Nahum Sonenberg; Allison B Goldfine; Doris A Stoffers; Raghavendra G Mirmira; Fumihiko Urano; Rohit N Kulkarni Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Li Li; David J Ruau; Chirag J Patel; Susan C Weber; Rong Chen; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Joel T Dudley; Atul J Butte Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Ann-Hwee Lee; Keely Heidtman; Gökhan S Hotamisligil; Laurie H Glimcher Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Eliana S Di Cairano; Alberto M Davalli; Lucia Perego; Silvia Sala; V Franca Sacchi; Stefano La Rosa; Giovanna Finzi; Claudia Placidi; Carlo Capella; Paola Conti; Victoria E Centonze; Francesca Casiraghi; Federico Bertuzzi; Franco Folli; Carla Perego Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Fumiaki Imamura; Kenneth J Mukamal; James B Meigs; José A Luchsinger; Joachim H Ix; David S Siscovick; Dariush Mozaffarian Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: E Ferrannini; E Muscelli; A Natali; R Gabriel; A Mitrakou; A Flyvbjerg; A Golay; K Hojlund Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 10.122